similar to: Badlock CVE-2016-2118 in samba release 3.0.35

Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? Thanks, Sam

Do you know why Red Hat updated libtdb as part of their remediation for Badlock on Samba4? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Sam Gardner wrote: > > Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba > 3.x > > imply an

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Sam Gardner wrote: > Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x > imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? > > If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? There were no tdb vulnerabilities in the badlock code release.

Hi, I am Madhu Kishore a Graduate student at University of Texas at El Paso in Electrical Engineering. I am using R language for Normality tests and my doubt is can implements the R functions in Matlab. I expect to hear from you soon. Madhu kishore. --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, This is Madhu and I have a following doubt please give a solution... **>i have the following data frame from this i want to select a 80% of data randomly in such a way that if the selected records are 1 and then we have to get the all records corresponding to 1 similarly for 2 also and soon......... help me data<-data.frame(x=c(1,1,2,2,2,3,4,4,4),y=c(23,45,87,46,78,12,87,79));**

Hello, I'm having problems getting the SAMBA domain to trust an NT domain. The following is how I went about the exercise: 1. On the NT domain, I added the SAMBA domain A/C in the TRUSTING DOMAINS list, providing a certain password. 2. On the SAMBA domain, I executed the following command feeding the same password given in step 1, but without success: [root@cobra root]# net rpc trustdom

Hi, Due to "Red Hat Vulnerability Response: BADLOCK", an automatic samba package RHEL5 update was apply on our system. This broke "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed" (error message logon client) in my environnement production. So, I use now 3.6.23-12.el5_11, I see they are new directive for smb.conf and some others more restrict

Hi, When I connect to SAMBA using a particular username, apart from the shares I created, it appears that the home directory of the user logging in also shows up in the share list. I searched for a parameter using which I could control this, but was unsuccessful. The [HOMES] section of my SMB.CONF looks like: [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No create mask

Hi, We support an older version SMB1 server (propietary implementation) which does not support extended security . Mapping a share from that server, using smbclient, was working before applying badlock patches (to the smbclient) , with default settings in smb.conf. However, after applying badlock patches, smbclient fails to map with default settings. When I set the option : "client ntlmv2

Hi, Finally, I have launched "yum downgrade samba*" too for best effort. I am waiting for news until my samba 4 migration. AC-GUYANE <mailto:Johan.Glenac at ac-guyane.fr> *Johan GLENAC* *DSI* Administrateur Système, Réseaux et Télécom *TROUBIRAN :* Route de Baduel - BP 6011 97306 Cayenne *Tél. :* +594 (0) 594 27 22 08 *Fax :* +594 (0) 594 27 22 20 Rectorat - Académie de la

Hi, I have a system running FC2 with SAMBA-3.0.10-1.fc2 installed on it. I tried de-installing it, but it failed as follows: [root@cobra /]# rpm -e samba error: Failed dependencies: samba is needed by (installed) system-config-samba-1.2.22-0.fc2.1 samba = 0:3.0.10 is needed by (installed) samba-swat-3.0.10-1.fc2 Can anyone suggest how I could go about de-installing the kit?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody, since the patch for all the badlock bugs it is not possible to access a Samba 4 ADDC-database with ldb-tools. Everytime I try it, I get the following error: root at addc-02:~# ldbsearch -H ldaps://addc-02.example2.net -U administrat or TLS failed to missing crlfile - with 'tls verify peer = as_strict_as_possible' When I

ORACLE have released this patch for Solaris 10 - Samba v3.6.25: IDR152387-03 addressing CVE-2016-2118 (BADLOCK) and other CVEs for S10 SPARC Which has addressed our issue. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Gaiseric Vandal Sent: 07 June 2016 14:51 To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Solaris 10 Configure failure

Hello, I want to avoid transferring a file which is present both on the source tree and on the target tree when calling rsync with -a --delete. mkdir -pv src/ dst/ echo file1 > src/file echo file2 > dst/file rsync -navi --delete --exclude file src/ dst/ works as expected. The file is not transferred nor is it deleted at the receiver. rsync -navi --delete --filter '- file' src/

Hi, I installed XEN 3.4-testing version without much problems in CentOS 5.3 running on quadcore Intel Nahelam processors using the following installation steps (as in the README) : <steps> hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg` cd xen-unstable.hg make world make install make linux-2.6-xen-config CONFIGMODE=menuconfig make linux-2.6-xen-build make linux-2.6-xen-install

Hi, I have two Linux systems, one running FC2 and the other Mandrake 10.1. When I tried installing Samba 3.0.11 on both the systems, I get the following error: # rpm -i samba-3.0.11-1.i386.rpm samba-common-3.0.11-1.i386.rpm warning: samba-3.0.11-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID f17f9772 error: Failed dependencies: liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by samba-3.0.11-1

Currently running version 3.6.25 on a SPARC Solaris 10 64 bit server. Due to CVE-2016-2118 need to upgrade to version 4.2.11 / 4.3.8 / 4.4.2 No Solaris package available. Configure script fails with “Couldn't determine size of 'bool'” Is it possible to install these versions on Solaris 10 and if so how? Many Thanks Steve. This Email and any attachments contains confidential

Hello, I'd like to understand the use-cases to use SMB multichannel. Especially, if the SMB client and Samba server are talking over the WAN. When does one see an improvement in throughput with multichannel? For instance, does copying multiple files result in parallel copying over multiple connections over the same session? Your inputs are appreciated. Thanks, Madhu

Hi, Can someone point me to the list of pre-requisites from a linux box (preferably a VM) for Samba to support SMB Multichannel? For instance, if multiple interfaces are needed, then should they be of the same type, speed etc? Thanks, Madhu

Thanks for your reply, Louis However, I am still blocked by this problem now. !-_- I tried to set the samba server as the DNS server and visit the shared folder by input "\\aaa.bb.com" at windows 7 client. In some cases it works and will not fail. However the similar abnormal phenomenon also occasionally happens (especially at changing the authentication, such as local to ldap): 1) I can