similar to: samba 4 ad member - idmap = ad for machine accounts

Hey, In samba 4.5.0 update notes it states: /NTLMv1 authentication disabled by default ----------------------------------------- In order to improve security we have changed the default value for the "ntlm auth" option from "yes" to "no". This may have impact on very old clients which doesn't support NTLMv2 yet. The primary user of NTLMv1 is MSCHAPv2 for

Hello, I understand the OP, I was asking some time ago similar question, but it was in relation to samba domain member. I couldn't get backend: ad to work for machine accounts, so i switched to idmap: rid and it solved everything. I tried manually adding UID and GID to Domain Computer group and to machine accounts, but it didn't seem to work properly, so I gave up especially that RID

Hi, you're right about kvno. kvno dc gives me: dc at DOMAIN.NET.PL: kvno = 1 I'm pretty sure I didn't change dc$ password nor keytab wasn't recreated (the file is from 2015). I've checked other DCs. It looks like two of them with CentOS 7 have kvno = 2, and one with CentOS 6 has also v 1. DCs on CentOS 7 are pretty new, with samba version 4.7.4 from the scratch. Main DC

As I said, I haven't got time to look at what's really happening, just that sometimes windows 10 + some file = security tab just closes/crashes instantly and clearly there is a long SID that's not like anything I recognize, might be well known SID (not well known enough though I'd say, as it's unresolved ;) ). I'm not sure if my experiences are related to those of OP,

I've noticed myself similiar issue. Windows 10 (v 1803) - window with security tab open crashes on certain files (yes, just the window, not whole OS). Just before crash i see unresolved SID which looks like nothing I know (doesn't look like domain SID - maybe local user SID from samba member server?). All files that cause this issue are from any of the samba servers. Same files I can

what is the output of "kvno dc.domain.net.pl"? There seems to be mismatch kvno of the secrets keytab, and what is client expecting (kvno 2). Kvno increments by 1 for every password change. Was there by any chance password change for the dc$ account and keytab was not recreated? If You made some upgrades, maybe during process You for example rejoined the domain (that would set new

Hi, My guess is this: RSAT reads policy definitions either from central store (first) or from local (if first not found). It might be the case, that one of the policies templates was changed between windows 7 and windows 10 and now windows 7 runs into errors. Your error shows that it's trying to look for policy definition in the local store (c:\windows\PolicyDefinitions). You can google

I made some progress with the issue, but didn't solve it completely It's basically a kind of bug (i'm not sure if it's on kerberos side or samba, I think samba is the culprit here (?). Microsoft uses kind of weird SPN for Hyper-V. Weird as there are "spaces" in the string - which is kind of unique as far as SPN's go, usually SPN form a complete string. So I kind

I've configured samba4 as PDC according to the official HOWTO. Nearly everything went well, except that executing command samba_dnsupdate results with: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Failed nsupdate: 2 Failed update of 21 entries The whole output is available at: http://pastebin.com/xrG2KZwZ It's wired, because domain seems working properly: I can login as domain admin,

Hello, Is it possible to pass user's credentials provided on login time to external script? My goal is to run external script which will mount webdav share by using user's username and password and afterwards share it through samba. -- odwied? nasz? stron? <http://www.artegence.pl/swf/index.html?a=m> Do??cz do nas na Facebooku <http://www.facebook.com/artegence>

Hi, When I try to get some records by ldbsearch i get weird messages before I get what I search, that started to show some time ago. I did not have it before, anyone had that messages? Do I should worry? ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb sAMAccountName=test GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered GENSEC backend

Hello, I do vulnerability test on my infrastructure, and I get report about weak ciphers on samba services, is it possible to set stronger ciphers for samba? On old samba3 that was possible to set "ssl ciphers" in smb.conf, but now I don't see any documentation how to change it. Is it possible, if so, how? -- Arkadiusz Karpi?ski Efinity Sp. z o.o. 02-672 Warszawa, ul.

Peoplefone AG jest firm? oferuj?c? us?ugi telekomunikacyjne oparte na technologii Voice over IP (VoIP) w wyj?tkowo niskich stawkach. Peoplefone jest certyfikowanym partnerem firm Siemens<http://www.siemens.ch/index.jsp?sdc_p=c175fi1012637lmno1012637psuz1&sdc_sid=1113876080&>i AVM/FRITZ!Box <http://www.fritz-shop.ch/>. W zwi?zku z naszym dynamicznym rozwojem, do nowo tworzonej

Hi, I have a problem with GPO editing. I have some GPO first created with RSAT and GPO editor on Win 7 x64. I have modified recently this object with RSAT and GPO editor on Win 10 x64 . If I try to edit the GPO back to Win7 I got the following error (in french): La ressource ? $(string.SiteDiscoveryEnableWMI) ? r?f?renc?e dans l?attribut displayName est introuvable. Fichier

On 29 May 2017 12:32 >When running 'winbindd -SFd5', I see a little more of the problem after I run my two ntlm_auth commands > one after the other. I believe the 'crap' part is an acronym for 'Challenge Response > Authentication Protocol', so why would it be failing? Edit2: wbinfo -a tim.odriscoll%<mypass> works perfectly, with the winbindd debug logs

On 01.10.2019 14:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 01/10/2019 12:51, Arkadiusz Karpi?ski wrote: >> >> On 30.09.2019 20:03, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 30/09/2019 18:06, akarpinski wrote: >>>> Samba version is 4.10.7 >>>> >>>> smb.conf: >>>> >>>> # Global parameters >>>> [global]

By primary group I mean the group that is set by chgrp. that is the group returned after the pound key (#) from getfacl. In other words the Unix group and not the one managed by ACLs. / Kacper > Hello, > > I've seem to have found what looks like a bug in Samba 4.8.3. It's > the same problem as described in > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-March/214589.html.

> I'm trying to understand how the non-LTO case is supposed to work non-LTO case works because when linker starts it’s job all the llvm intrinsics are already lowered. > Right, which is why I am suggesting that it might be appropriate to build with -fno-builtin (or -fno-builtin-exp) here – > this solves the LTO issue as there will no longer be an llvm intrinsic in the bitcode Yes, I

Hello Teresa, > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, That’s correct. > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it wouldn’t be resolved from libexp.a, because of the behavior described in my first message. > Do you also have an implementation of __exp_finite in your libexp.a? No, I don’t

+pcc for thoughts On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Bakhvalov, Denis <denis.bakhvalov at intel.com > wrote: > Hello Teresa, > > > > > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, > > That’s correct. > > > > > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. > > That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it