similar to: remove missing 2nd DC

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "remove missing 2nd DC"

2016 Jan 07
2
Permissions Problem on a share
that was a stupid answer, sorry, i did read it correctly. post your smb.conf (sanitized) so we can have a look what we are talking about. > Op 7 jan. 2016 om 20:56 heeft L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> het volgende geschreven: > > try with an unc path and not a drive letter. > if you get the admin auth you loose the drive letter. > > greetz, > louis >
2006 Oct 05
1
[LLVMdev] Extracting all BasicBlocks of a Function into new Function
Hi, Op 5-okt-06, om 16:05 heeft Ryan Brown het volgende geschreven: > I don't know if that's valid but what about something like this: > int va_double_sum(int count,...){ > /*declare va_list for each original va_start*/ > /*llvm.va_start for each va_list*/ > /*call extracted_sum(count,va_list1, va_list2, ...)*/ > } That should work, I think, ... Op 5-okt-06, om
2016 Jan 07
0
Permissions Problem on a share
Currently away from my desk. Will post smb.conf as soon as I get to ssh terminal. Thanks for your help. On Jan 7, 2016 3:05 PM, "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > that was a stupid answer, sorry, i did read it correctly. > > post your smb.conf (sanitized) so we can have a look what we are talking > about. > > > > Op 7 jan. 2016 om 20:56 heeft
2017 Jul 08
1
Problems with GPO
dont chown, dont run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. just fix the rights from windows and test. if the win event log is ok, then dont touch sysvol again, only setup/change gpo's. if gpos dont work, what is the event id and error message. greetz, Louis ps im sick and only mail available so im bit slow in responce. > Op 8 jul. 2017 om 10:42 heeft Stefan G. Weichinger via samba
2017 Jul 09
1
Problems with GPO
good to hear you made it all work :-) and thanx, its getting better not there yet, few more days the doc says.. some nasty virus did hit me.. takes time and rest...the rest, i dont mind ;-) Greetz Louis > Op 9 jul. 2017 om 11:23 heeft Stefan G. Weichinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> Am 2017-07-08 um 15:20 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via
2006 Aug 20
3
[LLVMdev] Weird behavior of llvm-ld
Hi, Op 20-aug-06, om 21:18 heeft Reid Spencer het volgende geschreven: > I looked over your patch and it looks good. I applied a patch based on > yours. The llvm-ld tool now uses the PluginLoader just like the opt > tool. It will also run some cleanup passes after the loaded plugins > run > to ensure cruft is removed. OK, thanks. Your patch seems to work, although I also get
2006 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] Weird behavior of llvm-ld
Do you have a verify option in your loaded module? Reid. On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:04 +0200, Bram Adams wrote: > Hi, > > Op 20-aug-06, om 21:18 heeft Reid Spencer het volgende geschreven: > > > I looked over your patch and it looks good. I applied a patch based on > > yours. The llvm-ld tool now uses the PluginLoader just like the opt > > tool. It will also run
2024 Feb 15
2
ipv6 with Samba-AD-DC?
Hi Joachim, > Op 15 feb 2024 om 23:09 heeft Joachim Lindenberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > ?Hi Rowland, > No, I don?t have so many devices yet. Rowland believes that one should not use IPv6 internally. Many disagree. > But I know some organizations that want to switch to IPv6 consistently and you can rephrase my question to whether
2006 Sep 25
2
[LLVMdev] Name of Function's original module during link-time optimization
Hi, Op 25-sep-06, om 20:07 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: > What are you trying to accomplish? Why not use location records from > debug info? You mean the debugging intrinsics? Just discovered them :-), and I guess that's exactly what I need. Haven't tried them extensively yet, so I'm wondering whether the remark in your mail of 09/04/2006 to Nikhil Patil
2006 Aug 20
2
[LLVMdev] Weird behavior of llvm-ld
Hi, Op 20-aug-06, om 22:26 heeft Reid Spencer het volgende geschreven: > Do you have a verify option in your loaded module? What exactly do you mean by "verify option"? Anyway, I did a grep on "verify" in my code, but found nothing. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)
2006 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
Hi, Op 15-nov-06, om 03:26 heeft Tanya M. Lattner het volgende geschreven: > I'm able to reproduce this if I skip doing a "make" and directly do a > "make install" after configuring. I believe we require people to do > a full > build before attempting to install. So I don't think its really a bug. > Could you try doing a make first and then install?
2007 May 26
2
[LLVMdev] Linking two external linkage GlobalValues
Hi, Op 26-mei-07, om 23:14 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: > Shouldn't these symbols get "common" linkage, aka llvm weak linkage? > > Are you building the source with -fno-common? Yes. What does this mean? Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)
2007 May 30
2
[LLVMdev] Code generation issues
Hi, Op 30-mei-07, om 06:31 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: >> when I do: llc file.bc -march=c -o file.c > > The C backend doesn't support all target-specific intrinsics. OK (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1481). > Please file a bug with this in a self-contained .c file. Thanks! Has happened: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1482. > Very strange.
2019 Apr 13
1
Something not good.
Do you check the system log of Centos? > Op 12 apr. 2019 om 22:38 heeft Paul Martin <pm at nowster.me.uk> het volgende geschreven: > > Seeing as you're running systemd, you might want to look at the > Journal too: > > journalctl -u icecast2 > > -- > Paul Martin <pm at nowster.me.uk> > _______________________________________________ > Icecast
2019 Dec 10
1
No ssl capability
Thanks chip! Thats working. Thanks a lot Kind regards, Marv Op 10 dec. 2019 om 19:51 heeft Chip <chiapas at aktivix.org> het volgende geschreven: > >  > How about this: > https://serverok.in/centovacast-enable-ssl-on-icecast > You're welcome. Don't mention it :o) > > Chip Scooter > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 12:54, Marvin | OveralWiFi.nu <marvin at
2006 Aug 14
2
[LLVMdev] link time optimization doc
Hi, Op 13-aug-03, om 19:35 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Devang Patel wrote: >> I have installed LinkTimeOptimization.html document in doc >> directory to describe LTO interface. > > Here's a link: :) > http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html Does the LTO-interface function already, or is functionality currently
2017 Oct 16
2
NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR from RPC server on samba 4.5.8 AD DC
yes, this should work fine but this is something in your setup. can you try this kinit Administrator net   ads join -k -s fqdn-dc1.dom.tld if kinit fails, then Rowland wil find your error..   ive seen this few times.. -S  solves it most of the times. Greetz, Louis (mobile) Op 16 okt. 2017 om 18:27 heeft Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende
2015 Dec 23
3
Network configuration issue with second public ip on CentOS 6
> Op 23 dec. 2015 om 18:31 heeft Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> het volgende geschreven: > > >> > > If I understand IP networking correctly, you only can have "aliases" of > the interface appear on the _same_ network segment (I'm tempted to say > same class C network) as the main IP of interface, say you have: > > DEVICE=eth0
2017 Oct 16
0
NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR from RPC server on samba 4.5.8 AD DC
Hi, I provided the dump of all the conf files to Rowland by email but in case anyone else is curious they are also here: http://www.irconan.co.uk/dc.tar http://www.irconan.co.uk/member.tar I tried providing -S to the join command which didn't change the behaviour. It doesn't seem to have trouble finding the DC, only when connecting to the RPC server. Cheers, Richard On 16/10/2017
2006 Sep 25
0
[LLVMdev] Name of Function's original module during link-time optimization
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Bram Adams wrote: > Op 25-sep-06, om 20:07 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: >> What are you trying to accomplish? Why not use location records from >> debug info? > > You mean the debugging intrinsics? Just discovered them :-), and I guess > that's exactly what I need. Haven't tried them extensively yet, so I'm >