similar to: Migrating server

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > Hi Guys, > Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not > sure if it is valid > > Here is what we are planning, high level > Phase1: > > - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing > domain > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3

Hi Andrew, I've setup a new Samba 4 box (sam4dc) on Ubuntu 14.04 with Samba 4.3.11. I have the following Just to clarify, sam3DC is the current DC with samba 3.6.3 smb.conf [global] workgroup = STEST netbios name = Sam4DC password server = Sam3DC (This is the current DC) security = user resolv.conf nameserver = 192.168.10.1 (IP of Sam3DC) I can ping the sam3dc from the

Hi Andrew, Thank you for that. So it doesn't matter if I have TDB as my DB? Also, how do I replicate the data? Copy and paste ? /vat/lib/samba ,/private , passwd and group files? On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Have not had any feedback on

Dear WizaRds, I am struggling with the use of twophase in package survey. My goal is to compute a simple example in two phase sampling: phase 1: I sample n1=1000 circuit boards and find 80 non functional phase 2: Given the n1=1000 sample I sample n2=100 and find 15 non functional. Let's say, phase 2 shows this result together with phase 1: ...................phase1........

Hi Guys, Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not sure if it is valid https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/old/Samba3-HOWTO/samba-bdc.html We have an upcoming project to migrate Samba first into a new Hardware then the AD migration. Our hardware is old and we need to migrate. Please allow me to explain the current setup - Server : Physical - OS: Ubuntu 12.04 running

The raspberry Pi2 is an armv7a chip (Cortex-A7), the first stage builds fine with the native g++ (if not a little slowly at 10+ hours), but it crashes at some point with this command line: Program arguments: /home/ben/development/llvm/3.6.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.install/bin/clang -cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -emit-obj -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think having -Werror bots is a good idea, at least when self hosting. > Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC, > etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those > warnings if the warning is the problem). On Tue, Mar

Hi all, Our customer wants to install a VPN server on Centos 5 box. This is what the remote site says. pls read below. We now have the new firewall & router installed in our office, that supports a secure VPN connection. We need to enter your Peer IP and your Private IP in our device. They indicated xxxx.xxxx.xxxx/24 as format for the Private IP. The settings you need to know at our end

I just changed this build on green dragon to warn and email if warnings are found in the console log: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_build/ > On Mar 22, 2016, at 6:24 PM, David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

Am 09.01.24 um 09:14 schrieb Thomas Hellstr?m: > Hi, Christian > > On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 08:47 +0100, Christian K?nig wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm trying to make this functionality a bit more useful for years now >> since we multiple reports that behavior of drivers can be suboptimal >> when multiple placements be given. >> >> So basically

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 3 Aug 2018, at 13:37, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). >> >> It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the >> status is of the branch

Dear WizaRds, I tried to construct a two-phase sampling design in Survey just the way I hoped understood in Vienna - I was wrong. I think I am too stupid to create the correct subset for phase 2. Phase1: Sample 1000 parts with 80 defective. Phase2: Sample 100 parts out of these 1000 with 15 defective. 0:ok, 1:defunct. The table below gives the conditional sampling values. Please help me:

In this code i try to calculate le difference between too number for two value of  th variable phase i have did this > (output <- read.csv2("C:/RM2Param.csv",sep=","))   OptimYear LRPhase   PriorLRPosition      OptimPosition 1      2009      -1  1.15641679414676  0.252662968666702 2      2009      -1  1.05365365779321  0.119348307634027 3      2009      -1

Hi! i have 3 dcs with samba i demote bdc and replace it with dc2 with de same ip the replicate with dc1 is ok, and the replicate of dc3 with dc1 is ok, the problem is in dc2 with dc3 i found the problem, but i dont known how fixes when i do samba-tools drs showrepl in dc3 i see in connection appears the old dc named bdc and dont appears the new, dc2 i try with samba-tool drs replicate but

My thought was that its reasonable to expect no warnings when building from bootstrap (as you say) and the last release of Clang. Generally, I think we should work around warnings in the last release of Clang if only for the convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using Werror. Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and from GCC in order to keep

Thanks But this is for demoting a PDC to a BDC. I've done that already. What I want to demote my BDCs to standalone server. I'll give a try to upromote. Kind regards Julien -------- Message d'origine-------- De: andreas oster [mailto:aoster@novanetwork.de] Date: lun. 26/07/2004 16:44 ?: samba@lists.samba.org Cc: Objet: Re: RE : [Samba] Samba as a PDC / Windows NT 4

On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:11:36 -0400 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:45 PM, Carlos Bordon via samba wrote: > > Hi! > > > > i have 3 dcs with samba > > > > > > i demote bdc and replace it with dc2 with de same ip > > > > the replicate with dc1 is ok, and the replicate of dc3 with dc1 is > > ok,

I have no idea whatsoever as to why racoon/IKE does not work here. I've tried various how-to documents but found nothing that works for me. Gateway (10.0.0.1) running 4.9-stable. Laptop (10.0.0.10) running 5.2.1-release. Both running racoon-20040408a On the gateway 10.0.0.1 # cat /etc/ipsec.conf add 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.10 esp 691 -E rijndael-cbc "1234567890123456" -A hmac-sha1

>>I have a client in a similar situation. NT4 PDC w/Exchange 5.5 and Samba member servers. Main problem is that >>they're running an old custom Outlook/Exchange workflow app which locks them in until it can be replaced. Similar situation - though we've been able to replicate it fairly easily in google apps. >>As you're aware newer then XP cannot join an NT4 domain