similar to: Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 08:08:53 +0100 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:10:03 -0400 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have either > > libnss-winbind or libpam-winbind files on my AD/DC. > > I keep forgetting that you use slackware, I suppose it uses

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:10:03 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have > > >

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have either > libnss-winbind or libpam-winbind files on my AD/DC. I keep forgetting that you use slackware, I suppose it uses something different, but do you have any file like: libnss_winbind.so.2 > > Circling back

In order to get help using a more up-to-date version of Samba, I've just upgraded from 4.4.16 to 4.8.2. So far, nothing new seems to be broken, but I still have to track down some issues I've been having. First off, I notice that something has changed with my BUILTIN\administrators ID. before, I had, e.g.: > ls -l

Hi Mark, See below. ;-) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mark > Foley via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 22:50 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2 > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:50:00 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > >

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:50:15 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:39:46 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > And i did read the Comment to for Rowland below, > > On debian you need : > > libnss-winbind libpam-winbind to be installed. > > I think you miss one of these. > > They are

Imo, this is a left over of an old bug, just remove the file Registry.po imo, i'll bet its never used. The computer looks for Registry.pol not Registry.po. > -rwxrwx--- 1 root users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.po* > -rwxrwx--- 1 3000000 users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.pol* Look at the date 2014, and i do remember something about this. But... What does getfacl say about

on Fri Jul 28 14:30:33 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/07/2023 19:04, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > > > After checking with the previous run, these sysvolreset errors are the same as > > before, so syncing the sysvol didn't make any different. > > > > You wrote: "It looks to me that you have more GPO's

Not quite 4 years ago I replaced our office SBS 2008 server with Samba4. I added Group Policies one of which was for Redirected Folders. I created a new GPO, "HPRS Groups" and did Edit > User Configuration > Policies > Windows Settings > Folder Redirection > right-click on Documents > Properties > Target = Settings Basic - Redirect everyone's folder to the same

On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:54:51 +0200 Henry Jensen wrote: > > Am 6. Juni 2018 19:55:52 MESZ schrieb Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >I am running Samba 4.4.16 on Slackware64 14.2. I have a domain member > >Windows 7 workstation. I > >upgraded the hardware on this computer a couple of weeks ago. I deleted > >the computer from > >the domain,

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:39:46 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > And i did read the Comment to for Rowland below, > On debian you need : > libnss-winbind libpam-winbind to be installed. > I think you miss one of these. They are the glue that connects Samba to nsswitch and allows 'getent passwd username' to work. Without

I am running Samba 4.4.16 on Slackware64 14.2. I have a domain member Windows 7 workstation. I upgraded the hardware on this computer a couple of weeks ago. I deleted the computer from the domain, the re-joined after finishing the upgrade. This computer show in the list with 'samba-tool group listmembers "Domain Computers"', but does not show up in ADUC > Computers. I've

Mark, See below. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mark > Foley via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 14 juni 2018 22:04 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >....... I see funny things here. For example, > drwxrwxr-x+ 34 10001 10000 4096 2018-06-10 22:51 mark/ > drwxrwx---+ 5 3000038 10000 4096 2015-09-03

Hello again Rowland, list! Sorry for the delayed response, and top posting. To recap: I'd like to complete the member server wiki so that ACLs can be set from windows without taking undocumented steps. The three ways I've found to do this are: 1) map root to administrator. (LPH VanBelle's script uses this option.) 2) chmod 0775 then chgrp "<DOMAIN>\Domain Admins"

On 27/02/15 21:00, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I'm also not an expert, but with the amount of help you provide on the list, > I will defer to you. > > I'd love to know your rational for prefering the "change ownership to > administrator" approach over the "change group to Domain Admins approach". > If it's just gut, that's

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:52:46 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Given no responses on this question for a few days, I'm concluding > that we're out of ideas on this problem. Let me propose a couple of > ideas. Apparently, the basic Windows FOLDER and SHARE permissions > are correct according to Louis' recommendations (see message below).

Would "testparm -v" show you the path of all the files used ? Are there any idmap settings? It looks like the newer version is using winbind to allocate uid's (based on the high ID numbers.) Maybe because it does not see uid's already allocated. The domain member may be showing correct id's because of caching. -----Original Message----- From: samba

on Wed, 25 Jan 2017 20:15:49 -0500 Gaiseric Vandal wrote: > Would "testparm -v" show you the path of all the files used ? Are there any idmap settings? Gaiseric, thanks for your response. the `testparm -v` gave me: private dir = /var/lib/samba/private So, I guess that means the sam.ldb in that directory is the one being used, not the one in /etc/samba/private. That helps.

Sorry for the serial posting, but ... anxious ... I think there must be a bug in Samba 4.4.8, this all worked with 4.2.14. To summarize (details in attached messages), since upgrading from Samba 4.2.14 to 4.4.8, getent returns the wrong UID:GID. This is causing permission errors in programs like dovecot who try to read/write to Maildir files having the correct UID:GID. With 4.4.8 I now have