similar to: Advice on CVE-2016-2118

Rowland penny via samba ha scritto il 27/08/20 alle 16:43: > [...] > Netbios is intrinsically tied to SMBv1 and? LLMNR (Link-Local Multicast > Name Resolution) is also connected in a way, it allows name resolutions > without a nameserver. So, if you are using it, I personally wouldn't, > ever heard of MITM ? Just to understand a little more... NetBIOS with a wins server

Hi All, We're using CTDB to cluster protocols over a large SAN and have had some pain related to a bit of a design flaw: we store CTDB and protocol-specific accounting files (recovery locks, state files, etc) on the same filesystem that we're offering through CTDB itself. This makes our front-end services pretty intolerant of flapping in the back-end filesystem, which is obviously not

On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 15:39 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Karolin Seeger via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > (Both as classic/NT4-style and active direcory DC.) > > I've searched some info on impact of this bug on NT domains, finding > nothing on the net. > > OK, NT domain are dead, i know, but... i seek some feedback. > On real

Hi, Samba has released patch for CVE-2016-2118 from 3.6.x release onwards. We use samba 3.0.35 in our product. Is there any patch available for 3.0.35? -- Regards Madhu

Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? Thanks, Sam

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Sam Gardner wrote: > Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x > imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? > > If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? There were no tdb vulnerabilities in the badlock code release.

Do you know why Red Hat updated libtdb as part of their remediation for Badlock on Samba4? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Sam Gardner wrote: > > Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba > 3.x > > imply an

Hi Jeremy, Thanks so much for your reply! As a matter of fact, we did just that around 3:45p yesterday when our CTDB cluster was unable to self-heal from the latest in this series of failover events. Here's how the situation went down: 1) We saw flapping identical to that described in my original post 2) After about 30 minutes of waiting, CTDB was just spinning with `smbd` repeatedly

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19622 Summary: 9100m G card (for acer aspire 4350) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

I don't think it's especially hard, but just not specifically unimplemented because nobody's had a strong need for it. There's probably some combinations of code models and machines that does happen to work (e.g. emutls+linux+large-code+large-data+no-PIC). Julia has some support for thread locals, but as a JIT in control of the language we currently try to generate better code than

Hi All, My site has two separate clustered Samba instances (managed by two independent CTDB instances) running over GPFS. In the last couple of weeks, we have seen a recurring issue that causes the `smbd` process in *one* of these instances to become unresponsive (as seen by CTDB), which results in flapping of CTDB and multiple IP takeover runs. The symptoms that we observe are: 1) Samba

Hi, I have the SSH Terrapin Prefix Truncation Weakness on Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.7 (Ootpa). The details are as follows. # rpm -qa | grep openssh openssh-8.0p1-16.el8.x86_64 openssh-askpass-8.0p1-16.el8.x86_64 openssh-server-8.0p1-16.el8.x86_64 openssh-clients-8.0p1-16.el8.x86_64 # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.7 (Ootpa) # SSH Terrapin Prefix Truncation

Hi, Are there any open source tools to keep track of ssh sessions? For example, if a specific user is ssh logging to remote server and what commands or scripts are being run. Basically, i need to log all users sessions. Thanks in Advance and i look forward to hearing from you. Best Regards, Kaushal

On 10/30/20 4:51 PM, Pawel Winogrodzki wrote: > Hello, > > We are currently trying to apply a patch to our 8.0p1 version of OpenSSH for CVE-2020-14145<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14145>. The "patch" tag from NIST's web page links to the 8.3p1 vs 8.4p1 comparison<https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/compare/V_8_3_P1...V_8_4_P1> on GitHub. Is

I'm currently looking to interconnect my Asterisk PBX system with the PSTN via a digital PRI/T1. I know a multitude of options exist for internal PCI cards (Digium/Sangoma/Rhino), I was wondering if anyone has any experience or recommendations of external PRI media gateways that support SIP. So far I've found: VegaStream Vega 400 Audiocodes Mediant 2000 MediaTrix 1531 However they are

This had also came up at llvm-devmtg briefly at the JIT roundtable. One of the collaborators on my project had started a patch years ago to implement some of it https://reviews.llvm.org/D8815, but then we went a different direction with TLS in our frontend and it became unnecessary. On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 12:36 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > +Lang

If I read this correctly, starttls will fail due to the MITM attack. That is the client knows security has been compromised. Using SSL/TLS, the MITM can use SSL stripping. Since most Postifx conf use "may" for security, the message would go though unencrypted. Correct??? Is there something to enable for perfect forward security with starttls? ? Original Message ? From: s.arcus at

The following applies to Samba used as domain controller only. (Both as classic/NT4-style and active direcory DC.) Samba users have reported that the exploit for "ZeroLogin" passes against Samba. Samba has some protection for this issue because since Samba 4.8 we have set a default of 'server schannel = yes'. Users who have changed this default are hereby warned that

The following applies to Samba used as domain controller only. (Both as classic/NT4-style and active direcory DC.) Samba users have reported that the exploit for "ZeroLogin" passes against Samba. Samba has some protection for this issue because since Samba 4.8 we have set a default of 'server schannel = yes'. Users who have changed this default are hereby warned that

I have the data similar to the following in a data frame: LastName Department Salary 1 Johnson IT 56000 2 James HR 54223 3 Howe Finance 80000 4 Jones Finance 82000 5 Norwood IT 67000 6 Benson Sales 76000 7 Smith Sales 65778 8 Baker HR 56778 9 Dempsey HR 78999 10 Nolan