similar to: Unix permissions

Hi. I want to use ACL on my RH-9.0 box (x86), so I got ext3 ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ and tried to apply it to the kernel that ships with RH (2.4.20-8). The patching fails on some vm file so I got a vanila kernel 2.4.20, apply the patch and compile it. This works fine. Also RH-9.0 precompiled Samba 2.2.7 works fine with ACL. I connected to my share with WinXP and do some testing

Hi people, iam testing samba3 on freebsd 5.4, i install samba from ports with no problems, i have this simple smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = FREEBSD server string = Samba Server FreeBSD security = user encrypt passwords = yes [public] comment = %h Shared Public Directory path = /opt/test force directory

[ Received no feedback, i resend it... ] A little strange things, but i'm hitting my head on the wall... I needed to 'enlarge' my main filesystem (XFS backed-up), that contain my main samba share and a brick for a GFS share; i've setup a new volume (for the VM), formatted XFS, move all the file taking care to umount and stop GFS (so, syncing the brick, not the GFS filesystem)

I will probably file a bug about this, but perhaps someone here will have some ideas. We have a problem with files being deleted instead of being saved when making changes in Microsoft Excel. The log shows an error of: 'Lock order violation'. This is with Samba 4.1.6 and happens on both Linux (2.6.25-14.fc9.i686) and Solaris 10. No such problem when running Samba 3.6.22. We have a setup

A little strange things, but i'm hitting my head on the wall... I needed to 'enlarge' my main filesystem (XFS backed-up), that contain my main samba share and a brick for a GFS share; i've setup a new volume (for the VM), formatted XFS, move all the file taking care to umount and stop GFS (so, syncing the brick, not the GFS filesystem) using --acls and -attrs rsync options. All

On 02/02/16 20:13, David Thompson wrote: > Hi all, > > > I have a server that has ACL's enabled on it and the groups are set properly from the domain that are applied on top of it for the shared folders. I am running with Mac OS X 10.10.5 on the client side and am having nothing but issues with getting them to respect the ACL's set on the files. > > > The Server Setup

I've reverted my test box fs back to winbindd and taken sssd out of the mix. I'd love some more help on this as its now faring better in testing than sssd with the macs, however I can set the users to be looked up but I'm having issues with having the names of the groups show up. It seems to be working however its now showing the GIDs as opposed to the group names. For instance

Hi all, I have a server that has ACL's enabled on it and the groups are set properly from the domain that are applied on top of it for the shared folders. I am running with Mac OS X 10.10.5 on the client side and am having nothing but issues with getting them to respect the ACL's set on the files. The Server Setup is as follows: Domain Server: Debian 7.9 with Samba 4.3.4 Member

Hello Gabriel, Am 25.05.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Gabriel Franca: > Good morning List > > On Friday I had to leave so I could no longer continue with our lab. > Weekend and holy all have to rest as much as possible. = D > So I'm back and I will put the smb.conf for analysis. > > # Global parameters > > [global] > > workgroup = CMC > > realm = CMC.CORP >

I'm seeing behavior that I was hoping somebody could explain. I have a share set up that will be a repository for company-wide data. There are three classes of people who can access it, readers, read/writers, and admins. Readers and read/writers are self explanatory, admins have read/write access, and can change the permissions/ownership of files. Read and write access is controlled by

Hello! In samba 3 we used create mask , force create..?? to set file permisions. In samba 4 as I understand those options are? ignored and default acls are used instead. But, is it possible to set? by default different permisions on files and folders?? For example?? on folders rwx, and on files rw-. Because I dont want to give x? permision to file as I think it can be dangerous. Thanks in

Hi all, currently we have troubles with the constellation of Office 2007 / 2010 and samba 3.6.6 on Debian 7.5. I can open a Excel file only one time without a write protection. The File is protected on the second try. I can move and copy the file wihtout any Problems. If I move such a Excel File I can open it again for only one time without a write Protection. I already reseted and checked

Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Solaris 9 Samba 3.4.5 I know this isn't the sort of query that gets much response but I'd be really grateful of any advice people can offer. I'm getting really fed up with Samba as I've never been able to make it work properly. Either I'm missing something basic (probably) or it just doesn't behave in the way I think it should!

I am using zfs on linux to store my file shares on. When I create a new file system, they have the following permissions: [root at server ~]# zfs create tank/testsystem [root at server ~]# ls -Al /tank drwxrwxrwx+ 10 root root 27 Jun 2 20:10 Software drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Jun 3 07:43 testsystem At this point, if I use the rsat and attempt to set ACL, I get permission

Hi all, I'd appreciate any pointers or advise regarding the following issue with files written by M$ Office on Samba 3.0.32 on snv_98 (OpenSolaris) on a ZFS filesystem: samba share: [sharename] read only = No browseable = yes writeable = yes directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0770 delete readonly = Yes acl check permissions =

Hello, further investigating the problem we were able to provoke an issue that might be related to the initial problem and could be reproduced with a higher likelihood. The core of the reproducible problem is, that sometimes a file is being created by an application running on the client, but then cannot be written to. Therefore the application throws permission related errors and documents

Hi, I have samba-3.0.13 on linux machine compiled with these parameters: --prefix=/usr/local/samba-3.0.13 --enable-cups --with-ldap --with-ldapsam --with-acl-support --with-quotas In smb.conf I defined share : [POBOX] comment = ! path = /data/disk1/pobox guest ok = no writable = yes directory mask = 0777 force directory mode = 0000 directory security mask =

Hi All! I have Samba 2.2.6 installed on Solaris 8 SPARC. Samba is authenticating users against LDAP (Netscape Directory Server 4.12) One of my directories has rights as following (using synonyms): d rwx r-x --- owner : growner VOL5 I have another user USER1 whose primary group membership is GROUP1, supplementary groupmembership GROWNER. My Samba config follows: [VOL5] path =

Hi everybody, I have a problem with Samba 3.0.2 using POSIX ACLs for shares. File written from an ACL group/user will get wrong permissions and are unchangeable for other users. First the important informations about the configuration and the setup: a) Base system: Debian 3.0.1 with all updates b) Samba: Self compiled binary within /opt/samba-3.0.2 used the following flags:

I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users. for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users. and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1 and grant read only permissions to user2 and user3 how do i do this? any links or direct tips on that? my suggestion would be something like this, but as you can imagine it didn't work: # The general datapool