similar to: Problems with GPO

dont chown, dont run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. just fix the rights from windows and test. if the win event log is ok, then dont touch sysvol again, only setup/change gpo's. if gpos dont work, what is the event id and error message. greetz, Louis ps im sick and only mail available so im bit slow in responce. > Op 8 jul. 2017 om 10:42 heeft Stefan G. Weichinger via samba

On 02/06/2018 03:24 PM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > ok, > > do the following. > set ignore systemacl to yes on sysvol and netlogon. Added "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes" to both shares, restarted the server > > login as dom\administrator > computer manager, connect to dc. > share sysvol, goto share security, reset to defalts. > same for

Hai, Ok, for the sysvol. I'll put all steps here again. I suggest start with this one. wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh This checks and set the rights to be known to be right. ( aka works great for me ) ;-) Then follow these steps. - login as dom\administrator. - start computer manager, connect to dc. - klik Shared Folders, Shares,

On 02/07/2018 05:01 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai, > > Ok, for the sysvol. > I'll put all steps here again. > > I suggest start with this one. > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh > This checks and set the rights to be known to be right. ( aka works great for me ) ;-) > Thanks, but before I run that

now, im on a phone and no browser, so limit help. first thing i see.   CN=Bj”rn <User>,CN=Users,DC=rootrudi,DC=de Bj”rn ?  is your system set to utf8? i dont know, but this does not look right. i see, wifi? yes, try utp. langsame Verbindung:500 kbps and do try the ignore systemacl.  that solves the user/group “nt authority\system” problems the easy way. greetz Louis Op 6 feb. 2018

a quick read and one thing, the dc4, after the upgrade to 4.7, did you reindex the ad database? if im correct, samba-tool dbcheck — reindex i did read that from a list somewere, a responce of andrew. greetz Louis (mobile) Op 23 okt. 2017 om 20:47 heeft mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: Hi, Back in the samba 4.1 days, we experienced a samba database

hai Micha,   The why is explained here. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/The_SYSTEM_Account  Which in the end has todo with SID_BOTH, one sid for a user and group, linux does not understand that correctly.   with : acl_xattr:ignore system acls = [yes|no] When set to yes, a best effort mapping from/to the POSIX ACL layer will not be done by this module. The default is no, which means that Samba

that was a stupid answer, sorry, i did read it correctly. post your smb.conf (sanitized) so we can have a look what we are talking about. > Op 7 jan. 2016 om 20:56 heeft L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> het volgende geschreven: > > try with an unc path and not a drive letter. > if you get the admin auth you loose the drive letter. > > greetz, > louis >

Hi, Op 5-okt-06, om 16:05 heeft Ryan Brown het volgende geschreven: > I don't know if that's valid but what about something like this: > int va_double_sum(int count,...){ > /*declare va_list for each original va_start*/ > /*llvm.va_start for each va_list*/ > /*call extracted_sum(count,va_list1, va_list2, ...)*/ > } That should work, I think, ... Op 5-okt-06, om

Currently away from my desk. Will post smb.conf as soon as I get to ssh terminal. Thanks for your help. On Jan 7, 2016 3:05 PM, "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > that was a stupid answer, sorry, i did read it correctly. > > post your smb.conf (sanitized) so we can have a look what we are talking > about. > > > > Op 7 jan. 2016 om 20:56 heeft

ok, do the following. set ignore systemacl to yes on sysvol and netlogon. login as dom\administrator computer manager, connect to dc. share sysvol, goto share security, reset to defalts. same for folder. goto gpo manager, klik on every gpo object, if one has wrong acl, you get a message to reset it, thats ok. now never samba-tool sysvol reset if you do, you might need to set share/file

Hi, Op 20-aug-06, om 21:18 heeft Reid Spencer het volgende geschreven: > I looked over your patch and it looks good. I applied a patch based on > yours. The llvm-ld tool now uses the PluginLoader just like the opt > tool. It will also run some cleanup passes after the loaded plugins > run > to ensure cruft is removed. OK, thanks. Your patch seems to work, although I also get

Do you have a verify option in your loaded module? Reid. On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:04 +0200, Bram Adams wrote: > Hi, > > Op 20-aug-06, om 21:18 heeft Reid Spencer het volgende geschreven: > > > I looked over your patch and it looks good. I applied a patch based on > > yours. The llvm-ld tool now uses the PluginLoader just like the opt > > tool. It will also run

to fix this, try the following remove the content in the sysvol folder (move it away) run samba-tool with sysvol reset copy the content back with now setfacl copy the acl recursive to the 'domain folder' in vol back. now on a windows open group policy editor klik on the gp objects. if needed , it say i needs some right fix. when this is done dont sysvol reset anymore. this is a

Hi, Op 25-sep-06, om 20:07 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: > What are you trying to accomplish? Why not use location records from > debug info? You mean the debugging intrinsics? Just discovered them :-), and I guess that's exactly what I need. Haven't tried them extensively yet, so I'm wondering whether the remark in your mail of 09/04/2006 to Nikhil Patil

Hi, Op 20-aug-06, om 22:26 heeft Reid Spencer het volgende geschreven: > Do you have a verify option in your loaded module? What exactly do you mean by "verify option"? Anyway, I did a grep on "verify" in my code, but found nothing. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

Hi, Op 15-nov-06, om 03:26 heeft Tanya M. Lattner het volgende geschreven: > I'm able to reproduce this if I skip doing a "make" and directly do a > "make install" after configuring. I believe we require people to do > a full > build before attempting to install. So I don't think its really a bug. > Could you try doing a make first and then install?

Hi, Op 26-mei-07, om 23:14 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: > Shouldn't these symbols get "common" linkage, aka llvm weak linkage? > > Are you building the source with -fno-common? Yes. What does this mean? Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

Hi, Op 30-mei-07, om 06:31 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: >> when I do: llc file.bc -march=c -o file.c > > The C backend doesn't support all target-specific intrinsics. OK (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1481). > Please file a bug with this in a self-contained .c file. Thanks! Has happened: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1482. > Very strange.

Do you check the system log of Centos? > Op 12 apr. 2019 om 22:38 heeft Paul Martin <pm at nowster.me.uk> het volgende geschreven: > > Seeing as you're running systemd, you might want to look at the > Journal too: > > journalctl -u icecast2 > > -- > Paul Martin <pm at nowster.me.uk> > _______________________________________________ > Icecast