similar to: 2016 Server

I will give it a try on weekend and let you know.. Thanks a lot Frank Am 10.11.2016 um 17:03 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:55:03 +0100 > "Rauer, Frank via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi Rowland, >> >> I followed this page >>

Hi Rowland, I followed this page "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record" more than once. Everything in here is fine...every test successful. My problem is that the existing SAO record is pointing to dc1.samdom.example.com which doesn´t exist anymore. Now it must be dc01.samdom.example.com. What happens when I try to add ... samba-tool dns add

Hello list..:-) i have a little problem and don´t find a solution for it. Some time ago our first DC died and I replaced it with a new one with a different name but the same IP.didn´t want to change the DNS entry in all the clients. Guess since than the dynamic DNS update wasn´t working anymore, so I tried to find out the reason. What I found is that the SOA record was pointing still to the

PIZZACODE SECURITY ALERT program: rssh risk: low[*] problem: string format vulnerability in log.c details: rssh is a restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp. For example, if you have a server which you only want to allow users to copy files off of via scp, without providing shell access, you can use rssh to do that. Additioanlly, running rsync, rdist, and cvs are

Hi, Reading samba wiki I'm trying to know if Windows 2019 is supported as member, Latest version on wiki seems is 2016 https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Client_or_Server_to_a_Domain Server (all editions): Windows Server 2016 Windows Server 2012 and 2012R2 Windows Server 2008 and 2008R2 Windows Server 2003 and 2003R2 Windows Server 2000 Windows 2019 is supported? Thanks

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 21:44, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > That's what I said. The cmake based build system needs it. LIT is > optional. It is entirely feasible to have a custom build system and no > Python at all. It would be quite painful to break that. To be explicit (and correct me if I misstate facts), NetBSD wants to build Clang

Hello, looking into the issue described in the advisory below I wonder how to tackle this issues. Primarily I ask myself * is there any reason not to filter all physical memory access by default * what would be the appropriate way to change the filter set? a sysctl? Regards Maximillian Dornseif FireWire/IEEE 1394 direct memory access - CAN-2004-1038 Advisory URL:

Hi, Is it possible to join a Windows 2016 or 2019 server as a member server to a Samba 4.10.6 based AD DC? I apologize if this question has been answered before. Thanks, Peter Rindfuss

There is a cluster of machines which I have an account on which was recently compromised. the machines have thousands of users and the only access is via ssh. via some mechanism (probably a weak password) the attacker was able to compromise a single account and use a local-root exploit to hijack lots of ssh-agents and any unpassword protected keys. they next tried to repeat the process for every

Hi Samba List! Used samba3 for years, now it's time for samba4 (thanks!!!) Unfortunately I am not familiar with certain microsoft concepts about AD and the roles of domain controllers. I've got three vm's for my experiments: 1) a samba4 domain controller test1.test.local 2) a samba4 additional domain controller test2 joined to my domain test.local. 3) a win7 workstation that is

Hello! I'd just like to run this by some people who are more familiar with the RSA and DSA algorithms and their use within (Open)SSH. I've been using OpenSSH happily with the assumption that using key-based authentication (RSA or DSA public keys pushed to .ssh/authorized_keys on remote hosts) provides a number of benefits, including an important security-related one -- Logging in to a

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 12/17/18 2:57 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kaushal Shriyan >> <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected >>> with malware? Currently i am referring to >>>

On Jan 24, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Brent Walker wrote: > Can you explain please why it works for this version of the function: > > double f(double *__restrict__ x, double *__restrict__ y, double > *__restrict__ z); > > What is different here? There are stores here as well. LLVM ignores restrict everywhere except function parameters. This is a compromise aimed at a sweet spot in

Thank you for your reply. The compromise you describe below, is it a compromise in the LLVM back end or in clang? I run into this while building a compiler for a small DSL language for which I generate functions that receive a context from which they extract a bunch of pointers to doubles from which inputs are passed to the function (I just used C/clang in my examples to illustrate the problem).

Are there any plans on the table to add native support for two-factor authentication, such as password *and* public key? Visa PCI standards require two-factor authentication for remote access and if password+key was available in openssh it would be much easier to maintain and support than a full-blown vpn with all the cross-platform compatibility issues that come with one. Thanks! Jacob

On Sun, 4 Oct 2020, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 19:44 +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > > Otherwise, feel free to ask me anything. > > Was it ever considered that the feature itself could be problematic, > security-wise? Of course we considered this. > I see at least two candidates: > - It's IMO generally a bad idea to distribute

Hi, I am trying to build a rock solid XEN High availability cluster. The platform is SLES 11 SP1 running on 2 HP DL585 both connected through HBA fiber channel to the SAN (HP EVA). XEN is running smoothly and I''m even amazed with the live migration performances (this is the first time I have the chance to try it in such a nice environment). XEN apart the SLES heartbeat cluster is

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >> >> Yes, /etc/shadow would have always been readable only by root by >> default. The interesting question here is whether an intruder did >> it, clumsily leaving evidence behind, or whether it is just a local >> change from following some bad advice about things that

currently, in order to join a win XP machine to a samba PDC, you have to use the root account (although you can use an smbpasswd and not the linux password). is there any way to set up another account to do this one particular task (one without uid=0)?. if we have users in remote places, i do not want to have to go over to their work station just to log them on the the domain. alsoi don't

Hello everyone, I am trying to write a wrapper around rsync to do some automated file sync-ing between two servers. I am using ssh as the tranport. How can I avoid the password prompt for ssh? I think I can configure ssh to not require passwords, but this would expose the obvious security risk.What are other users doing to get by this? Is there some tricks I can do in scripting that would allow