similar to: How to add rfc2307 after a join

Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. Don Kuenz via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a > piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? > On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before

Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 09 Dec 2016 21:52:39 UTC > Don via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> The backup and restore Samba AD DC section of SambaWiki [1] refers to >> ./source4/scripting/bin/samba_backup . Although my recent version of >> samba_backup uses tdbbackup on ldb files, it

Greetings, Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before rsync times out to enable a nightly local backup to complete. The local backup changes a few 512 byte blocks in the 2TB file. That's why the 2TB file is dynamic. As an

Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba 4.8 >> server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a >> network isolated from the Production Server (PS). >> The DR's /var/db/samba4 directory, which contains the private >> directory,

Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File

Rowland penny wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/local/bin/samba-tool", line 33, in <module>

Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Don Kuenz wrote: > >> Samba 4.8. It turns out that both the FreeBSD bin and source packages >> are broke. Fully functional, error free binaries were eventually created >> by manually installing about a dozen requisite packages, one at a time >> along the way, whenever make halted on an error. >> To add to a difficult day, something

Greetings, The process to join a new samba 4.6 DC to an existing samba 4.1 DC repeatedly caused: samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names to fail on the new DC with: Failed to connect host x.x.x.x on port 49152 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Noted: both samba versions are obsolete and will be updated post haste. Regardless, samba_dnsupdate was accidentally invoked on the new DC while the

On 28/05/2020 05:14, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > bind914-9.14.6 and bind-tools-9.14.6 were built and installed on a new > FreeBSD 12.1 samba DC. Then a prebuilt samba410-4.10.13 package was > installed. Both bind-dns/named.conf and BIND9_DLZ libs are missing. Is this using the ZFS filesystem ? If so, how ? What do you mean by 'a prebuilt

Greetings, This post pertains to Samba version 4.16.8 on FreeBSD 13.1. When GPMC.MSC is invoked from within a Windows server domain member, it displays an inconsistency error: <https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8386> <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14927> # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class

I ran some tests to see why getent passwd was not enumerating my domain users and discovered this: If I getent passwd <username> it returns the user information including the primary group defined in the Unix attributes. If I add a Unix GID in the idmap config range to the domain's Domain Users group and getent passwd, it returns all of my domain users with all of the Unix attributes as

You probably want --inplace for this rather than partial. The upside of --partial is that the existing file isn't replaced until there is a complete file to replace it with. The downside is building up that entire new file. On 09/05/2017 12:01 AM, Don Kuenz via rsync wrote: > Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. > > Don

Hello I am working on radio tracking data, with a short programme someone gave me and ... which should, supposedly, work ... In this programme, there is the function : getareahr(kern, levels = 95). But i cannot find any 'getareahr' in R ... could anyone help me? thanks! Agn??s

On 15/11/2019 20:16, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba 4.8 > server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a Just what do you mean by 'provisioned as a standalone host' ? Do you mean 'samba-tool domain provision --server-role=standalone' ? Rowland

I just upgraded to .22.3 from .22.1 and now i got several error messages. I havent found why i got them. Nothing has changed but still there is error and i cannot correct them: err: Package[lsb-release](provider=aptitude): Could not find latest version i run debug: debug: package provider aptitude: Executing ''/usr/bin/dpkg-query -W --showformat ${Status} ${Package} ${Version}\n

--- config.ml.in | 2 +- configure.ac | 2 +- febootstrap_debian.ml | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/config.ml.in b/config.ml.in index a8c008a..262c913 100644 --- a/config.ml.in +++ b/config.ml.in @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ let package_version = "@PACKAGE_VERSION@" let yum = "@YUM@" let rpm = "@RPM@"

Hi all, I suffered a lot for the terrific performance of aptitude on a BTRFS filesystem. I don''t think that BTRFS is a slow filesystem, but it seems that some aptitude (or dpkg) patterns are capable to highlight the btrfs slowness in some corner case. In order to alleviate this problem, I wrote a small script which calls aptitude with the LD_PRELOAD libeatmyadata library. And now I

On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:51:46 +0100 Luis Peromarta via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > All, > > In the past few days I have been experimenting with the mappings in > Samba servers. Today is the DC day. > > Procedure: > > In my setup, I provisioned with rfc2307 schema. In fairness everyone > should, as it?s free, and you can later use it or not. No,

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 20:16 +0000, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba > 4.8 > server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a > network isolated from the Production Server (PS). > The DR's /var/db/samba4 directory, which contains the private > directory, was then

OS name and version, *CentOS release 6.10 (Final) Linux 2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.centos.plus.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 15 02:28:38 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux* exact NUT version Name : nut Arch : x86_64 Version : 2.6.5 Release : 2.el6 Size : 4.2 M Repo : installed >From repo : epel Summary : Network UPS Tools URL :