similar to: Samba Wiki change suggestion

Hi Rowland, Am 26.08.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > OK, I have done what whoever changed the wiki page should have done, I > have created a new wiki page for the osync way and rolled the original > page back to the unison way of doing things. > > I will also discuss the unison page with Louis Van Belle, I believe he > is still using this method and may have

On 2016-08-26 10:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:08:16 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication >> workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON >> when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being

I just setup replication of sysvol between my two DC's using the "Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround" and all went well with two exception. First, it seems that since an upgrade to Openssh version 7.0 that "dsa" key use is disabled by default by the Openssh team. There has been some questions for some time now regarding the security of

Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >

On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:15:22 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-08-26 10:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:08:16 -0500 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication >

On 2016-08-26 11:13, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Am 26.08.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> OK, I have done what whoever changed the wiki page should have done, I >> have created a new wiki page for the osync way and rolled the original >> page back to the unison way of doing things. >> >> I will also discuss

I agree, If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it would be easy... However, it seem that they have something else running under samba/nfs to control the permission on the files/folder... I would like to use bidir sync because I like some of the synology feature on remote sync and etc which is making remote access much easier compare to samba... But these sync

On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:08:16 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication > workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON > when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being used for this > replication anymore. As the instructions there actually use

On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:40:36 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I just setup replication of sysvol between my two DC's using the > "Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround" and > all went well with two exception. > > First, it seems that since an upgrade to Openssh version 7.0 that >

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in

Hi Igor, Am 26.08.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Igor & Sandra: > I am part of a group of studies and learning samba 4. > The greatest difficulty is the language, many do not know English. > We set up a team to translate the documentation Samba 4 for our > language. > We would like to take the translation into Portuguese and make it > official. As said in my previous mail: Our

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

I have setup 'profiles' and 'home share' per the instructions on Samba wiki. That seemed to go fine. When I moved on to 'folder re-direction' I tried to open GPO management on my W7 client and received a "User policy could not be updated successfully . . ." on the windows CP console. Started googling the error and ran into "samba-tool ntacl

Hello Min Wai Chan, ? Can you explain more about,, the DC1 will remove any emptey directory on DC1. tested it here, but that does not occure here. i can create empty directories on DC1, and these are synced to DC2. empty or not. ? ?DC1 will overwrite any users/group change on DC2? if setup correctly, your sysvol rights on DC1 and DC2 are the same.. ? i suggest you to the following. get the

Rowland, I think you have confused my email with a different thread. Uhm . . what? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-29 07:30, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/01/15 12:54, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > Rowland, I have tried your various alteration

I am building a 64bit machine for a DC (CentOS 7) following the instructions on the Samba wiki. Installed Samba 4.3.1.tar.gz and when I try to provision the domain I get: ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - operations error at ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c:2241 Search the string and it is bug 11573 (assigned to Andrew.) I realize that he will work on it when he gets time

At one point, I thought the same. Tried a "sleep 5" and still got some failures. (That was before I started counting the fails.) This is a P4 3.2Ghz with 1Gb RAM. Could it be that sluggish (at that moment) and need a "sleep 10" or "sleep 15" or more? It worked on my VM (of course it is running on a multi-core Xeon processor so maybe a sleep?) I'm going to try

Rowland, I have tried your various alteration suggestions and it is a "negative" result. Here is the output from wbinfo -u & wbinfo -g root at dtmbr01:~# wbinfo -u administrator dns-dtdc02 dns-dtdc01 krbtgt guest root at dtmbr01:~# wbinfo -g allowed rodc password replication group enterprise read-only domain controllers denied rodc password replication group read-only domain