similar to: cifs fix and smb3 protocol status.

The SMB3 POSIX extensions is different from the old Unix extensions. The Unix extensions can only support vers=1.0, but the new SMB3 POSIX extensions can support SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1. You can check this 2018 presentation slides: https://www.snia.org/sites/default/files/SDC/2018/presentations/SMB/Steve_French_SMB311.pdf Page 12 shows that POSIX extensions has been added. Page 22 shows that SMB3

Hi, I want to use the SMB3 POSIX extensions in the latest Samba (with SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1). By following the user manual, I have added the "posix" mount option when mounting, but it shows the following error messages. Error messages: [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: Server does not support mounting with posix SMB3.11 extensions. [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -95 Mount option:

On 05/10/2019 06:49, Chris Han via samba wrote: > Hi, I want to use the SMB3 POSIX extensions in the latest Samba (with > SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1). By following the user manual, I have added the > "posix" mount option when mounting, but it shows the following error > messages. > > Error messages: > [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: Server does not support mounting with posix SMB3.11

Yes, I saw that they are different I was just willing to test something similar. Actually, I'm searching for a Samba feature that allow transparent failover, or continuos availablity in a cluster setup (Samba + ctbd + gluster) Based on the following link my understanding is that such feature is not currently available in Samba:

I passed by the changelog for the Linux CIFS Kernel Module at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFSKernel. The following two sections caught my attention: >> 4.19 Kernel (69 changesets, module version 2.13) >>Allow cifs.ko to be built with insecure dialects disabled (vers=1.0 and vers=2.0 not allowed). Add support for snapshot >> mounts (specifying "snapshot="

Hi @all, I have some problems when using pam_mount.conf.xml to mount shares via kerberos (and also for ntlm) regarding reliability of the mount. I have tested the issue with 2 different environments. My environments are: 2 Microsoft Domain Controllers + a separate fileserver and Ubuntu 18.04 or 22.04 as clients. My other tested environment is one Microsoft Server 2019 (as domain controller and

Hi everybody: Here is a new Ogg Traffic, with release announcements for Vorbis 1.0.1, Speex 1.0.3, and Icecast 2 Beta 1. The HTML version is at http://www.vorbis.com/ot/20031119.html. Enjoy! -Carsten <p>Ogg Traffic for Wednesday, November 19, 2003 Author: Carsten "Purple" Haese Contact: [1]carsten@xiph.org Date: November 19, 2003 Table of Contents 1

Hi all. Several years ago, Linux's CIFS kernel driver has implemented two little-known options, "idsfromsid" and "modefromsid" for Unix permission emulation. When both options are enabled, the Unix file user, group, and permissions are stored as SMB ACL entries, and is translated from, to, and checked as Unix permissions by the Linux client itself, without server

Hello guys, could someone help me better understand the mechanism of negotiating of the SMB protocol? I watch closely samba list and recently there was a talk about the 'smb.conf' parameters like eg. "max protocol =" etc. with regards to Windows 10 (and other windows clients of diff versions). I read Jeff_Layton-Linux-CIFS-Client.pdf and

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108651 --- Comment #2 from Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7 at gmail.com> --- compton itself does not have lots of dependencies. Right now all the users experienced this problem seems to be using the i3 window manager, I don't know if this is reproducible with windowmaker. I don't know the mesa version they use, I will ask. But judging that they are

When the world was young, Sandie carved some runes like this: > Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:23:24 -0600 > From: shui@yxepna01.pointsnorth.com > To: samba@anu.edu.au > Subject: Newbie to Samba [snip] > 1. Samba keeps it own set of password in private/smbpasswd after Samba > was installed. What's the use of those passwords? Are they being used to > perform validation if

Hi, This is really a follow on from Sandie's (shui@pointsnoth.com) problem of using samba to act as a domain logon server for NT Workstation 4. I have tried using samba2alpha8 (on Linux 2.0) and have failed to get the domain logon working from NT Workstation although Windows98 worked fine. I followed the instructions in Samba NT Domain FAQ apart from the use of encrypted passwords which

hello, Le 23/10/2019 ? 12:45, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 23/10/2019 10:51, nathalie ramat via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have an server ad? - everything seems ok >> I have a windows client and a linux client . The users must to >> connect on windows or on linux with the same home. >> >> when I join my client linux with the command net

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=888 Summary: Assertion errors attempting a statement which (I believe) is grammatically correct. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108651 Bug ID: 108651 Summary: Screen flickering when using compositor with OpenGL backend Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.4 This release contains a lot of bug fixes and new features contained up to the recent 3.18 kernel release (and some features coming up in the yet unreleased 3.19-rc). New features ============ * Add support for global ruleset operations (available since 3.18). Get rid of all tables, chains, and rules in one go: # nft

I know SMB2 support was added for the smbclient in samba 4.1.0, but was SMB3 support also added ? Is there a way to just make smbclient ? Mike

Hi all I am facing the following issue : I 've just installed a fresh windows 2003 server and want to add it to a samba 3 domain. netbios is ok on windows, I can log onto the smb server shares... but if I try to add the 2003 server to the domain it echoes the an error saying that the PDC for the domain XXX (netbios domain format, not dns) can't be found. I don't understand why

Hi, I am running samba-4.1.4 on my Fedora OS. I have provided the "client max protocol = SMB3" and "server max protocol = SMB3" parameters in smb.conf file I'm able to get only SMB2.1 packets using wireshark after fileshare access from my windows 7 machine. And not SMB3 packets. SMB2->NegotiateProtocol Response 0x0202 0x0210 Samba-4.1.4 is supporting SMB3 also. So

Hi, is there an option in samba 4.1.x to have an smbd require SMB3 encrypted transport on share level? I can't seem to find anything like it. Thanks, -- Michael Weiser science + computing ag Senior Systems Engineer Geschaeftsstelle Duesseldorf Faehrstrasse 1 phone: +49 211 302 708 32 D-40221 Duesseldorf fax: +49 211 302 708 50