similar to: WERR_BAD_NET_RESP on replication (--full-sync)

Thanks Garming. We currently use a standalone bind DNS server. Will the later version of samba work without the integrated DNS backend? Cheers Chris On 21/06/18 23:41, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi, > > Many of these syncing problems were solved in Samba 4.7 (and probably a > few more in 4.8). There were a number of unresolved locking issues that > we uncovered as well as some

Hi, Many of these syncing problems were solved in Samba 4.7 (and probably a few more in 4.8). There were a number of unresolved locking issues that we uncovered as well as some inconsistencies with Windows replication. I would try join a DC with one of the latest Samba versions and see if your problems persist. Cheers, Garming On 21/06/18 21:35, Chris Lewis via samba wrote: > Hello, >

What does the WERR_BAD_NET_RESP means? I'm currently upgrading our DCs to 4.8.3 and I've noticed that the off-site DC has a sync problem of the CN=Configuration NC. The FSMO DC is still in the 4.5.5, but all other DCs, including the off-site are already on 4.8.3. Trying to sync the off-site DC with one of the updated DCs does not work either. The WERR_BAD_NET_RESP message already

Hi The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is failing. I have enabled the log level 9. samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --full-sync -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9

Hi I have tried using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is failing.Please assist to fix samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --sync-forced -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9 idmap: 9

I have a couple of Samba4 AD DCs replicating with Windows Server 2008 DCs. This has been sort of finicky, but I've managed to get it to work (mostly) for several weeks. However, I'm now having an issue where one of my Samba4 DCs will not replicate from any of the other DCs (Windows or Samba) in the domain (Error is WERR_BAD_NET_RESP). Replication output is below. If anyone has ideas of

On 1/11/2018 1:57 PM, Harsh Kukreja wrote: > Hi > > I have tried  using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is > failing.Please assist to fix > > samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na > <http://iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na> iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na > --sync-forced -UAdministrator > INFO: Current debug levels: >   all: 9 >   tdb: 9 >  

Hi James Thanks for your response. hots -t A iumsvrpdc (use it's fqdn as well) I have verified it with the FQDN which says that the record iumsvrpdc.iumnet.edu.na exists Search for 'iumsvrpdc' objectGUID ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid : it shows 2 records found # record 1 dn: CN=NTDS

On 1/11/2018 10:39 AM, Harsh Kukreja via samba wrote: > Hi > > The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is > failing. I have enabled the log level 9. > > samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na > --full-sync -UAdministrator > INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 9 > tdb: 9 > printdrivers: 9 >

I have a Win2k3 server and am trying to manage a Samba4 box (name:UBUNTUSERVER, running Ubuntu 12.04.3 + Samba 4.0.10) as a backup. All seemed well, but after a problem with replication (result 1306 WERR_REVISION_MISMATCH), I couldn't even demote the samba4 DC. So I deleted from SERVERW2K3, deleted /usr/local/samba and re-compiled everything. Also ran make quicktest, all seems OK. Now, this

Hi All, I have joined a samba4 instance to en existing W2k8 AD domain as an additional domain controller. When I do samba-tool dbcheck I get (example) : ERROR: wrong instanceType 4 on CN=INVIEW-DC2,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=inview,DC=local, should be 0 Not changing instanceType from 4 to 0 on CN=INVIEW-DC2,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=inview,DC=local This happens for 644 out of 655 of the

Hello, Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment. I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs, patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install. # samba-tool dbcheck Checking 807 objects Not fixing nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Performance Monitor Users,CN=Builtin,DC=inview,DC=local <--- all errors were

I’m getting errors with replication Samba 4.9.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 6 Samba DC’s at 3 sites I recently joined a Win2k8 R2 server to the domain and promoted it to domain controller. The replication was working before that, and not working after. I didn’t realize the problems and tried to join a Win2012 R2 server and promote to DC as well. That also failed with an error about replication failures.

Hi, My apologies if this is a FAQ that I missed. This is my first attempt at setting up samba4. Following the howto instructions: kinit administrator seems to work fine. samba is latest git (alpha19). however the join fails (as below): [root at ads bin]# ./samba-tool domain join tribalnova.local DC -Uadministrator --realm=tribalnova.local -d4 GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego'

Hi All, Does anyone know if there's a Samba 4 to Samba 4 migration process? Sounds weird, but it has a logical reason: I've a several-year-old S4 implementation, from an early Alpha (10 I think?) that hasn't been in the best of shape of late - when S4 4.0.0 arrived, I accidentally upgraded using my normal "git pull; ./configure; make; make install" procedure and instead of

Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Hi to all, >> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports >> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors >> with the

On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>> Hi to all, >>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >>> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports

On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Hi to all, > Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba > packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports > (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with > the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names". > > If I install Bind9 in version

On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the

Hi Stefan, I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the bullseye-backports. I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf. If you need further information to compare just ask. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um