similar to: Two-way trusts

> Il 04/07/2014 18:19, Marc Muehlfeld ha scritto: > It's on the "Roadmap" page > (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap#Trust_support). But no > timeline or planned version yet. By reading https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap#Trust_support seems that trust support is not finished yet, btw in changelogs seems that in 4.2.* (with winbindd) interdomain trusts are

On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 11:37 +0100, Klaus Hartnegg wrote: > Am 10.03.2015 um 11:00 schrieb Sergio Rizzi: > > By reading https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap#Trust_support seems > > that trust support is not finished yet, btw in changelogs seems that in > > 4.2.* (with winbindd) interdomain trusts are now working. > > The release notes say that windindd "paves

Trust support is still considered experimental per the wiki. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Trust_Support One of the limitations is "You cannot add users and groups of a trusted domain into domain groups." This may be applicable to your issue. On 10/24/2016 9:59 PM, Владимир Ельцов via samba wrote: > Really nobody uses Samba 4 AD with trust relationships and GPOs? > --

Hi all. I have installed Samba 4.5.0 in CentOS 7 for testing Samba AD for my organisation. Almost all is OK, except trusts. When I setup trust on Samba4 domain side, at once GPO stops working. In windows event log on the domain members I see error with event id 1110: "The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not determine if the user and computer accounts are in the same forest.

On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 22:14 +0200, Davy Defaud via samba wrote: > > So, what’s the current status now? I can see RODC and SUBDOMAIN on the > roadmap. > But, as there are not “FUNDED”, is there someone actually working on it? > If so, are they targeted for a particular version or just “when it’s ready”? RODC support has been funded as is pretty good as of 4.8. There are still some

Hi, I've read about all recent changes about workflow: Fedora>CentOS Stream. I understood that in the end CentOS Linux (8) keeps on being "built from publicly available open source source code provided by Red Hat, Inc for Red Hat Enterprise Linux"[1] Is that correct? I mean the only that changed are CentOS upstream (Fedora and Centos Stream) didn't it? Thanks in advance

Aki, thanks, I fixed typo but error persists: Mar 7 10:55:54 mail dovecot: auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=10828) Mar 7 10:55:55 mail dovecot: auth: Debug: client in: AUTH#0111#011CRAM-MD5#011service=imap#011secured#011session=FIH/6tJm4gDAqHoB#011lip=192.168.122.202#011rip=192.168.122.1#011lport=993#011rport=37090 Mar 7 10:55:55 mail dovecot: auth: Debug: client passdb out:

Hi, I get this error even when user logins succesfully: Mar 7 10:41:16 mail dovecot: auth: Debug: client in: AUTH#0111#011CRAM-MD5#011service=imap#011secured#011session=maOgttJmCADAqHoB#011lip=192.168.122.202#011rip=192.168.122.1#011lport=993#011rport=36872 Mar 7 10:41:16 mail dovecot: auth: Debug: client passdb out: CONT#0111#011PDYyMjM4NTMwODIyODI0MDguMTUyMDQzMDA3NkBtYWlsLmV4YW1wbGUuY29tPg==

Hello Dovecot list. I need that Dovecot log writes mailbox size in all POP / IMAP connections, but I do not know if Dovecot can do that. I have been searching about that with not successful. For example, this is the log of our last email platform, different than Dovecot: 06:48:14 025BEE83 POP3 LOGIN user 'xxx at xxx.com' MailboxSize = 61708 Capacity = 2% ...... 06:49:19 025BEE83 POP3

Hi folks, Firstly, the first: dovecot --version 2.2.10 dovecot -n # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) auth_debug = yes auth_krb5_keytab = /var/lib/dovecot/krb5.keytab auth_master_user_separator = * auth_mechanisms = plain login gssapi auth_verbose = yes debug_log_path = /dev/null default_process_limit = 400

Something like this. But this link has no info that I need. On the roadmap: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap There is information <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend#.28De.29motivation> about general purpose LDAP server as the backend (e.g. openLDAP). But that's not what i was looking for. I looking for status of `passdb backend = ldapsam` feature. This

On Sun, 6 May 2018 22:14:38 +0200 Davy Defaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Le 06/05/2018 à 19:27, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > > On Sun, 6 May 2018 18:48:40 +0200 > > Davy Defaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >>> Thanks very much for making AD trusts /really/ usable at last in > >>> 4.8. For my

I have an NT4 PDC that I would like to replace with a Samba server. My network also has a box running MS Exchange and Backoffice (not the same box as the PDC). What's the general roadmap for doing this? Could I install Samba as a BDC and then promote it. Should I create a new domain on Samba and do a big cutover? Or is there a way to just get the necessary info off the PDC and then

On Sun, 6 May 2018 18:48:40 +0200 Davy Defaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Thanks very much for making AD trusts /really/ usable at last in > > 4.8. For my use case just allowing trusted groups to access file > > shares with correct permissions is good enough for now. Child > > domains would be nice too ;-) > > Dear Samba developers, >

News to me. Probably worth considering when choosing your deployment options. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/09/salesforce_why_buy_heroku/print.html Dreamforce 2010 Why would a company that spent 10 years delivering CRM as a service drop $212m in cash and $27m in stock on a 30-person startup that hosts Ruby on Rails apps for devs on Amazon? Salesforce.com vice president of technology and

Hi everybody, I am trying to fit a GAM model without intercept using library mgcv. However, the result has nothing to do with the observed data. In fact the predicted points are far from the predicted points obtained from the model with intercept. For example: #First I generate some simulated data: library(mgcv) x<-seq(0,10,length=100) y<-x^2+rnorm(100) #then I fit a gam model with

El jue., 12 jul. 2018 a las 11:57, Rowland Penny via samba (< samba at lists.samba.org>) escribió: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:44:47 -0300 > Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: > > > El jue., 12 jul. 2018 a las 9:44, Rowland Penny via samba (< > > samba at lists.samba.org>) escribió: > > > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:34:59 -0300 > >

2015-11-12 15:56 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de>: > On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as >> follows: >> >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own >> address as source address >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0:

Dear all: I am having some problems to use the function "sink()". Basically I am doing a loop over two files which contain unit-root variables. Then on a loop, I extract every i element of both files to create an object called z. If z meets some requirements, then I perform a unit root test (ADF test), otherwise not. As this process is repeated several times, for each i I want to get

Hi Timo, congrats to the merger with OX. Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support to - maybe - increase the priority in your roadmap: I'm currently working on a project to publish bank customer related documents inside a banking