similar to: Samba 4 ACL with RHEL 7 XFS

Hi, I was wondering if anyone knew why there would be so many Samba (smbd) processes running on my SCO OpenServer 5.0.5 system? I found an awful lot of them running, much more that what I would expect given the number of Windows PC's on the network. One of the users was having trouble accessing a file on the SCO system, and that is when I discovered this. I actually had to write a program

Hello, Starting to use Samba 4 on RHEL 7. I noticed that new files do not get refreshed automatically for display in a Windows directory listing on Samba 4, and requires a manual refresh in Windows for them to appear. This behavior appears to be different from RHEL 5 (Samba 3), where new files appear automatically. Is there a new global directive in Samba 4 for an automatic directory content

Thank you for the reply. I would prefer a RHEL 7 Samba 4 directive to address this. Like a global directive. We have a good amount of Windows workstations of different version involved, I do not want to have to change them all. We do not use AD (large workgroup). I have only tested with Windows 7 (my workstation). My concern is merely a difference in behavior between RHEL 5 (Samba 3), and

I have an internal Samba installation where I have security=share, and have everything going to a guest account, which I've made a "regular" user and password. I can can copy and move files, but I can't delete any files. I was expecting Samba to follow the permissions of the user, which should be able to delete these files. I've enclosed my smb.conf. The internal (guest)

I have an internal Samba installation where I have security=share, and have everything going to a guest account, in which I've made as user called "samba". When connected to a samba share on my UNIX system, I can can copy and move files using my XP client, but I can't delete files? I was expecting Samba to follow the permissions of the user, which should be able to delete these

Looks like you didn't really understand Marc's answer. This depends on settings on the Windows client. On the server side, this is not a question of changing behaviour, it's a question of Samba 4 supporting a new feature, SMBv2. I suppose that the only thing you can do on the server side is setting max protocol to SMBv1, which is really bad for performance and for security. People

Looks like you didn't really understand Marc's answer. This depends on settings on the Windows client. On the server side, this is not a question of changing behaviour, it's a question of Samba 4 supporting a new feature, SMBv2. I suppose that the only thing you can do on the server side is setting max protocol to SMBv1, which is really bad for performance and for security. People

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:08:33PM +0100, Fabien Dupont wrote: > Hi, > > I'm experiencing a weird behavior when tried to use guestmount with a XFS > formatted volume. I have created a RHEL 8 virtual machine using libvirt. I > have retrieved the disk image on a RHEL 7.7 server to mount the image root > filesystem and explore it. > > The command returns an error

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

hi, I've recently set up a SAMBA/PDC domain controler with LDAP. My homes shares are in a XFS quota/acl enabled filesystem setfacl/getfacl works onto the linux Mandrake 9.2 box well, I mean user with more permissions set into ACL can write to the directory concerned. My problem is that ACL file permissions seems to not be readed by Samba when accessing files with a w2k box. here is more

Hallo, I have to shares: fstab.conf: /dev/sdb1 /mnt/xfs xfs defaults 0 1 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/ext3 ext3 defaults 0 1 smb.conf: [global] create mask = 0777 force create mode = 00 security mask = 0777 force security mode = 00 directory mask = 0777 force directory mode = 00 directory security mask = 0777 force directory security mode = 00 inherit permissions = No inherit acls = No

Hola folks, I've been attempting to put together a test server to see how well Samba 2.2.5 plays with NT domains. I'm running Gentoo Linux 1.2 on a Compaq ProLiant 3000, and my test fileshare is on an XFS partition. The server has successfully joined our test domain and is able to list accounts/groups properly via getent. I am also able to log on to the server using an NT account.

For those of you running Gentoo Linux: Be sure you compile your kernel from xfs-sources and not gentoo-sources. Now that I've recompiled from the xfs-sources package, Problem #1 has gone away. One lingering problem: I can't remove 'Take Ownership' or 'Read' permissions away from the Everyone and 'Domain Users' group on files that I create via NT Explorer. Who

Software: - Samba 3.0 (Stable) - OpenLDAP 2.0.27 - Windows 2000 clients I'd like to impliment full-blown nt-style permissions on my existing Samba (with LDAP backend) server / shares. (i.e. file properties--> security: different groups / users, with different permissions etc. etc.) Now I've dug around and found that this can be supported either via ext2/3 + some ACL patch (anyone got

Paul, Your samba does have ACLs support built-in. Please check that your system has the ACLs support libraries. Since you are using kernel 2.4.x you need to have the bestbits acls support libraries installed on your machine. Check the documentation for XFS to see how to mount the XFS file system so it has ACLs support. You should manually be able to set POSIX ACLs using the setfacls utility.

Hello, I am trying to setup Samba as a fileserver in a Win2k PDC environment. I am using Samba-2.2.2 under linux kernel 2.4.14 patched for XFS. I am doing this so that I can make use of ACLs. winbind is setup and everything works as expected, ie `getent passwd` and `getend group` return all the domain users and groups. Domain users can create files and store their profiles and such. Here

Hi, I'm experiencing a weird behavior when tried to use guestmount with a XFS formatted volume. I have created a RHEL 8 virtual machine using libvirt. I have retrieved the disk image on a RHEL 7.7 server to mount the image root filesystem and explore it. The command returns an error message: # guestmount -a /disks/jamesdream.qcow2 -m /dev/sda1 /mnt/ libguestfs: error: mount_options: mount

Hi Could you list the RPM you have installed dor ACL support ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467

Purpose: Create a File Server that can replace our windows file server. System Details: RedHat 8 Kernel 2.4.18-18 SGI XFS 1.2.0 2 disks 1 for the filesystem ext3 1 for the shares using xfs Most of the threads and articles I read about doing this told me that I had to recompile the kernel for acl support. Then I found a post that mention that XFS has built in ACL support. Which

Hi all, again. I am trying to set up samba with acl-support on a debian woody (final) box. The kernel has got XFS-support and getfacl and setfacl are working fine since I have built the acl-debian packages from SGI's acl-sources. Also attr-dev, acl-dev and the appropriate kernel-headers are installed. The acl.h can be found in /usr/include/sys/. But all my efforts trying to implement xfs