similar to: Samba 4.3.x - only AUTH with AD (no Domain Join of Samba) ?

Hello Volker, if I understand right, that is not possible. The Samba Server has to be Join to the Domain and then it will work !? Thanks >-----Original Message----- >From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de] >Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 7:57 AM >To: Schneck, Dennis <Dennis.Schneck at schulergroup.com> >Cc: samba at lists.samba.org >Subject: Re:

This was a test on debian Jessie with sernet samba 4.2.3. and the test was, "login" with a AD user on ssh. this worked, fine, but this i noticed later. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE] >Verzonden: woensdag 26 augustus 2015 20:39 >Aan: L.P.H. van Belle >CC: samba at lists.samba.org

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:03:21AM +0300, Владимир Терентьев wrote: > Hi. Try add this to your config in global section. > > socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=262140 > SO_SNDBUF=262140 Sorry to step in, but SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF are almost always bad for performance, unless you know *EXACTLY* what you're doing at a packet level. A general

Hi Volker, Reaching to RedHat is not the option for me right now, could you please tell me are there any configuration parameters in smb.conf which will avoid issuing NULL or Anonymous connections or sessions. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de > wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:12:07PM +0530, Shashi Kanth Boddula via samba > wrote:

Hi all, I have a debian jessie server with sernet samba 4.2.8 installed. The problem is when I try to delete a folder with content at the same time that a client is selecting the same folder. In the first client give the error because of the file is in use(the folder) but deletes all the content and in a second time with the folder empty I can delete the folder fine. I have other problem but I

Hi Everyone, I have Samba server 3.5.10 running on RHEL 5.8 platform and it has joined to our AD domain controller. Recently my Windows guys has done some changes to AD Security by stating " CIFS Null Session Vulnerability Fix via GPO - Security Requirement". After this change, my windows clients are not authenticating with domain credentials while accessing the shares, but nothing has

2016-06-02 8:48 GMT+02:00 Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de>: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:44:26PM +0000, Seth Goldin wrote: > > I disabled client signing from the client side, via OS X's global > nsmb.conf > > file: https://discussions.apple.com/message/30282470#30282470 > > > > The performance was back to over 600 MB/s, as compared to 60 MB/s

Hello, > As far as I understood you are using ldapsam only when Samba is running as > AD domain controller. it is only a standalone server, no sid/gid (mapping) needed. All users and groups are local (passwd/groups) maintained. We only want to authenticate the users against the ldap server (openDJ). No Active Directory is used. But if I configure, there are a lot (to much) ldap

The directory is small, it contains only one file. stat() takes 15ms and if I read 1000 files it sums to 15 seconds. So the issue is really that open file is synchronous. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:44:57PM +0200, Peter Bulin wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to to open existing readonly files. Yes you are

3.4.3 ________________________________________ From: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:51 PM To: Rob Lee Cc: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba on AIX - Active directory On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:32:51PM +0000, Rob Lee wrote: > I have many AIX clients running samba from pware. I want to move to > either the version on the

Hi everyone I have a four node samba/CTDB cluster exporting CIFS shares from a GPFS 3.5 cluster. Samba/CTDB is at 4.2.3: [root at hostname ~]# rpm -qa | grep sernet sernet-samba-ad-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-libs-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-common-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-ctdb-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-client-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64

I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled the latest Samba 4.3 tarball and enabled fruit per the modules man page, however directory listing performance still takes a few seconds. I've cranked the fruit debug level up to 10 and can see that it is getting used ("fruit_stat called for

Good afternoon, I have many AIX clients running samba from pware. I want to move to either the version on the AIX expansion pack or the rpm's IBM suggests we download, https://www-01.ibm.com/marketing/iwm/iwm/web/reg/pick.do?source=aixbp&lang=en_US The problem is that the samba version from pware that is working is old and I don't see the pware downloads anymore to upgrade to a

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:09:05PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote: > Hi Volker, > > Yes this problem happens when we have "kernel oplocks = no". This happened > constantly in one of production systems & so we disabled level2-oplock > /set kernel-oplocks=yes (to avoid this issue). So unfortunately don’t have > an environment where it reproduces now & cannot capture

Hi all, I've been looking for an answer for this issue but Google didn't help. So I resource to the next best thing: the Samba mailing list. Question: Is there a way to automaticaly, after a certain amount of time, unlock a file after, for example, a client crash or network problem? I know how to do it manually of course, but that is, well, cumbersome. I've looked at

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:21:50PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote: > Hi Volker, > > Thanks for your reply. When the problem was happening(before we turned off > level2-oplocks), we had captured one run with smbd debug all:10 > (unfortunately we didn’t setup for other modules like vfs etc). Can you > please see if this below trace helps? Thanks. Can you please send the whole

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:20:54AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:05:33 +0100, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de>: > > iirc you need fruit:encoding = native > > Solved. Thanks! > I'm looking forward to netatalk 3.1.8. > > $ getfattr Mew.txt > # file: Mew.txt > user.com.apple.TextEncoding > user.com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment > >

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:57:20AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote: > I would stress, test the upgrade first and have a way back readily > available, because there are many users here that report basic domain > functionality broken for the newly patched versions of Samba... ... if run without winbind, which has been deprecated for a while. Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b,

On 2018-01-12 at 16:24 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba sent off: > > Clearly, also 'Domain Computers' group have to get assigned an GID, > > right? > > Yes. > > The question is, do you need to do this ? Will a computer own anything > on a Unix machine ? it's not the question if he owns anything. It's enough that the machine uses the machine account

Hi, please note that the slides and recordings of this year's sambaXP User and Developer Conference talks are available here: https://sambaxp.org/ Cheers, Karolin -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de Meet us at Storage Developer