Hi Jeremy, Thank you for the reply. I understood. Regards, Shivappa> On 26-Apr-2016, at 12:01 am, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:25:44AM +0530, Shivappa wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> When I back ported vulnerability patch to existing samba4.1.21, I'm facing many fileshare access functionality breaks. >> (All issues are with DCE-RPC calls failures. Even though I have applied DCE-RPC patch) >> >> I see vulnerability patches have been provided for 3.6.x, 4.0, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 but I don't see 4.1 patch for this. >> >> Many functions difference are there between 4.0, (4.1) , 4.2. >> >> Is there any issue for samba-4.1 for patch availability ? >> >> Hope I get some replies. > > Sorry Shivappa, the best solution is to upgrade your > product to at least 4.2. > > The 4.0 and earlier patches were done by Red Hat and > SuSE who both have to support these versions. > > The regular Samba Team don't have the resources to > support that many versions in perpetuity. > > Regards, > > Jeremy.
Mgr. Peter Tuharsky
2016-Apr-27 08:57 UTC
[Samba] [samba] Vulnerability patch issue for 4.1.x
I would stress, test the upgrade first and have a way back readily available, because there are many users here that report basic domain functionality broken for the newly patched versions of Samba... Dňa 27.04.2016 o 09:42 Shivappa napísal(a):> Hi Jeremy, > > Thank you for the reply. > > I understood. > > > Regards, > Shivappa > > > >> On 26-Apr-2016, at 12:01 am, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:25:44AM +0530, Shivappa wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> When I back ported vulnerability patch to existing samba4.1.21, I'm facing many fileshare access functionality breaks. >>> (All issues are with DCE-RPC calls failures. Even though I have applied DCE-RPC patch) >>> >>> I see vulnerability patches have been provided for 3.6.x, 4.0, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 but I don't see 4.1 patch for this. >>> >>> Many functions difference are there between 4.0, (4.1) , 4.2. >>> >>> Is there any issue for samba-4.1 for patch availability ? >>> >>> Hope I get some replies. >> Sorry Shivappa, the best solution is to upgrade your >> product to at least 4.2. >> >> The 4.0 and earlier patches were done by Red Hat and >> SuSE who both have to support these versions. >> >> The regular Samba Team don't have the resources to >> support that many versions in perpetuity. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jeremy.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:57:20AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:> I would stress, test the upgrade first and have a way back readily > available, because there are many users here that report basic domain > functionality broken for the newly patched versions of Samba...... if run without winbind, which has been deprecated for a while. Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
Maybe Matching Threads
- Vulnerability patch issue for 4.1.x
- Vulnerability patch issue for 4.1.x
- [PATCH] Re: Samba 4.1.17 classic update w/LDAP - parsing error
- Fileserver upgraded from 4.1.17 to 4.2 dosen't authenticate users
- Fileserver upgraded from 4.1.17 to 4.2 dosen't authenticate users