similar to: Backport of all features and bug fixes for kernel client to recent kernels

Hi, I want to use the SMB3 POSIX extensions in the latest Samba (with SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1). By following the user manual, I have added the "posix" mount option when mounting, but it shows the following error messages. Error messages: [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: Server does not support mounting with posix SMB3.11 extensions. [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -95 Mount option:

Dear Rowland, Thanks a lot for your anwswer ! Le 2017-10-17 20:16, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 > "Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : >> > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet >> > support except in the

I have a client with 10+ Windows 10/32-bit clients and 3 Windows 7/32-bit. I converted them today to Samba 4.12, and after some fixes, I now have working shares and roaming profiles for the Win 10 clients. However, the Win7 clients dont get the shares mapped at logon properly (at all). I tried to run the netlogon script manually from Windows/Sysvol/sysvol/<domain>/scripts after mounting the

Hi Jeremy, Hi Steve, Hi Ronnie, thanks for your replies and the profound discussion. I think, it's best to demonstrate my problem case along an real world example: The following log of a console sesssion shows how I am doing the mounts on behalf Linux Kernel CIFS-FS Module on the client side against a Samba 4.5 file server (both running on Debian Stretch 9.8) via SMB/CIFS resp. SMB2 protocol:

Anyone could please help me to set up a samba authing on a ldap server ??? i mean.. someone can point me out a tutorial/howto/notes/tips/anything that can help me set up this together ?? (or at least some part of the adminstration of ldap for samba) well anything will be welcome since i need to set up pretty soon. thanks in advance,

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:02:20 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok thank you. > So, Is my file server with Samba 4.17.12 vulnerable to CVE-2016-2114 > if it is not a DC server? > > To be clear, I don't use any Active Directory domain controller in my > network. Lets see if I can paraphrase the documentation for CVE-2016-2014

Hi, windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make windows 10 support smb3 too? Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-09-13 15:47:34, "John Hodrien" <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Why? This is NOT necessary for win 10 to work. I do not even know if it will >> work with

Dear all, what is about the support for POSIX ACL in Samba protocol implementation of SMB2 and SMB3? >From what I extracted from SNIA and SambaXP developer conference talks and as well as the official Samba Wiki, support for POSIX ACL in SMB2 and SMB3 has been completely abandonned. Am I right? If so, is there any other possibility to allow Linux Clients to natively access access control lists

I have to add noise: Provisioning a DC with sernet 4.1.x called NT1 as max default with me. Am 6. M?rz 2015 18:28:55 MEZ, schrieb James <lingpanda101 at gmail.com>: >OK. Now I'm really confused. I was not aware of two 'testparm' >commands. >Running 'testparm -v' shows correct default values. So whats the >difference? > > >On 3/6/2015 12:20 PM,

Hi all, My server machine is running samba version 4.4.4 on Linux with 'smb encryption = mandatory' option. My client is a Ubuntu 16.10 Linux machine. I am looking for a way to mount the encrypted samba share on the Linux client machine. I noticed that mount.cifs does not support encryption but smbclient does with an -e flag, however it seems to only be usable in a ftp-like interface.

Hello, How secure is SMB3 over Internet? I see that Microsoft Azure is doing SMB3 shares over internet so they seem to think it's secure. Does the SAMBA team recommend this type of scenario OR do they recommend instead running it over a SSH tunnel/VPN?

Hi, I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? Thanks! Regards Andrew

hi Michael Adam: Thanks for you work on samba. Here I am looking for some advice and your help. I have been stuck in continuous availability of samba 4.3.9 for two weeks. Continuous availability in SMB3 is an attractive feature and I am strugling to enable it. smb.conf, ctdb.conf are attached. Cluster file system is cephfs and mount to /CephStorage client: Windows 8 Pro root at node0:~# samba

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:43:34PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:23:50AM -0700, Andy Qian via samba wrote: > > The smbcacls cmd worked before till recently. Due to the recent Windows > > patch which disables SMB v1, we have to add the following line into the > > [global] section in smb.conf file on Linux machine so that

Hi All, The man page for smb.conf says that 'client max protocol = default' is the same as 'client max protocol = NT1' for the HEAD samba version. Is there some reason I should not change that to SMB3? Thanks! Chad.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:03:41AM -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > Check out the latest cifsfs code. I think Steve > and Aurelian and Ronnie added an ioctl for this. > > I'm here at Vault in Boston with Steve, I'll ask > him :-). Steve says there are two utilities in Linux, getcifsacl and setcifsacl that use a custom ioctl inside the Linux cifsfs kernel

Hi all, Quick question - does Samba server still support Unix extensions when connecting over SMB3? My Linux client recently got upgraded to a CIFS module version that uses SMB3 by default, and since then I lost the ability to create symlinks on my CIFS shares. Running "mount" shows the share mounted with the "nounix" option. If I follow the advice in dmesg and add the

Hi, I am running samba-4.1.4 on my Fedora OS. I have provided the "client max protocol = SMB3" and "server max protocol = SMB3" parameters in smb.conf file I'm able to get only SMB2.1 packets using wireshark after fileshare access from my windows 7 machine. And not SMB3 packets. SMB2->NegotiateProtocol Response 0x0202 0x0210 Samba-4.1.4 is supporting SMB3 also. So

Hi Marc, I'm a little confused. The values I provided for client and server max protocol are default values. At least according to the command 'samba-tool testparm -v'. I have not explicitly set them in my smb.conf file. I assume SMB3 became the default at some point with a release? I'm worried now that I must make explicit changes to my smb.conf file when default values are

Using Wireshark I see the protocol used as SMB2. Using a Windows workstation I tested by navigating to files and folders on my member server or to my sysvol folder on a DC. On 3/6/2015 8:56 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 06/03/15 13:36, James wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> I'm a little confused. The values I provided for client and server >> max protocol are default