similar to: Lowercase characters on GPO IDs in Samba source files

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Lowercase characters on GPO IDs in Samba source files"

2017 Jun 28
0
Lowercase characters on GPO IDs in Samba source files
In April 2016 I reported the following typos in three source files related to sysvol and GPOs. ./examples/misc/adssearch.pl:357:"Default Domain Controllers Policy" => "6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9" ./libgpo/gpo_util.c:46: "6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9" } ./python/samba/provision/__init__.py:123:DEFAULT_DC_POLICY_GUID =
2017 Jun 28
0
Lowercase characters on GPO IDs in Samba source files
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 21:44:05 +0100 Miguel Medalha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Turns out that I was at least half-right, after all. > > I just opened the files contained in the last Samba release > (contained in samba-4.6.5.tar.gz) and although the typos have been > corrected in "./python/samba/provision/__init__.py", *they are still > there* in
2017 Jun 28
2
Lowercase characters on GPO IDs in Samba source files
Turns out that I was at least half-right, after all. I just opened the files contained in the last Samba release (contained in samba-4.6.5.tar.gz) and although the typos have been corrected in "./python/samba/provision/__init__.py", *they are still there* in "./examples/misc/adssearch.pl" and "./libgpo/gpo_util.c". It happened that, before my first post, I had
2016 Apr 22
3
Samba 4.4.2 "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" is not working correctly
Samba 4.4.2 I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies
2019 May 16
0
GPO-Error
On 16/05/2019 09:00, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, > listing all GPOs is working: > ------------------ > > root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall > GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > display name : Default Domain Policy > path : >
2013 Nov 15
0
gpo not working
Hello people: First, excuse any misspelling, english is not my mother tongue I'm triying a simple gpo, put a fixed image as wallpaper on all the pc connected to the dc but is not working. Using the remote administration tool had has defined an Organizational Unit with one user and defined a policy with two restrictions 1) use a shared image [ \\dc\common\backgroud.jpg ] as wallpaper 2)
2016 Jan 14
0
Cannot add a new GPO opject at GPMC on win7
Hi, guys! Have some trouble with adding a new GPO. If i add a new GPO it says me "The parametr is incorrect" I use RSAT on win7. I have an AD DC based on samba 4.1.14 on FreeBSD 10.1 Evrything else working fine/ Here is my smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DEVCOM realm = DEV.COM.UA netbios name = WIZARD server role = active directory domain controller #server services =
2019 May 16
0
GPO-Error
Hai Stefan, What is the samba version your running now? Im now at 4.10.3 with my DC's and the command : samba-tool gpo list username Then it does show the GPO's for the user. If you on 4.10, check if these are installed : ii python3 3.5.3-1 amd64 interactive high-level object-oriented language (default python3 version) ii
2020 Feb 26
0
sysvolcheck and aclcheck generates error
Hi, Search on the net but not getting enough information to resolve the issue. As per suggestion to check the sysvol but mine got issues. Currently using CentOS 8.1.1911 and a compiled samba 4.11.4 based on Fedora 31. I tried also to delete the broken GPO policy E4108E65-68AB-4E2D-9A00-A9063B1558E3 but I can't delete it (using samba-tool gpo del {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2019 May 16
5
GPO-Error
Hello, I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, listing all GPOs is working: ------------------ root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} display name : Default Domain Policy path : \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} dn :
2019 May 16
1
GPO-Error
Ok, so yesterday it worked. Can you run this for me and mail me the output, i have a quick check. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh And https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-db-repl.sh Last, have you check for corrupted filesystem and/or file/folders? Any updates done last days? Now maybe, just maybe, and this
2015 Apr 24
0
Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: vrijdag 24 april 2015 11:06 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1 > >On 24/04/15 09:52, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Im having a strange thing with
2023 May 11
1
Usage of '--domain-guid' parameter of 'samba-tool domain provision'
Hello, I was hoping to reprovision the same domain by specifying the domain GUID in the command line tool 'samba-tool domain provision' but I am not sure if I missed something or if there is a bug but the specified domain GUID is not the one which is created for my domain. Specifying the domain SID seems to work as I would expect. I tested it with Samba shipped by Debian 11 (samba2
2015 May 01
0
After the classicupgrade from samba3 to sernet-samba-4.2.1 , users are not able to remote desktop anymore
correct. bug still exists, just tested also on latest git master. see : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11061 temp solution. try adding : auth methods = sam, winbind to smb.conf on the dc and restart the DC. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: mariopiorusso at ie.ibm.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mario Pio Russo
2015 Oct 06
0
gpo failure
Hello Mourik, Am 06.10.2015 um 17:41 schrieb mourik jan c heupink: > So does this mean this GPO is a corrupt one..? Looking it up in the > windows Group Policy Management, it seems the policy in question is > the Default Domain Policy. The two GUID directories, that exist on every AD DC, are {6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} = Default Domain Controller Policy
2015 Oct 06
3
gpo failure
Hi Marc, Ok, I apologise, I was unsure if the number {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} was something sensitive password-like or not, so i changed it slightly.... Sorry..! The number is actually the number as you quote it below for the Default Domain Policy. > The two GUID directories, that exist on every AD DC, are > > {6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} = Default Domain
2019 Sep 30
0
Compile samba github code and flash the build binary to embedded device
Hi Rowland, Yes, the files I want should be in that folder : /usr/local/samba It is 186 kB, a very huge files. *Which is the compulsory files need for file sharing?* *Which files or sub-folder can I ignore?* Thank you. ubuntu at ubuntu-AngHL:/usr/local$ sudo du samba/ > [sudo] password for ubuntu: > Sorry, try again. > [sudo] password for ubuntu: > 56 samba/lib/security > 284
2016 Jul 24
0
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hi, That's look more like a gpupdate output than an event log entry :-) Le 24/07/2016 à 20:46, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Hello Sébastien Le Ray, > > The PC reply the following... > > The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user > name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: > a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain
2019 Oct 02
0
Compile samba github code and flash the build binary to embedded device
Hi Rowland and All, Can you answer 2 question below? 1. Does the host still able to share file to Windows, IOS and Android devices? 2. Does 74 kB of samba files is the typical file size be implemented in embedded device? On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 14:37, Hock Leong Ang <anghockleong501 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > The above files are built with AD DC. > Without AD DC, the
2015 Nov 13
2
[SOLVED] Re: Problem switching to BIND9_DLZ
On 13/11/15 07:00, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 13.11.2015 um 07:11 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> Hi, >> >> I try to switch from internal DNS to bind9 on an samba-ad-dc (sernet >> 4.1.23 on debian wheezy). >> I try to run >> >> samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ >> >> and get an python error pointing to >>