Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Fwd: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED for guest account to public share"
2018 May 25
0
Fwd: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED for guest account to public share
On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:13:44 -0400
Raymond Page via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm using samba-4.7.6-r0 and attempting to establish a public samba
> share where any anonymous user can write to the share.
>
> I have an issue where the 'guest' (uid 405) account is unable to
> write to a directory owned by that uid. If the gid or
2018 May 25
2
Fwd: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED for guest account to public share
Rowland,
The 'guest' user exists in /etc/passwd, and there are no users defined in
tdb backend.
1. /etc/passwd: guest:x:405:100:guest:/dev/null:/sbin/nologin
2. pdbedit -L -v: ^$ EOL
3. smb.conf updated as suggested - smbclient -U% //share/public -c 'put
test1.txt foobar'
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote file \foobar
Modifying the settings as suggested made no impact,
2018 Feb 23
2
smbcontrol reload & close-share not working like previous version
Hello.
I just upgrade my kernel, smbd and changed my smb.conf. (4.14.12-1-Arch" to
"4.14.19-1-lts") "samba 4.7.4-1"
But now, "reload smbd" and "close-share" can not drop connected users to
share. Because of that I have to restart smbd service for destroy a share
right now.
But it was working previous version and I don't know what is wrong right
2020 May 04
2
Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch
This is the smbstatus with 4.11.x. No problems on clients.
Using LC_ALL=C because have Polish locale set up.
[root at arch1 ~]# LC_ALL=C smbstatus
Samba version 4.11.3
PID Username Group Machine
Protocol Version Encryption
Signing
2020 Apr 23
1
Samba 4.12 network share issue
Dear all,
I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12
On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them.
After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well,
We get on windows when we try to open the network drive
2020 May 04
2
Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch
Forgot to add the tcpdump command used:
tcpdump -p -s 0 -n -w /root/tcpdump_all.txt
Pawel.
wt., 5 maj 2020 o 00:01 pavlos <pavlos.audiofreak at gmail.com> napisa?(a):
> OK, have repeated the test:
>
> - samba logs:
> http://www.mediafire.com/file/jy4qcyvqg6z39zu/logs.tar.gz/file
> - tcpdump log:
>
2015 Jun 13
4
idmap & migration to rfc2307
On 13/06/15 11:00, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> On 13 June 2015 at 09:34, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 June 2015 at 08:55, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sadly, even though sssd is now running and I'm no longer reliant on
>>> winbind, the rest of samba doesn't seem to be taking notice of these
>>>
2020 May 04
2
Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch
@Andrew,
Samba master - what do you mean? A clean compile and install from genuine
samba.org sources? As a matter of fact, I was thinking about it....
Let me do the tests now, with tcpdump. Will send some logs and outputs
later on.
You've asked previously - this is the smbstatus, already on the latest
kernel/samba versions.
The problem is persistent, no wonder...
[root at arch1 /]#
2015 Jun 13
3
idmap & migration to rfc2307
On 13/06/15 16:33, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> Hi buhorojo,
>
> I *think* I have a stable system for the moment... so thank you :-)
>
> On 13 June 2015 at 12:50, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I now set in smb.conf:
>>>
>>> server services = -dns +winbind -winbindd
>>>
>>> I stopped samba, then removed
2014 Dec 17
2
Fwd: samba & Oracle ACFS Issues
>
>
> > >Please remove the SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF entries.
> > >Oh, that's ancient. Do you have any possibility to move to
> > >"security=user"?
> > The smb.conf file was inherited from HP-UX system. Ok,
> > I'll remove them
> >
> > >Did you try "posix locking = no"? That is mostly criticial
2017 Jan 26
1
[4.3.11-Ubuntu] SMBD keeps Locks on NTUSER.DAT and ntuser.ini after logout
After having migrated my machines and user to Samba 4.3.11 on Ubuntu 16.04.1
(no domain upgrade, new provision, all accounts new defined) and old data
copied over to the new machines, I have now a broader testbed and notice
issues I didn't see prior to that.
Having roaming profiles (defined in the user object in LDB)...
Seemingly at random smbd keeps locks on NTUSER.DAT and ntuser.ini for a
2017 May 23
3
Windows 10 spawning thousands of child processes on Samba 4.3.11 server
On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:34:29 +0200
Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Yes, the users exist as both Linux and Samba users. My question was
> if the Windows client user "Admin" also needs to be Linux and Samba
> user.
>
There is no windows user called 'Admin', there is one called
'Administrator', if it is the later, then it
2009 Jul 02
2
Ubuntu Jaunty samba 3.3.2 print$ no write rights even though I do;-)
I am setting up a OpenLdap PDC with file and print services on Ubuntu Jaunty. Jaunty ships with samba 3.3.2. I configured samba to just use the registry back in which I think is pretty cool! What happend when I use the Add print wizard to add my Windows XP drivers I get the famous "unable to install driver access denied" message. I can ssh into the box with my user id and create files in
2006 Nov 25
1
Possible memory leak in smbd?
I noticed one of my smbd processes for one particular client (IUSR_JUNIPER)
is taking 200MB in memory, far different from all the other smbd processes.
Should I be concerned about a memory leak here? I don't think samba would
be caching any files, so I can't see why it'd use this much memory.
That windows client is a win2k IIS5 server, with well over 60 sites that are
hosted off a
1998 Jul 14
1
smbstatus show open files when none are
I recently (a few weeks ago) installed 1.9.18p8 in order
to get better performance with an Access Database, which along
with adding a TCP_NODELAY in the [global] section has that
working like a charm. Thing that's bugging me now is smbstatus.
When I run it I see open files listed when I know that they aren't.
The following output shows quite a few files open that aren't
really. The
2008 May 14
3
[Fwd: File Locking and Permissions Issue]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: File Locking and Permissions Issue
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:10:28 -0700
From: Jack Lauman <jlauman@nwcascades.com>
Organization: nwcascades.com
To: mailto:samba@lists.samba.org
I'm trying to get Lacerte 2007 Tax Accounting software working on a
Samba v3.0.28a based server. When one user is logged in it works fine.
When two or more users
2015 Jun 12
2
idmap & migration to rfc2307
Thanks buhorojo. The sssd list came up trumps here. When changing ID
mappings, the sssd database must be manually removed (rm
/var/lib/sss/db/*). I now have sssd working again :)
I shall keep an eye on the mappings during the day today..
On 12 June 2015 at 07:36, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/06/15 01:34, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 11 June 2015 at
2004 Sep 08
1
locked files in smbstatus
hello,
can anybody explain or point me to a document that explain the locked files
section produced by smbstatus -L (see below).
what means denymode ? access ? what means exclusive+batch in the oplock
section ?
can anybody point me to a document explaining the way file locking works ?
regards
# smbstatus -L
Locked files:
Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name
2010 Nov 26
2
ACL Problems with Samba and ADS Integration
I am running a Samba Box as a Domain Member in a Windows ADS Domain (Windows Server 2003). The Box has joined the ADS domain and the kerberos authentication works, I can see "smbd" processes running with AD user accounts.
But I can not set ACLs on the directories or the files located on the share. If I change them using Windows Explorer, they either will be ignored by samba, or I get the
2008 Sep 29
1
strang locking behaviour with macosx clients
I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a
couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users
told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly
sometimes.
I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags
related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to
be solved yet.
The only