similar to: Browsable Flag

It's not hidden like an hidden file or system file (things you can display tweaking some explorer options), it's not visible at all. I think there is no way to list them, it's not hidden, it's unlisted, but you still can access them if you know the full path. 2016-06-28 13:10 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: > > > Am 28.06.2016 um 09:53 schrieb

Am 28.06.2016 um 13:30 schrieb Thomas DEBESSE: > It's not hidden like an hidden file or system file (things you can > display tweaking some explorer options), it's not visible at all. I > think there is no way to list them, it's not hidden, it's unlisted, but > you still can access them if you know the full path. exactly what i said - so why the need to hit reply-all

Am 28.06.2016 um 09:53 schrieb tell at posteo.de: > the parameter "browsable (browseable)" is a Boolean which allows a share > to be displayed (or not) in list of machine resources. > > But if I set the parameter to "no" - how exactly does it hide the share? > I could not find a clue about the way of achieving that. the share is not listed - or what is your

Hi, thank your for your answer. > Are the 'File servers' joined to the domain ? Yes > Are the smb.conf files you posted complete No, they are abstracted ones, because they are very long > if not, can you post the complete ones, exactly as they are on the computers (you can sanitize them if you need to) Yes > Try taking a look here:

Hi, some months before, I was serving files and profiles using a Samba 3 PDC server (I will name it PDCSERV), this is some abstracts fro smb.conf: PDCSERV:/etc/samba/smb.conf [general] logon path = \\%N\profile logon drive = U: logon home = \\%N\%U logon script = "logon.cmd" valid users = %S [homes] path =

Hi, Is there an easily browsable and searchable archive for cfe-dev? I often find myself wanting to link to a particular email, and it’s a very time consuming process with a pipermail interface. I’ve noticed that llvm-dev is reposted to a google group (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/llvm-dev <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/llvm-dev>) which can be super convenient for that

Hey folks, We recently reIP'ed our main office LAN. Ever since this was done, none of our Samba hosts are browsable via Network Neighborhood. While they are still availible via Start -> Run -> \\servername, it's an annoying inconvenience. Stats: * PDC and BDC are NT domain controllers * Samba hosts are running several versions of Samba, from the later 2.0.* releases,

On 15 March 2018 at 02:21, George Karpenkov via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there an easily browsable and searchable archive for cfe-dev? > I often find myself wanting to link to a particular email, and it’s a very > time consuming process with a pipermail interface. > I’ve noticed that llvm-dev is reposted to a google group >

On 29/10/15 05:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd >> process". >> >> It's true enough that I can't browse my DC, however, there is an

I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc) replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). When I first launch Samba using `sudo samba`, I can go to the Windows server and browse to \\newdc in Explorer, and I see mytestshare, netlogon, printers, sysvol, and "Printers and Faxes". After a while (I'm not sure how long precisely, but under 24 hours) I could not navigate

> OK, I think your problem is that you are trying to run your AD domain as if it is still an NT4-style domain. This does not sound like a surprise to me. ;-) > with AD, you would add […] to each users object in AD. You can do this with ADUC or by creating an ldif file on the DC and then use ldbmodify to add it. Oh, yes, you're right, I had to do the same for the logon.cmd, I already

Hi, In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd process". It's true enough that I can't browse my DC, however, there is an active nmbd process on my Samba server. So I wonder if the explanation of the author is (still) correct. I couldn't find any supporting or contradicting

Hi everyone, I am new to the list and new to Linux as well as to Samba. I've read quite a few howtos, man-pages and other docs on samba now. I configured my own SMB-server with smbd and nmbd. Of course I generated a smb.conf file and my server is accessible and running on the Linux mashine. I can connect with smbclient to the Linux-mashine and to the win2k-mashine (hostname and service

boah how i hate that "reply all" attitude leading to break "reply to list" and leads in off-list replies -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot not honoring configuration settings (auth failure) Datum: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:02:42 +0200 Von: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> Organisation: the lounge interactive design An: noloader at

Hi all Sometimes I check in a controller if the method is GET or POST. But afaik there are other methods - do I have to care about them? Is the following enough? if request.get? ... elsif request.post? ... end Or do I have to add also an else block? if request.get? ... elsif request.post? ... else raise "Boah!" end Thanks for infos Josh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. >From testing it seems that :addresses only adds addresses to the list of "known" emails to check against. It is not limiting it. As I understand, sieve should check if To: header

On 04/11/15 05:08, Gary Dale wrote: > On 29/10/15 05:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >>> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd >>> process". >>> >>>

Hi. I recently moved a Samba v3.4.7 from being a PDC to a member of a Windows 2008 domain. Everything works fine, shares are visible and usable by users, but only by typing the server name, the server is NOT visible while browsing the network. The only "issue" i noticed is the DNS update error when doing "net ads join" command. I then manually added the DNS entry in windows

SMB.Confin File I can see the printers added in the CUPs, I observed that the samba is not setting the Browseable = yes parameter. See the samba configuration file and the output of Testparm: [printers] comment = Compartilhamento de Impressoras path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes guest ok = no read only = yes create mask = 0700 browseable = yes Saida do Testparm #

On 28.04.2016 11:16, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:00 schrieb tell at posteo.de: >> i'm trying to figure out some specific things about Samba DFS. >> >> 1. What is the ordering method of a DFS Share with multiple servers >> (e.g. msdfs:serverB\\share,serverC\\share linkb ; Source: >>