similar to: Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership"

2018 Feb 12
3
domain users issue
Hi, If you try net group /domain "Domain Users" in samba domain with domain users as primary group any user is showed, but If you try the same in a native AD then users are listed, try this to reproduce the error Thanks 2018-02-12 20:24 GMT+01:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>: > Hi Rowland, > > Not really sure if that is correct, tried with native AD and domain
2018 Feb 12
2
domain users issue
Not possible, I do not have a Windows AD DC, but I don't doubt it works, probably because windows has a similar work around to 'samba-tool group listmembers Domain\ Users' --> Correct this command returns correctly the users Can you create a file on the netapp that ends up belonging to 'username:Domain Users' ? --> Correct fiel created without issues Does 'getent
2018 Feb 12
4
domain users issue
Hi, Using a samba 4, and having users configured as primary group domain users (513) we detected that then if you execute net group /domain "Domain Users" then user is not showed in as member of domain users, if you remove from primary group and assign another group then with net group /domain "Domain Users" you can list this user as member. This generates that for example
2018 Feb 12
0
domain users issue
Is not a permission issue, because if you replace primary group then works, It seems a bug related with priamry group and domain users, then not listed and permission not applied because is not working, tried with native AD windows 2008 and then error not reproduced net group /domain "Domain users" lists correctly users also if they have doamin users as primary groups Thanks 2018-02-12
2018 Feb 12
0
domain users issue
Hi, additional information, creating a new file or folder with full permission to domain user both are not usable (permission denied), then if you add permission at level user then works, It seems that issue is only with domain users as primary group Thanks 2018-02-12 21:21 GMT+01:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>: > Not possible, I do not have a Windows AD DC, but I don't
2018 Feb 12
0
domain users issue
Hi Rowland, Not really sure if that is correct, tried with native AD and domain users are showed also if they have domain users as primary group, IT seems a samba bug liek It was described here https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-October/211699.html Any suggestion about how to solve, other groups are working OK, but seems that with netapp cdot domain users are not usable, and this is a
2018 Feb 13
2
high cpu usage samba 4 AD
OK, Thanks for your information. If I remove this new group with 3500 users, I understand that load will be recovered to normal usage, correct? About upgrade if I have only one server with 4.4.5 the best option is add another dc with 4.7 compiled, then transfer and upgrade (or join old server) or upgrade actual 4.4.5 to 4.7 and then add a new dc? I like to keep 2 dc with same config and fully
2020 Apr 26
0
Hello
<div dir="auto">Sure, let's start with a couple of questions:<div><br></div><div>how far through this document did you get? http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.1/basic-setup.html</div><div><br></div><div>What OS are you planning on using, windows or
2020 Apr 26
2
Hello
Hello. My name is Yarin. I want to setup the app to create my station. the explanation is not clear. Can you help me please from the beginning? Thank you <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com
2020 Jun 15
2
Streams dropping out after 8-12 seconds in Edge, IE
Hi Is anyone experiencing Icecast streams dropping out after about 8-12 seconds in Edge or IE? It's fine in Chrome or Firefox. It's also fine in the new Chromium based Edge. I have a number of listeners reporting it. It also happens on some of the streams in the http://dir.xiph.org/ Icecast directory (Alt Rock 97, Wakefield FM, KBSU, 80s 90s Hit Radio etc.). Here's one of my stream
2020 Jun 15
2
Streams dropping out after 8-12 seconds in Edge, IE
<div dir="auto">For what it's worth, it's working in NZ/vodafone/android firefox for me<br></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Gavin Stephens <gavin@stephens.net.nz><br>Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 15:59<br>To: icecast@xiph.org<br>Subject: Re: [Icecast]
2017 Oct 20
0
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:02:45 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > we are testing a new AD domain that will replace our old NT4 one, and > we are setting up a new cifs vserver of our Netapp filer (running > Clustered Dataontap 9.2). > > The new AD domain was a clean deployment created using "samba-tool > domain provision
2017 Oct 23
0
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > On 10/20/2017 05:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> So I tried what is suggested in this thread: > >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/thread.html#199609 > > > > I really should have said there that using '513' wasn't a good
2017 Oct 23
2
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
On 10/23/2017 09:29 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > All that using '--use-rfc2307' does is allow the use of rfc2307 > attributes such as 'uidNumber' and 'gidNumber', it does not > populate any of the rfc2307 attributes. > > DCs works slightly different from Unix domain members, they use > 'xidNumber' attributes in idmap.ldb, these attributes
2017 Oct 24
0
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:27:18 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > On 10/23/2017 10:26 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > OK, have you tried asking the Netapp company, 'how do I use this > > with Active Directory' ? > > In this specific case no, but I already tried to open CIFS support > cases but at the end they tell me
2017 Oct 23
2
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
On 10/20/2017 05:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> So I tried what is suggested in this thread: >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/thread.html#199609 > > I really should have said there that using '513' wasn't a good idea ;-) ok I'll revert to 100 ;-) > The only way to get the same IDs everywhere is to use the winbind >
2017 Oct 20
0
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:47:43 +0200 Giuseppe Ravasio <giuseppe_ravasio at ch.modiano.com> wrote: > Sorry for eventually wrong AD terminology! Don't worry about it, it is just confusing when you call a DC, a PDC, call it your first DC or anything, just don't call it a PDC ;-) > > > You haven't fixed the 'xidNumber:100 issue', giving 'Domain Users'
2017 Oct 24
2
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
On 10/23/2017 10:26 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > OK, have you tried asking the Netapp company, 'how do I use this with > Active Directory' ? In this specific case no, but I already tried to open CIFS support cases but at the end they tell me that It works as expected with a MS DC and that Samba DC is not supported by them. I cannot omit that I use Samba because they always
2017 Oct 20
2
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
Hi, we are testing a new AD domain that will replace our old NT4 one, and we are setting up a new cifs vserver of our Netapp filer (running Clustered Dataontap 9.2). The new AD domain was a clean deployment created using "samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 ...". All seems to work well and the Netapp filer joins the domain without errors and seems to run fine.
2017 Oct 20
2
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
Sorry for eventually wrong AD terminology! > You haven't fixed the 'xidNumber:100 issue', giving 'Domain Users' the > ID of '513' is not a good idea and I think you may have just changed > '100' in idmap.ldb to '513' >From the AD DC (;-)) shell the user was missing the "Domain Users" group and we tought that could be a xidNumber