similar to: samba 4 ad member - idmap = ad for machine accounts

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "samba 4 ad member - idmap = ad for machine accounts"

2017 Sep 19
2
samba 4 ad member - idmap = ad for machine accounts
Hai Marco, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 september 2017 12:40 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba 4 ad member - idmap = ad for > machine accounts > > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... >
2019 Aug 28
4
[OT?] W10, SYSTEM, guest access.
[ I've just asked abut that, here, but now seems a simpler things, so i retry... ] This seems NON a samba touble, but a different behaviour in M$ client OS. But, really, i've not clue how to find an answer... Suppose to have a Win7 and a Win10 machine, both NOT joined to a domain. Suppose to have a share, with guest access enabled, where only readonly access are needed. Suppose also
2019 Sep 19
3
Script to sync xID/idmap.ldb, some questions...
I'm scripting the ''replica'' of DC xID db (idmap.ldb) between DCs, following: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Built-in_User_.26_Group_ID_Mappings but i've two question. 1) because i've just in place the sysvol replica, i've thinked of copying the 'idmap.ldb.bak' file on sysvol share (in debian,
2017 Sep 19
3
ODP: Re: samba 4 ad member - idmap = ad for machine accounts
Basically that was my initial question, should adding GID and UID to domain computers group (gid) and machine accounts (uid) be enough, and if it should, and it doesnt work - what else should be done to make it work, or what am I missong? I'm not sure what You mean about invalidating cache? Wysłano z mojego smartfona w PLAY <div>-------- Oryginalna wiadomość
2018 Jan 15
5
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:55:55 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > It is not the SYSTEM user (that is a local user to the > > > workstation, so clearly does not exist on the domain). > > Yes it does. Look at "Builtin\system" which is also "NT
2018 Oct 09
2
Samba and Freeradius...
Hello, Wiki entry was based on my mail to this list, sorry if I was not clear enough. I'm glad You figured it out yourself, Regards, Kacper W dniu 09.10.2018 o 17:21, Marco Gaiarin via samba pisze: >> Someone have some hints? Thanks. > ...i reply to myself. > > Indeed the option 'ntlm auth = mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only' (4.7+) or 'ntlm auth = > yes'
2017 Dec 14
5
[Curiosity] 'netbios aliases' works in AD mode?
Ahem no one reply me. A little fast-rewind: i need to have some 'aliases' to my servers (DM); seems i need to add in smb.conf: netbios aliases = FILESV but also add a 'SPN'; trying to look around for an examples, lead me to ''nothing'', or to examples that seems to me unrelated. Supposing the domain is 'ad.fvg.lnf.it' and the FQDN of the real host is
2018 Jan 15
3
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I am not disputing what you say, I am just asking for concrete proof > that a computer account MUST have a uidNumber account. Rowland, it is not (only) a matter of authentication, it is a matter of 'act' with machine account. I've digged a bit but found nothing than (i use WPKG as deployment system, it is only an
2018 Oct 09
2
Samba and Freeradius...
I'm trying to move my freeradius server from debian jessie (freeradius 2.2.5+dfsg-0.2+deb8u1 and samba 4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u9) in a NT like domain to a new stretch server (freeradius 3.0.12+dfsg-5+deb9u1 and samba 4.8.5+mnu-1~deb9, louis packages). Many things changed. I've followed (also): https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Freeradius_against_Active_Directory and added in
2018 Jul 20
4
Samba 4.5 and glusterfs...
Reding the thread in list about gluster, i've found that in your samba packages 4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u2~bpo8+1 there's no vfs_glusterfs module, only the manpage. root at vdmsv1:~# grep glusterfs /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba-vfs-modules.list:/usr/share/man/man8/vfs_glusterfs.8.gz root at vdmsv1:~# grep /vfs/ /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba*.list
2020 Aug 26
4
Win10 and NT mode: netlogon script seems does not run anymore.
[ Rowland, i know, i need to upgrade. ;-) ] Some month ago, with a relative big bunch of fix&tweaks, i was able to put a Win10 1903 client in join to a 'NT mode' Samba domain. Now i'm trying to do the same with a 1909 version; all seems to work as before, BUT netlogon script (defined in smb.conf with: logon script = startup.bat ) simply seems does not run. No log event in
2019 Jan 09
3
[Oddity] SAMAccountName and 20+ chars logins...
Reading here i've understod that for LDAP query it is better to use SAMAccountName as 'login', but today i've found: https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/windows/desktop/ADSchema/a-samaccountname so, 'SAMAccountName' is a compatibility field with NT mode, limited to 20 chars. Someone here use 21 chars logins? ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
2019 Oct 16
4
vfs_recycle permission bug?!
Samba 4.8 (Louis debian repo), DM. Today i've had to recovery a deleted file in that share, that use 'vfs_recycle' modules: [Work] comment = Spazio di Lavoro Utente map acl inherit = Yes path = /srv/work read only = No store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle full_audit volume = Work full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread
2019 Oct 01
5
Upgrade DC 4.5 -> 4.8, timings?
I've read all docs on upgrades, from wiki to Louis notes, and i think i'm ready to upgrade. First step, move from stretch to jessie, and from 4.5 to 4.8, upgrade in place. But having a domain with 6 DCs, i'm a bit scared to upgrade all DC in one turn, and i'm think about something like: a) upgrade DC with FSMO roles, then wait 1-2 day to spot troubles b) then upgrade all DC in
2017 Dec 18
3
DM and ''offline'' PAM (and NSS?)...
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:51:47 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I've seen: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/PAM_Offline_Authentication > > I've tried to enable offline logon, and seems to work as expected. > > I've only found a little strange thing, i think related to the fact > that in my DM i've set
2018 May 14
2
Samba, AD and devices compatibility...
Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I hope this clarifies things, Super-clear! Thanks! -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t
2018 Sep 04
4
Upgraded a member server to 4.8, rfc2307 data?
I'm starting to upgrade my domain members to debian stretch/samba 4.8, using louis packages. Domain controllers still on jessie/samba45. Upgrade went smooth, but after upgrade seems that the DM was not able anymore to retrieve rfc2307 data, eg: root at vdmsv2:~# getent passwd gaio gaio:*:10000:10513:Marco Gaiarin:/home/LNFFVG/gaio:/bin/false root at vdmsv2:~# ldbsearch -H
2018 Nov 26
3
Different LDAP query in different DC...
I need to do a simple query, against some LDAP data in 'laster draft schema' format i've added to te samba/AD schema. All LDAP query return the same result on all (6) of the DC: root at vdcsv1:~# ldapsearch -H ldap://vdcsv2.ad.fvg.lnf.it -W -D CN=mta,OU=Restricted,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it -b DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it "(cn=prova123)" rfc822MailMember Enter LDAP Password:
2019 Dec 10
2
DC in trash...
Debian stretch, louis packages 4.9.16+dfsg-0.1~stretch~1 . After some time (roughly: two weeks) my DC with FSMO roles (seems that other DC are unaffected) goes suddenly on trash: memory jump from 50% (3GB) to 100%, container start to swap and slow down (load 10-15) al the phisical server. A simple restart solve all the troubles. Some hint on how to debug that? Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin
2019 Jan 25
3
Removing sites and DC...
I need to close a site. No, no people fired, i've defined sites and DC because i hope that get (re)opened, but... There's some care i need to have to remove a DC (clearly, without FSMO roles)? I've looked on wiki to 'remove a DC' but i was not able to find something... Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra