similar to: gpupdate use wrong url

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "gpupdate use wrong url"

2015 Jun 17
3
samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)
Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?
2017 Feb 07
4
gpupdate use wrong url
There's nothing wrong with that path. If your DNS is working, you should be able to connect to \\foo, which is your AD domain. It will just pick one of your DCs instead of a static one. Alex On 06/02/17 14:36, basti via samba wrote: > > samba-tool gpo listall > showes also wrong path in gpo > > > On 06.02.2017 15:21, basti via samba wrote: >> When I do an gpupdate
2017 Feb 07
1
gpupdate use wrong url
Ok that looks good. Ont to try on the pc your testing. Disable ipv6 ( just remove the checkmark dont remove it. ) from the network adapter. *( optional : http://www.bvanleeuwen.nl/faq/?p=1142 ipv6 admx template. ) I have a setup with this admx, i completely disabled ipv6 in my lan. And as Rowland also is telling.. Dns domain = foo Realm = FOO Workgroup = FOO
2016 Jun 27
6
Rights issue on GPO
Hai, After lots of testing and checking today im must concluded that achim and mathias are right. There are "BUILDIN\" security groups which make some GPOs are going wrong. Also, im getting errors again with sysvolcheck. .. i was in the understanding this was resolved.. but im but off with all info, very buzy at the office atm. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class
2017 Feb 07
0
gpupdate use wrong url
Post you ipconfig /all output of the pc. You primary dns suffix or connection suffix is wrong, at least thats my first guess. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens basti via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2017 12:25 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] gpupdate use wrong url
2015 Jun 17
0
samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: woensdag 17 juni 2015 10:54 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks >error/bugged? ( but it all works ok) > >On 17/06/15 08:15, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >>
2017 Feb 07
2
gpupdate use wrong url
Windows-IP-Konfiguration Hostname . . . . . . . . . . . . : wks-1080 Prim„res DNS-Suffix . . . . . . . : foo Knotentyp . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid IP-Routing aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein WINS-Proxy aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein DNS-Suffixsuchliste . . . . . . . : foo Ethernet-Adapter Ethernet 2: Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix: Beschreibung. . . . . .
2017 May 23
3
classic upgrade, splitting servers
Am 2017-05-23 um 20:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> Can I reset that somehow manually? > > If you are adding GPOs, then yes, by never running sysvolreset. I only did that after sysvolcheck failed! And I still get these problems in the GPO-management. I translate via googling: "A processing error occurred collecting data using this base domain controller." this one ?
2018 Jul 30
4
gpupdate /force not applied
The principle was not made any changes to occur this problem. We infra have dc3 and dc4 ADDC. root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V Version 4.7.7-Debian (van-blle apt) Result of gpupdate /force in a joined computer client: C:\>gpupdate /force > Updating Policy... > User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were > encountered: > The processing of Group Policy
2016 Oct 05
4
Failure gpupdate
Colleagues, I come to seek help to solve this problem. I use Samba 4.4.5. I'm getting errors when running gpupdate / force on local desktops. I get the following error: User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encountered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not apply the registry-based policy settings for the Group Policy object
2016 Jun 25
4
Rights issue on GPO
Am 25.06.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Achim Gottinger: > > > Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 24.06.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 24/06/16 21:35, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>>> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at
2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section
2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The
2015 Jun 12
1
samba 4.1.13 not applying domain policy in windows XP clients
Hello, i configured group policy via RSAT in my samba 4.1.13 implementation the policy applies correctly to my windows 7 clients but not to my windows XP clients. when i run gpupdate /force in windows XP it replies that the policies are apply correctly .... when i run ./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
2020 Oct 28
4
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
Good morning Chris > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sonic [mailto:sonicsmith at gmail.com] > Verzonden: dinsdag 27 oktober 2020 21:07 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO fail and sysvol perm errors > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:01 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >
2016 Aug 03
1
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear Sébastien, Sorry for the delay, Please check on the log below. As for the word "存取被拒。" it should translate to Access Deny... Please help. - <Event xmlns="*http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event <http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event>*"> - <System> <Provider Name="*Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy*"
2016 Aug 03
3
Samba 4.2.14 Group Policy (GPO) sync error
Hello, I think I really need some help on this. Since Samba 4.2.11 upgrade my Windows 10 clients are unable to synchronize group policies. I have asked about this already here <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199226.html>. Now I re-investigate the issue with Windows 10 1607 update and still face the same issue which prevents me from rolling out this configuration in
2017 Aug 24
4
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version > Version 4.5.8-Debian > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error" > no error > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2014 May 13
1
GPO problems on a 4.1.6 AD, classicupgraded, uncaught exception
Hi all, We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the same 4.1.6. Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force tells me: "Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful". Taken from the mailinglist, I
2016 Jun 27
0
Rights issue on GPO
On 27/06/16 13:26, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > > After lots of testing and checking today im must concluded that achim and mathias are right. > There are "BUILDIN\" security groups which make some GPOs are going wrong. > > Also, im getting errors again with sysvolcheck. .. i was in the understanding this was resolved.. but im but off with all info, very buzy