similar to: Windows server 2003 domain authentication with Samba version 4.7.0-git.23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64

Dear Mr. Cardon! Na štvrtok, 9. novembra 2017 18:29:03 CET Denis Cardon via samba napísali: > > > IO would like to ask for help with diagnose why my Samba version > > 4.7.0-git. > > 23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 in openSUSE Tumbleweed can not > > authentificate me on Windows server 2003 domain > > > > in /etc/fstab I have working combination - smb

---------- Preposlaná správa ---------- Predmet: Re: [Samba] Windows server 2003 domain authentication with Samba version 4.7.0-git.23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 Dátum: piatok, 10. novembra 2017, 10:32:48 CET Od: Pre: L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 10:07:22 CET L.P.H. van Belle via samba napísali: > > You could try to add AES256 support

Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 10:03:03 CET Rowland Penny via samba napísali: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:51:14 +0100 > > "Peter Fodrek,ml. via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Dear Mr. Cardon! > > Na štvrtok, 9. novembra 2017 18:29:03 CET Denis Cardon via samba > > > > napísali: > > > > IO would like to ask for help with

Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 11:07:13 CET Rowland Penny via samba napísali: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:39:10 +0100 > > wrote: > > > You should have said that in the first place, I thought it was a > > > CIFS problem ;-) > > > > > > Can you please post your smb.conf > > > > it is set by yast and its only content is as follows. It may be

On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:38:00 +0100 wrote: > Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 11:07:13 CET Rowland Penny via samba > napísali: > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:39:10 +0100 > > > > wrote: > > > > You should have said that in the first place, I thought it was a > > > > CIFS problem ;-) > > > > > > > > Can you please post your smb.conf

Dear Mr. Chisnall! thank you for you help V Nedeľa, 26. máj 2013 o 15:33 +0100, David Chisnall napísal(a): > On 26 May 2013, at 14:42, Peter Fodrek-CHELLO <peter.fodrek at chello.sk> wrote: > > > We have same problem that we are to port third party C++ user space code > > into Linux kernel code where is only available to use C source code. > If you want to get your

Dear LLVM experts! we would like to use BeignetBackend as and LLVM Target It shown in teh Beignet code there is a note "Well, the complete code base is somehow a compiler backend for LLVM. Here, we really speak about the final code generation passes that you may find in `src/backend`." http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/Backend/compiler_backe nd/ But Beignet does not

Dear LLVM users and developers, We have been read that there is possible to translate from C++ to another language using Clang http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9900240/how-to-use-clang-to-translate-from-c-to-another-language We have same problem that we are to port third party C++ user space code into Linux kernel code where is only available to use C source code. I would like to be informed

hi folks! i got my samba-pdc up and running. its cool working with windows-clients. except one usb-printer i struggle with everything seems to work. But, i would like to authentificate even my linux-clients via samba. how do i do this? each machine has got its account on the samba-pdc (...the machine$...) all are net joined...(except one which i get the error-message no usable server...) so,

Hi, I'm trying to setup IMC (idealx management console) to give our windows admins some nice toy to play with, but I have problem to make it work. I can log in after I authentificate as Administrator, but, I can't modify any LDAP entries, as that fails with unsufficient privileges due to the IMC trying to bind to LDAP as logged in user (Administrator), instead of something like

Dear listmembers, a few weeks ago i've installed a server based on openSUSE 10.0 and Samba 3.0.20 in addition to two existing Windows 2003 servers. My aim is to replace the Windows servers in medium term. The Samba server uses Kerberos v5 to authentificate the users against the W2003-Server. The W2003-Server ist the primary domain controller, the other W2K3-server is the "backup domain

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Currently some of our organizational roles uses shared secrets (aka the password) to access the mail account of an organizational role, say "sales" for example. For one, I don't like shared secrets, for second, there had been some changes to shared mailboxes, I can only say "user sales has deleted the message at then and

Hello, I have a question about netbios browsing in samba4. When I follow Samba4/Franky Howto I'm unable to browse my domain on windows clients (Win XP, 7). I see no computers in my domain in Network places. It wrotes that I have not permission to use this network resources (even for Domain Admins). I have "option netbios-dd-server 192.168.1.131; option netbios-node-type 2;" in

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:00:40PM +0100, Andrei Perietanu wrote: > >> Hi Andrea, >> Thanks for the reply; >> To shed some more light on the matter I performed a few more tests; each >> time doing a clean install. I installed ubuntu14.04 as the guest OS, >> keeping

On 9/24/20 1:06 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > OK, you are using users & groups in the 1000-29999 range, why ? could > it be that you have the same users in /etc/passwd and AD ? On my Linux installs, I allow for a 'local' account with user id 1000. That is the only local account and is used for installing the OS (or in case AD is down). All other user/group accounts are

We've had a number of changes since the last release, and we have some other upcoming kernel changes that might require corresponding cifs-utils changes. So it's probably as good a time as any for a new release. Highlights: + fix for a minor security issue that can corrupt the mtab + new getcifsacl/setcifsacl tools that allow you to fetch and set raw Windows ACLs via an xattr. + a

On 25/09/2020 10:14, Aur?lien Aptel via samba wrote: > Ken Bass via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> Can you please expand on this, I am confused as to what you are >> suggesting.? If 'getent pass' works properly and shows no >> overlap/confusion, this seems to be related to cifsacl. > It's still hard to say at this point. > > cifs.idmap

On 9/24/20 12:10 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/09/2020 16:58, Ken Bass via samba wrote: >> On 9/24/20 11:51 AM, Aur?lien Aptel wrote: >>> The request-keys config looks right. >>> >>> You can check if winbind is properly configured trying to map with the >>> winbind CLI client called wbinfo. For example: >>> >>> # wbinfo -i

On 9/24/20 11:51 AM, Aur?lien Aptel wrote: > The request-keys config looks right. > > You can check if winbind is properly configured trying to map with the > winbind CLI client called wbinfo. For example: > > # wbinfo -i NUC\\administrator > NUC\administrator:*:20501:20514::/home/NUC/administrator:/bin/bash > ^^^^^ ^^^^^ > uid

On 9/25/20 5:14 AM, Aur?lien Aptel wrote: > Ken Bass via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> Can you please expand on this, I am confused as to what you are >> suggesting.? If 'getent pass' works properly and shows no >> overlap/confusion, this seems to be related to cifsacl. > It's still hard to say at this point. > > cifs.idmap logs