similar to: The "10 hour problem"

Ah. Anyway, the patch is pretty straight forward (and you could probably write a better one :-). But anyway, here’s a link to a web page where it can be downloaded from in case someone else needs it / wants to have a look: https://people.ifm.liu.se/peter/patches/samba/ <https://people.ifm.liu.se/peter/patches/samba/> (socket_listen_backlog.patch) It’s based on Samba 4.7.3 currently. —

Is it normal that the gencache.tdb should grow and grow “forever” and fill up with “RA/<hex>” posts? I’ve been investigating why our Samba 4.7.3 servers (happened with older version 4 servers too) would use such insane amounts of memory on our FreeBSD 11.1 servers (we see smbd processes using hundreds of megabytes of RAM and up to 5GB virtual memory). Anyway, one part that seems to use

There are a number of rather low listen() queue limits in Samba which we also ran into on our pretty busy (around 300-500 users/server) Samba servers, also on FreeBSD 11.1 (six servers with 256GB RAM, 2x10Gbit ethernet, 140TB of storage). Please find enclosed a patch we use to up the limits (quite a bit). The patch makes it possible to control the queue limit via the config file using a “socket

On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 22:56 +0100, Peter Eriksson via samba wrote: > There are a number of rather low listen() queue limits in Samba which we also ran into on our pretty busy (around 300-500 users/server) Samba servers, also on FreeBSD 11.1 (six servers with 256GB RAM, 2x10Gbit ethernet, 140TB of storage). > > Please find enclosed a patch we use to up the limits (quite a bit). Sadly

Just got another core-dump from Dovecot's imap process on our mail server. Dovecot 2.2.20 Solaris 10 / x86 Maildir Output from syslog: Dec 14 10:58:12 mail dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.crit] imap(oling): Panic: file imap-fetch.c: line 554: assertion failed: (ctx->client->output_cmd_lock == NULL || ctx->client->output_cmd_lock == cmd) Dec 14 10:58:15 mail dovecot: [ID 583609

Hi, I'm trying to use the current version of dovecot as the IMAP server for Kolab and things seem to be working more or less OK, but while working on it I've found a dovecot bug that can probably be fixed quickly by someone familiar with the code. I've found the problem using shared folders, but it is related to ACLs and METADATA. The problem appears when a user only has the

Hello list members! I joined this list on May 1st and I can see I have a lot to learn. Thanks to everyone - especially those *@samba.org folks. You are so appreciated. Background in my plea for help: I'm the IT guy for a family owned community bank in Southern Colorado. I am very tired of the limitations and security problems of Micro$oft and have committed to learning and using Linux

When I use the next code to print all the opcode name in a file xx.o whose source file contains statements "if (diff != 0) klee_assume(diff>0)", then an opcode name 'and' was printed. Where is the 'and' instruction from? I checked the file xx.ll of xx.o and I didn't find a 'and' instruction of these two statements. Besides, when I commented out statement

Dear R What does NaN mean? I recently did a correlation on a batch of data for some reason it didn't like one column cor(sleep,use="complete.obs") BodyWt BrainWt SlowSleep ParaSleep TotalSleep BodyWt 1.00000000 0.95584875 -0.3936373 -0.07488845 -0.3428373 BrainWt 0.95584875 1.00000000 -0.3867947 -0.07427740 -0.3370815 SlowSleep -0.39363729

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93373 Bug ID: 93373 Summary: sometimes hickup with persistent garbaby Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee:

Greetings, I am Iti Shree, sophomore year student pursuing Information and Technology.I was browsing through Xapian GSoC 2019 Ideas Page and found a really interesting project - "Matcher Optimisations" I have done quite a few projects in C++ and C source. Previous summer I worked for apertus Association in GSoC and my project was in C. Here is my github profile link:

Dear R-help, I am trying to estimate a Cox model with nested effects basing on the minimization of the overall AIC; I have two frailties terms, both gamma distributed. There is a error message (theta2 argument misses) and I don?t understand why. I would like to know what I have wrong. Thank you very much for your time. fitM7 <- coxph(Surv(lifespan,censured) ~ south + frailty(id,

We just noticed an interesting bug/misfeature on our Samba 4.9.4 servers (FreeBSD 11.2). The same effect is also visible on Samba 4.8.3 on CentOS 7. Start with a directory that looks like this: root at filur00:/tmp/test # ls -la total 50 drwxrwx--- 2 peter86 uf-iti-all 3 Feb 27 11:27 . drwxrwxrwt 10 root wheel 56 Feb 27 16:41 .. -rw-rw---- 1 mikha02 uf-iti-all 6 Feb 27 11:27

I'm using the latest version of dovecot (2.2.15) and I was trying to use a public namespace with metadata; I've found that it works for the users with enough permissions to set the metadata, but the values are set per user, that is, each user has its own metadata and does not see the values set by others. That sounds OK, as my mail_attribute_dict is configured as follows:

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:53:48 +0100 Peter Eriksson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > We just noticed an interesting bug/misfeature on our Samba 4.9.4 > servers (FreeBSD 11.2). The same effect is also visible on Samba > 4.8.3 on CentOS 7. > > Start with a directory that looks like this: > > root at filur00:/tmp/test # ls -la > total 50 > drwxrwx--- 2

Hi, "Asterisk 1.8.10.0-1digium1~squeeze built by pbuilder @ nighthawk on a x86_64 running Linux on 2012-03-08 23:05:09 UTC" We have some problem when running a AGI script (build with PHP), existing channels (all of them) gets a "hickup" and then continues. We are using AGI to lookup incoming calls in directory. It is kinda annoying, and I don't understand how it can be

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via openssh-unix-dev wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently evaluating using `ssh-keygen -Y verify` to check OS artifacts > (e.g. packages) and I noticed that the `-f allowed_signers_file` option can be > passed only once. A side remark: technically it can be passed multiple times > without a warning but the last invocation overrides all

Fyi, re: fedora lifespan http://www.linuxlookup.com/2007/may/03/fedora_core_5_end_of_life - rh -- Abba Communications Spokane, WA www.abbacomm.net

Can I get people from other platforms to test the waitpid.patch to see if it solves hang-on-exit on their platform? I can confirm Solaris at this moment (but I've not done heavy testing at this moment) that is works like a charm (Solaris 7). It handles 'sleep 90&' vs 'nohup sleep 90&' correctly (killed, vs left). thanks. - Ben ---------- Forwarded message

We have a setup with a bunch of Dell servers acting as fileserver for the university here, running FreeBSD with Samba (and NFS & SFTP) to provide service for staff & students. This works in general really (very) well. We have around 4000-5000 SMB connections spread over 6 servers during “rush hours” (8am-5pm). However, due to some strange (I bet it’s due to the service ticket timeout)