Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "chrony configuration for secondary samba DC"
2018 Jun 03
4
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:29:04 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm running samba 4.7.6 on ubuntu 18.04 as (backup / secondary) domain
> > controller
>
> No your not, you are just running Samba as
2018 Jun 04
5
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Sunday, 3 June 2018 16:32:12 CEST Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:11:47 +0300
>
> Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rowland Penny via samba
> >
> > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:29:04 +0300
> > >
> > > Alexei Rozenvaser
2018 Jun 07
3
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
DC that doesn't holding PDC emulator FSMO role should sync it's time
with DC that holdings such role. Right?
But I can understand how it works in case of samba DC without PDC
emulator FSMO role and with NTP server configured according to
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation#Set_up_the_ntpd.conf_File_on_a_DC
. Doesn't it create conflict between samba potential to sync
2018 Jun 03
3
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
The output is:
alexei at ubuntu-dc:~$ sudo samba -b | grep 'SIGND'
NTP_SIGND_SOCKET_DIR: /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:32 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:11:47 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rowland Penny via samba
2018 Jun 03
2
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:29:04 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm running samba 4.7.6 on ubuntu 18.04 as (backup / secondary) domain
> > controller
>
> No your not, you are just running Samba as
2018 Jun 03
4
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
By the way there is ntpsigndsocket option in chrony configuration
file. https://chrony.tuxfamily.org/doc/3.3/chrony.conf.html#ntpsigndsocket
Can you please look at
https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Setting_up_a_samba-ad-dc and may be
https://chrony.tuxfamily.org/comparison.html ?
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:32 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Jun
2018 Jun 08
4
Samba Time Synchronisation wikipage
I have update the Time Synchronisation Wikipage:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation
It now includes information for the 'chrony' time server.
If you spot any errors or omissions, or if you think that something
could be said better, please report back ;-)
Could I also thank Louis Van Belle for proofreading the page.
Rowland
2018 Jun 07
3
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:12:23 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:56:16 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > DC that doesn't holding PDC emulator FSMO role should sync it's time
> > with DC that holdings such role. Right?
> > But I can understand how it works in case of
2018 Jun 07
2
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
It wasn't particularly Chrony related question. The question applies
to Samba DC that not holds PDC emulator FSMO role with any NTP server.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:12 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:56:16 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > DC that doesn't holding PDC
2018 Jun 03
1
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
But according to following command output chrony on my samba dc
already serves the windows clients:
alexei at ubuntu-dc:~$ sudo chronyc clients
Hostname NTP Drop Int IntL Last Cmd Drop Int Last
===============================================================================
192.168.0.45 4 0 7 - 501 0 0 - -
192.168.0.72
2018 Jun 03
3
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
How you so sure about it?
Even at https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/samba chrony mentioned as
suggested related package
.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 6:13 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:59:38 +0200
> Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 03.06.2018 um 16:48 schrieb
2018 Jun 03
2
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
Am 03.06.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:37:45 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The output is:
>> alexei at ubuntu-dc:~$ sudo samba -b | grep 'SIGND'
>> NTP_SIGND_SOCKET_DIR: /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd
>
> First three letters are NTP and at the moment, Samba only supports the
2018 Jun 03
0
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:11:47 +0300
Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rowland Penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:29:04 +0300
> > Alexei Rozenvaser via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I'm
2018 Jun 03
2
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On 3 June 2018 at 17:54, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:45:37 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > How you so sure about it?
> > Even at https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/samba chrony mentioned as
> > suggested related package
> > .
>
> Ubuntu can recommend what they
2018 Jun 03
6
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
Am 03.06.2018 um 17:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:45:37 +0300
> Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> How you so sure about it?
>> Even at https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/samba chrony mentioned as
>> suggested related package
>> .
>
> Ubuntu can recommend what they like, but Samba only recommends and
2018 Jun 12
5
Samba Time Synchronisation wikipage
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:25 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
> I have update the Time Synchronisation Wikipage:
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation
>
> It now includes information for the 'chrony' time server.
>
> If you spot any errors or omissions, or if you think that something
> could be said
2018 Jun 04
3
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
Debian was the first ...
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/chrony/chrony_3.0-4+deb9u1_changelog
chrony (3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Import upstream version 3.0:
- Please see /usr/share/doc/chrony/changelog.gz for the release notes.
* Merge branch “experimental”:
- Enable support for MS-SNTP authentication in Samba.
Current version : chrony
2018 Jun 07
1
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
OK. But according to my best knowledge so far: There is no automatic
fall over of Single-Master roles in Windows Active Directory.
You can only transfer or seize it.
In other words all machines which AD members - always trying to sync
their time with current PDC Emulator even if it is offline, unless you
transfer or seize this role to other DC manually.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:32 PM Rowland Penny
2018 Jun 03
0
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:29:04 +0300
Alexei Rozenvaser via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm running samba 4.7.6 on ubuntu 18.04 as (backup / secondary) domain
> controller
No your not, you are just running Samba as another DC, all DCs are
equal except for the FSMO roles and they can be on any DC.
>that joined to an Existing Active Directory (Windows
2018 Jun 07
1
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:33:04 +0300
Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Correct. But it doesn't answer my original question. How should one to
> setup NTP server at his Samba DC that doesn't hold PDC emulator FSMO
> role...
Exactly as you would set up as the PDC emulator DC, except the first
time server would be the PDC emulator DC.
> Moreover, what