similar to: DFS in Production Environment

Centos and redhat repositories are not the same. Also I tried epel already. They may change the names of the related packages so I ll ask to redhat team ASAP. Actually I'm testing it out so I have no hurry. I ll let you know guys mobile! 15 Ara 2016 ÖS 9:49 tarihinde "Vinicius Lehmann via samba" < samba at lists.samba.org> yazdı: > Hi, > > Execute* yum install

Hi, Anyone knows what is this? [root at artemis bin]# ./samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [DOM.CITY10.COM.BR]: Domain [DOM]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [187.85.85.1]: Administrator password: Retype

I had the same problem this week. Resolved commenting on the line "includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/" in /etc/krb5.conf On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Vinicius Lehmann via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone knows what is this? > > [root at artemis bin]# ./samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 > --interactive > Realm

Hi, Well, I joined a new DC on my domain and when run "ldapcmp" it reported errors. I follow Samba wiki to Joining a Samba to an Existing Active Directory. * Comparing [DNSFOREST] context... * Objects to be compared: 18 Comparing: 'CN=Infrastructure,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=dom,DC=city10,DC=com,DC=br' [ldap://artemis]

I'm installed on CentOS 7 and the solution was exclude */etc/krb5.conf* or to comment line* includedir *on* /etc/krb5.conf.* Thank you so much everyone. 2016-12-15 11:47 GMT-02:00 L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org >: > Not totaly correct Rowland. > > > > After install krb5-user, you get a default krb5.conf and if you server is > correctly setup,

Hi, Execute* yum install epel-release* and after install packages missing. I installed samba 4 today on CentOS 7 and in officials reps don't have the packages perl-Test-Base and others. Sorry for my english. I don't write very well. 2016-12-15 16:26 GMT-02:00 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > > Am 15.12.2016 um 19:21 schrieb Dale Renton via samba:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:44:26 -0200 Vinicius Lehmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Well, I joined a new DC on my domain and when run "ldapcmp" it > reported errors. I follow Samba wiki to Joining a Samba to an > Existing Active Directory. > > * Comparing [DNSFOREST] context... > > * Objects to be compared: 18 > >

Am 15.12.2016 um 19:21 schrieb Dale Renton via samba: > For CentOS 7 I install these packages before building Samba 4.5.1 from > source > > # yum install chrony gcc perl python-devel gnutls-devel libacl-devel > openldap-devel bind bind-utils krb5-workstation gpgme-devel python2-gnupg but you need https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL as virtually everybody out there because

Not totaly correct Rowland.   After install krb5-user, you get a default krb5.conf and if you server is correctly setup, ( at least for debian related systems ) The default file works as good as the samba generated version. Im testing with as much defaults as possible, but more imported here is, which OS is used, so that the can be added to the wiki, if the solution is this simple.    

Just a thought if the client machines are still getting a listing in the DNS for the failed machines wouldn't this be a problem? How would the programs know not to use the failed server? Is there a way to temporarily move the failed machines out of dns listings? On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Vinicius Bones Silva via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > No, the question is

Hi samba community. I'm having a problem with the smb_auth authentication method. Everything looks like normal, but everytime I try to use smb_auth it returns ERR. I will show here some commands output to secure that all configuration is correct, and if anyone can help me to investigate what's happend I'll thanks. I'm using: Debian lenny, updated. ii samba 2:3.2.3-1

again, under another subject: sorry, maybe an all too trivial question. But we have power data from J frequency spectra and to have the same range for the data of all our subjects, we just transformed them into % values, pseudo-code: power[i,j]=power[i,j]/sum(power[i,1:J]) of course, now we have a perfect linear relationship in our x design-matrix, since all power-values for each subject sum up

While using the Hodges Lehmann Mean in DescTools (DescTools::HodgesLehmann), I found that it generated incorrect answers (see <https://github.com/AndriSignorell/DescTools/issues/97> https://github.com/AndriSignorell/DescTools/issues/97). The error is driven by the existence of tied values forcing wilcox.test in Base R to switch to an approximate algorithm that returns incorrect results - see

Hi I need to define the following c("one group" = class.weight[2], "other group" = class.weight[1]) #class.weight = c(1,2) but I don't like the hard-coded way and would like to use my.group <- array(c("one group", "other group")) but now c(my.group[1] = class.weight[2], my.group[2] = class.weight[1]) gives an error how can I solve this

Dear R-users How can I get the eigenvalues out of an lda analysis? thanks a lot christoph -- Christoph Lehmann <christoph.lehmann at gmx.ch>

Hi I need to overlay two pixmaps (library (pixmap)). One, a pixmapGrey, is the basis, and on this I need to overlay a pixmapIndexed, BUT: the pixmapIndexed has set only some of its "pixels" to an indexed color, many of its pixels should not cover the basis pixmapGrey pixel, means, for this "in pixmapIndexed not defined pixels" it should be transparent. What would you

Dear R experts I have the follwoing data V1 V2 1 -5.8000000 0 2 -4.8000000 0 3 -2.8666667 0 4 -0.8666667 0 5 -0.7333333 0 6 -1.6666667 0 7 -0.1333333 1 8 1.2000000 1 9 1.3333333 1 and I want to know, whether V1 can predict V2: of course it can, since there is a perfect separation between cases 1..6 and 7..9 How can I test, whether this conclusion (being able to assign an

On 10 November 2016 at 07:51, Vinicius Bones Silva via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > PROBABLY its a problem with your reverse dns resolution. > > From the samba server, if you do a host 172.25.0.12 (change as > appropriate) does it resolve to a hostname in the .example.com domain? If > it don't, samba wont know that it's uspposed to block the access. >

am I right in the assumption, that for calculation of the condition numbers I have to use the correlation matrix of X, and not t(x) %*% x? > e <- eigen(t(x) %*% x) better (x must not have a first column of ones): > e <- eigen(cor(x)) > e$val [1] 6.6653e+07 2.0907e+05 1.0536e+05 1.8040e+04 2.4557e+01 2.0151e+00 > sqrt(e$val[1]/e$val) [1] 1.000 17.855 25.153 60.785 1647.478

Hi Since the 'equal slope' assumption doesn't hold in my data I cannot use a proportional odds model ('Design' library, together with 'Hmisc'). I would like to try therefore a partial proportional odds model Please, could anybody tell me, where to find the code and how to specify such a model ..or any potential alternatives many thanks for your kind help christoph