similar to: Map share based on site?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Map share based on site?"

2018 Apr 12
1
Map share based on site?
Hai Marco, > It is still true that 'samba-tool sites' is 'not recommended' and it i > better to manage sites and subnets with ADSS? Or that page have to/can > be updated? When i look at the page modify date, i say use the RSAT tools. I dont (hardly) use samba-tool here.. I do everything through RSAT tools. > Only a little note: You can target the ip range in the GPO
2018 Apr 12
0
Map share based on site?
Hai Marco, You can do this multiple ways. These are some good basics to read https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/musings_of_a_technical_tam/2012/02/13/group-policy-basics-part-1-understanding-the-structure-of-a-group-policy-object/ https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/musings_of_a_technical_tam/2012/02/15/group-policy-basics-part-2-understanding-which-gpos-to-apply/ ^^ see processing GPO
2018 Nov 19
2
Samba4 multiple DCs replication
Hello I am actually trying to build a multi sites domain. Each additionnal DC has been setup and I would like to hava a custom replication setup. In other words,  how can i choose replication target on a fresh new DC? I would like to force my sites DCs to replicate from master DCs at our office. Is it possible? Thanks Julien
2017 Nov 21
3
Time synchronization and Password Policies
You guys mix to things. > AFAIK is the 'privileges' that are host-specific. Is correct. >the policies are on the domain (in the LDAP data, > the root DN, look at them!). Yes, but only the GPO policies and these are not applied to the samba server. And because of that, samba-tools password settings needs to be set on every DC. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk
2018 Jul 20
4
Samba 4.5 and glusterfs...
Reding the thread in list about gluster, i've found that in your samba packages 4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u2~bpo8+1 there's no vfs_glusterfs module, only the manpage. root at vdmsv1:~# grep glusterfs /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba-vfs-modules.list:/usr/share/man/man8/vfs_glusterfs.8.gz root at vdmsv1:~# grep /vfs/ /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list
2019 Jan 09
3
[Oddity] SAMAccountName and 20+ chars logins...
Reading here i've understod that for LDAP query it is better to use SAMAccountName as 'login', but today i've found: https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/windows/desktop/ADSchema/a-samaccountname so, 'SAMAccountName' is a compatibility field with NT mode, limited to 20 chars. Someone here use 21 chars logins? ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
2018 Jun 21
3
Password complexity checks and local users...
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > But my question really is: why this policy apply, if i've not enabled > > in GPO? > Probably because GPOs have no effect on a Samba AD DC, they will only > effect Windows clients. Rowland, i'm speaking about windows clients, not samba servers! I've enabled 'complexity checks' in samba servers,
2017 Nov 30
4
Troubles on Roaming Profiles...
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Is this on a DC ? No, is a DM. > If it isn't, Try setting it up exactly like it is shown on the > wikipage, note that you only need the 'vfs objects' line if it isn't > set in [global] Wikipage say only: Create a new share. For details, see Setting up a Share Using Windows ACLs. and
2019 Oct 01
5
Upgrade DC 4.5 -> 4.8, timings?
I've read all docs on upgrades, from wiki to Louis notes, and i think i'm ready to upgrade. First step, move from stretch to jessie, and from 4.5 to 4.8, upgrade in place. But having a domain with 6 DCs, i'm a bit scared to upgrade all DC in one turn, and i'm think about something like: a) upgrade DC with FSMO roles, then wait 1-2 day to spot troubles b) then upgrade all DC in
2019 Oct 16
4
vfs_recycle permission bug?!
Samba 4.8 (Louis debian repo), DM. Today i've had to recovery a deleted file in that share, that use 'vfs_recycle' modules: [Work] comment = Spazio di Lavoro Utente map acl inherit = Yes path = /srv/work read only = No store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle full_audit volume = Work full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread
2018 May 14
2
Samba, AD and devices compatibility...
Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I hope this clarifies things, Super-clear! Thanks! -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t
2017 Dec 18
3
DM and ''offline'' PAM (and NSS?)...
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:51:47 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I've seen: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/PAM_Offline_Authentication > > I've tried to enable offline logon, and seems to work as expected. > > I've only found a little strange thing, i think related to the fact > that in my DM i've set
2017 Nov 30
2
Troubles on Roaming Profiles...
i've seen that is similar to your latest test. What about a gpresult -h result.html. The GPo is appplied to the user? Greetings!! 2017-11-30 13:29 GMT+01:00 Daniel Carrasco <d.carrasco at i2tic.com>: > I don't know if is relevant and maybe is the same as GPO that you've > created, but Ive a profiles folder with this configuration: > > [profiles] > path
2018 Sep 04
4
Upgraded a member server to 4.8, rfc2307 data?
I'm starting to upgrade my domain members to debian stretch/samba 4.8, using louis packages. Domain controllers still on jessie/samba45. Upgrade went smooth, but after upgrade seems that the DM was not able anymore to retrieve rfc2307 data, eg: root at vdmsv2:~# getent passwd gaio gaio:*:10000:10513:Marco Gaiarin:/home/LNFFVG/gaio:/bin/false root at vdmsv2:~# ldbsearch -H
2018 Nov 26
3
Different LDAP query in different DC...
I need to do a simple query, against some LDAP data in 'laster draft schema' format i've added to te samba/AD schema. All LDAP query return the same result on all (6) of the DC: root at vdcsv1:~# ldapsearch -H ldap://vdcsv2.ad.fvg.lnf.it -W -D CN=mta,OU=Restricted,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it -b DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it "(cn=prova123)" rfc822MailMember Enter LDAP Password:
2019 Jan 25
3
Removing sites and DC...
I need to close a site. No, no people fired, i've defined sites and DC because i hope that get (re)opened, but... There's some care i need to have to remove a DC (clearly, without FSMO roles)? I've looked on wiki to 'remove a DC' but i was not able to find something... Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra
2019 Dec 10
2
DC in trash...
Debian stretch, louis packages 4.9.16+dfsg-0.1~stretch~1 . After some time (roughly: two weeks) my DC with FSMO roles (seems that other DC are unaffected) goes suddenly on trash: memory jump from 50% (3GB) to 100%, container start to swap and slow down (load 10-15) al the phisical server. A simple restart solve all the troubles. Some hint on how to debug that? Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin
2017 Dec 14
5
[Curiosity] 'netbios aliases' works in AD mode?
Ahem no one reply me. A little fast-rewind: i need to have some 'aliases' to my servers (DM); seems i need to add in smb.conf: netbios aliases = FILESV but also add a 'SPN'; trying to look around for an examples, lead me to ''nothing'', or to examples that seems to me unrelated. Supposing the domain is 'ad.fvg.lnf.it' and the FQDN of the real host is
2019 Feb 15
6
Demoted/removed a DC, and the NS records?
Following: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC i've demoted and removed a DC. Seems all went as expected: root at vdcud1:~# samba-tool domain demote --server=vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it -U gaio Using vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it as partner server for the demotion Password for [LNFFVG\gaio]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it to synchronize
2017 Oct 19
3
Best practice for creating an RO LDAP User in AD...
Caming from Samba in NT mode with OpenLDAP backend i've created a bunch of ''things'' (apps, web tools, ...; but also printers and so on) that rely on reading ''public'' data in LDAP. With OpenLDAP ''public'' was a easy concept: anonymous access was the default, and ACL protect more sensitive data (mostly, passwords). Now i've to redo some