similar to: Migrating server

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > Hi Guys, > Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not > sure if it is valid > > Here is what we are planning, high level > Phase1: > > - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing > domain > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3

Hi Andrew, I've setup a new Samba 4 box (sam4dc) on Ubuntu 14.04 with Samba 4.3.11. I have the following Just to clarify, sam3DC is the current DC with samba 3.6.3 smb.conf [global] workgroup = STEST netbios name = Sam4DC password server = Sam3DC (This is the current DC) security = user resolv.conf nameserver = 192.168.10.1 (IP of Sam3DC) I can ping the sam3dc from the

Hi Andrew, Thank you for that. So it doesn't matter if I have TDB as my DB? Also, how do I replicate the data? Copy and paste ? /vat/lib/samba ,/private , passwd and group files? On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Have not had any feedback on

Hi Guys, Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not sure if it is valid https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/old/Samba3-HOWTO/samba-bdc.html We have an upcoming project to migrate Samba first into a new Hardware then the AD migration. Our hardware is old and we need to migrate. Please allow me to explain the current setup - Server : Physical - OS: Ubuntu 12.04 running

Dear WizaRds, I am struggling with the use of twophase in package survey. My goal is to compute a simple example in two phase sampling: phase 1: I sample n1=1000 circuit boards and find 80 non functional phase 2: Given the n1=1000 sample I sample n2=100 and find 15 non functional. Let's say, phase 2 shows this result together with phase 1: ...................phase1........

The raspberry Pi2 is an armv7a chip (Cortex-A7), the first stage builds fine with the native g++ (if not a little slowly at 10+ hours), but it crashes at some point with this command line: Program arguments: /home/ben/development/llvm/3.6.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.install/bin/clang -cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -emit-obj -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think having -Werror bots is a good idea, at least when self hosting. > Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC, > etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those > warnings if the warning is the problem). On Tue, Mar

Hi all, Our customer wants to install a VPN server on Centos 5 box. This is what the remote site says. pls read below. We now have the new firewall & router installed in our office, that supports a secure VPN connection. We need to enter your Peer IP and your Private IP in our device. They indicated xxxx.xxxx.xxxx/24 as format for the Private IP. The settings you need to know at our end

I just changed this build on green dragon to warn and email if warnings are found in the console log: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_build/ > On Mar 22, 2016, at 6:24 PM, David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

Am 09.01.24 um 09:14 schrieb Thomas Hellstr?m: > Hi, Christian > > On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 08:47 +0100, Christian K?nig wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm trying to make this functionality a bit more useful for years now >> since we multiple reports that behavior of drivers can be suboptimal >> when multiple placements be given. >> >> So basically

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 3 Aug 2018, at 13:37, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). >> >> It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the >> status is of the branch

Dear WizaRds, I tried to construct a two-phase sampling design in Survey just the way I hoped understood in Vienna - I was wrong. I think I am too stupid to create the correct subset for phase 2. Phase1: Sample 1000 parts with 80 defective. Phase2: Sample 100 parts out of these 1000 with 15 defective. 0:ok, 1:defunct. The table below gives the conditional sampling values. Please help me:

In this code i try to calculate le difference between too number for two value of  th variable phase i have did this > (output <- read.csv2("C:/RM2Param.csv",sep=","))   OptimYear LRPhase   PriorLRPosition      OptimPosition 1      2009      -1  1.15641679414676  0.252662968666702 2      2009      -1  1.05365365779321  0.119348307634027 3      2009      -1

My thought was that its reasonable to expect no warnings when building from bootstrap (as you say) and the last release of Clang. Generally, I think we should work around warnings in the last release of Clang if only for the convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using Werror. Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and from GCC in order to keep

I have no idea whatsoever as to why racoon/IKE does not work here. I've tried various how-to documents but found nothing that works for me. Gateway (10.0.0.1) running 4.9-stable. Laptop (10.0.0.10) running 5.2.1-release. Both running racoon-20040408a On the gateway 10.0.0.1 # cat /etc/ipsec.conf add 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.10 esp 691 -E rijndael-cbc "1234567890123456" -A hmac-sha1

Guys, We have a Samba 4 PDC with TDB backend. We're now trying to a BDC so we need to migrate from TDB to LDAP . I've read the Samba documentation which says using tdb in both servers will cause issues. So the question is how do we migrate from TDB to LDAP in the PDC. The setup we are going for is each DC will have LDAP setup. The LDAP servers will then be replicated. Reading the official

Hi, I am new to ipsec and trying to connect my bsd server with win 2000. I have succeeded to tunnel using pre-shared key. But regarding certificate , I failed to get success. The following are configuration : racoon.conf path certificate "/usr/local/openssl/certs" ; # "log" specifies logging level. It is followed by either "notify",

Dear testers, 4.0.0-rc1 was just tagged from the branch, with r292377. There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the testing started to see what issues come up. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how it goes. I'll upload source, docs, and your binaries to the web site once their ready. Thanks, Hans

Hi Guys, Have some issues with winbind and nss-ldap in LDAP based NT4 BDC/fileserver The DC has the LDAP server role and the BDC connects to it for authentication. smb.conf of the BDC netbios name = TRAC5 local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no domain logons = no passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://trac15.ste.com ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=ste,d=com