similar to: Problem sysvolreset

Hi Rowland. But, samba automaticaly do this mapping. root at server:/usr/local/src/samba-4.4.10# id 'domain admins' uid=3000008(DOMAIN\domain admins) gid=3000008(DOMAIN\domain admins) groups=3000008(DOMAIN\domain admins) Because of this options in smb.conf: winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes Can i remove this mapping only for domain admin group? Thanks 2017-03-07

I have a samba DC based on Debian Buster running samba 4.12.2 from Louis' repo. A second DC on Raspbian buster is running samba 4.12.0. I have sysvol replication working using rsync/unison as per the WiKi. I wasn't having any issues until I tried to edit a GPO and found that all the acl settings had disappeared. This may have happened when I upgraded the DCs from 4.11.x to 4.12.x

Samba 4.4.2 I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies

On 19/05/2020 17:09, Roy Eastwood via samba wrote: > I have a samba DC based on Debian Buster running samba 4.12.2 from Louis' repo. A second DC on Raspbian buster is running samba > 4.12.0. I have sysvol replication working using rsync/unison as per the WiKi. I wasn't having any issues until I tried to edit > a GPO and found that all the acl settings had disappeared. This

> You could try using a script Louis wrote, see here: > https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh > > The 'idmap config' lines are nothing to worry about, you cannot set them on a DC, but, for some reason, testparm etc warns about > them. > > Rowland > Sorry, I should have said - I ran louis' script and set the acl's according

On 25/10/2020 20:37, Sonic wrote: > The reset allowed the current GPO to take effect, but right after > adding a new GPO (just named it, no editing, or linking) the > sysvolcheck fails: > # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception > - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory >

> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version > Version 4.5.8-Debian > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error" > no error > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory

Dear, I'm having trouble handling GPO's my DC. Environment: Samba 4.4.5, primary and secondary DC. I am not allowed to edit the GPO's. The problem occurred after I edit the Default GPO in the primary DC, and then run the rsync to synchronize between the DC's. The following errors arise when squeegee commands: Note: I hid the actual domain name. # samba-tool gpo aclcheck

On 2017-08-24 12:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:03:42 +0200 > Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version >>> Version 4.5.8-Debian >>> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error" >>> no error >>> root at

Hi! I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet. ERROR(<class

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this > shows that extended acls set, to see these: > > getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes: user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x

Hi all, Some (then all) of our workstations were complaining about incorrect ACLs on GPOs and were unable to read the gpt.ini to apply the GPOs. So I did a sysvolcheck and sure enough I'd lost the ACLs when I moved our sysvol share to a new location on the server (whoops, mea culpa). I ran a sysvolreset which took a long time to return (some 5 minutes, please see my post on slow winbind

Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?

For completeness: The existing GPO: # samba-tool ntacl get --as-sddl \{07AF723D-5FFD-4807-B3C6-DFCE911B922A\}/ O:DAG:DAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) The newly created GPO: # samba-tool ntacl get --as-sddl \{0C0B713E-EE65-4ACE-88AE-25125E2AAE00\}/

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ? > Do you have two domains ? Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just using it to compare. > I am also trying to understand why

Hi everybody. One month ago me migrated from samba 3.6 classic domain to samba4. After solving some minor problems, we have found ourselves with a ACL corruption and we don't know how to deal with this. When accesing to our sysvol shared (for example, \\domain.local\sysvol) from both Samba or Windows clients, we are refused to connect. Domain=[VECTORSF] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.4]

Hi, First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event viewer, but seem that some change are not applied, why and where I can find some information, in samba log anv event viewer any error is reported Also I have tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset After this tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

Hi all, We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the same 4.1.6. Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force tells me: "Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful". Taken from the mailinglist, I

Hi all, I'm afraid I'm back to my old issue of GPO permissions. I have two ADDCs providing an AD Domain (internal.stmaryscollege.co.uk (short-name 'SMC')). Servers are called 'ad-01' and 'tainan'. ad-01 is 'Version 4.0.10' and tainan is 'Version 4.1.0rc4' (the latest version in the package repos of the respective OSs (arch and gentoo)) I have