similar to: NFS mounted Samba Shares

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission

Hello list, I tried to set up a folder on our fileserver domain member, so I can deploy software for users' machines, but is not working. If I put the software inside "netlogon" it installs correctly. \\172.16.1.7\storage\programs Auth Users - read & execute, list folder contents, read and write Do I need other permissions? -- Elias Pereira

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > Hi Guys, > Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not > sure if it is valid > > Here is what we are planning, high level > Phase1: > > - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing > domain > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:41:43 +1000 Rob Thoman via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > root at sam3dc # smbldap-populate > Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated at /usr/share/perl5/ > smbldap_tools.pm line 1423, <DATA> line 522. > Unable to open /etc/smbldap-tools/smbldap.conf for reading ! > Compilation failed in require at /usr/sbin/smbldap-populate

Hi, The setup used to work on a when both file and AD were in the same box. We're trying to separate them. The 'net rpc testjoin' gives: Join to "LIN" is ok. The wbinfo -u does list all users with "LIN\username". The getent passwd lists the LIN\username with all the attrributes". This is after putting in your suggestions about winbind trusted domains only and

hello guys, In my tests lab did the migration ldap base of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADCD. It's possible to migrate directories and files from users of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADDC? -- Elias Pereira

Hello Morillo, I have reviewed the steps described again. In fact, I had already done this several times. :D Even so, it does not map. The shared folder is mapped, but the printer is not. On windows 7 it works correctly. On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM MORILLO Jordi via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Printing is working well for us. > Carrefully

Rowland, Sorry to bother you with so many questions. I've tried everything to make it work, but I could not. I have already seen several videos regarding sharing permissions and advanced permissions of windows server and I made identical to what was in the video and it still did not work. On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

On 22/12/14 17:47, Elias Pereira wrote: > And now, I run the command "samba-tool user list" and the result is as > follows: > > *# samba-tool user list* > *ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb* > *Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password from secrets.ldb: Could not find entry to match > filter:

Thanks for the feedback too Andrew!!! I will analyze and verify the least impactful way to try to solve this problem. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 16:05 -0200, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Hello guys, > > > > I work at an institution where the domain is institute.edu.br. We have a >

> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access the security tab.

I greatly appreciate the answers. Are of great value to me and to others who like me do not have much experience. Another question. :D I believe that we will use debian as distribution for the new Samba4. What I need to copy from the old to the new distro? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 06/12/14 14:32, Elias Pereira wrote:

The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at

Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another

1.5 seconds is pretty long, I would look into what those queries are. I would also look into repeated queries, sometimes these things are clients stuck in a loop where they don't complete because they expect some termination condition. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 09:25 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > The saga continues... > I've spent a whole day with log level 5

Hello L.P.H van Belle Your apt are offline? I am getting error messages while updating my distro and when I access the https://apt.van-belle.nl/ the following message appears: "Site: Unknown This site you entered is not known by this server. or did you used an ipaddress to access this server ! Try again with a correct hostname" -- Elias Pereira

Hai Elias, 聽 Sorry for the late reply. I do preffer the list, and i understand why you mailt my directly, but best is to keep this on the list. The more eye that see this, the more chance you have on a reply. I must say, i personaly dont use any trust relations ships. that was long ago when i used that, so im bit rusty here. 聽 Now, i see you are using my 4.8.2 packages. so you on debian. *( or

Hello Andrew, What's the explanation for when the log level is set to 5, the error NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT doesn't appear, but when it's at the default log level, it does? On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:33?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > hi Andrew, thanks for the help!!! > > It seems to me the LDAP process being busy would be the root cause here. >>