similar to: Browing in Samba4 AD domain

Thanks for replying. I wasn't sure about what the link tried to tell me but you just have confirmed it :) So, if I understood correctly, do I have to setup a WINS server in another member machine (let's say another Samba host) and point all my windows computers to such Samba as WINS server? On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On

I've found an old thread in which you were participating: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-February/189471.html It's more clear to me now but not at all. Since there seems to be different code for nbt and nmbd which handle WINS replication and browsing, which feature is what I need to setup in my MS network for properly browse all the machines in the domain? I would ask again,

On 31/03/16 05:15, Jason Voorhees wrote: > Hello guys: > > Some weeks ago I've implemented a couple of Samba4 servers. One of them > running Zentyal 4.2 Development version and the other one on a Samba built > from source on CentOS 7. Both are running Samba 4.3.4. > > There are 35 machines joined to my domain and users are complaining that > they can't see all the

Hello guys, Rowland :) I recently had the opportunity to configure a Samba 3.x server which acts as a WIN server. For testing purposes only, I've configured a group of 4 Windows machines to use my Samba 3.x host as WINS server but unfortunately those 4 hosts were not able to see each other in the windows browsing list. I might guess WINS is only providing NetBIOS name resolution but no

On 01/04/16 19:05, Jason Voorhees wrote: > I've found an old thread in which you were participating: > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-February/189471.html > > It's more clear to me now but not at all. Since there seems to be > different code for nbt and nmbd which handle WINS replication and > browsing, which feature is what I need to setup in my MS

I actually have nmbd running on my Samba 3.x domain member server. Does nmbd need an special setup for maintaining the network browsing list for windows machines? On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:20 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > I would say you need nmbd for browsing... > > 2016-04-19 14:16 GMT+02:00 Jason Voorhees <jvoorhees1 at gmail.com>: >>

On 01/04/16 19:51, Jason Voorhees wrote: > If AD domains are based on DNS and WINS relies on NetBIOS, what > protocol(s) are used by computers to create and see (browse) all the > machines of the domain? As far as Samba is concerned it uses both, DNS & NetBIOS, but instead of using WINS, it uses DNS to find the machines and then 'nmbd' produces the browsing list (this is

Hello guys, hope you're doing good: I'm running a couple of Samba servers like follows: Primary DC ========= Platform: Zentyal 4.2 development x68_64 Samba: 4.3.4-Zentyal DNS: BIND9_DLZ_module Role: Primary Domain Controller Setup: By default, following Zentyal's web interface. Secondary DC =========== Platform: CentOS 7 x86_64 Samba: 4.3.4 built from source DNS: SAMBA_INTERNAL

I would say you need nmbd for browsing... 2016-04-19 14:16 GMT+02:00 Jason Voorhees <jvoorhees1 at gmail.com>: > Hello guys, Rowland :) > > I recently had the opportunity to configure a Samba 3.x server which > acts as a WIN server. For testing purposes only, I've configured a > group of 4 Windows machines to use my Samba 3.x host as WINS server > but unfortunately

If AD domains are based on DNS and WINS relies on NetBIOS, what protocol(s) are used by computers to create and see (browse) all the machines of the domain? While it's clear to me that a hostname will resolve to an IP address through DNS queries, I'm not sure how is the browsing list created and maintained. In old NT style domain, any computer of the domain could be selected to act as a

Hello Rowland, thanks for your help. My replies lines below: > Do the DCs point at each other for dns ? > > i.e. is /etc/resolv.conf on the first DC something like this: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.second.dc > nameserver ip.of.this.dc > > and on the second DC: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.first.dc > nameserver

Hello guys. I have a Zentyal 4.2 server which runs Samba 4.3.5 and ACLs for every share. It's currently working fine, no isssues, everyone can access their folders without problems. I've built a Samba 4.3.5 server in a different host which is not a Zentyal server. I've configured this 2nd server as DC. Once a day I run a script to synchronize all shares from my Zentyal to this Samba

Thanks again Rowland. It isn't 100% clear to me yet, hehe :p, but it's time for testing, debugging and posting with my results. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 01/04/16 19:51, Jason Voorhees wrote: > >> If AD domains are based on DNS and WINS relies on NetBIOS, what >> protocol(s) are used by computers to create

Hi people: I'm using Samba 3.5.11 with some sharing settings like these: [global] workgroup = MARKETING netbios name = SMBSERVER server string = Samba, OpenLDAP Server obey pam restrictions = Yes passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldap://localhost" passwd program = /usr/sbin/smbldap-passwd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n

> OK, you have two DCs, on one, your user can access a share, you basically > copy the shares to another DC (with all the same permissions etc) and your > user cannot access the share on the second DC. > > How is AD set up ? are you using uidNumber & gidNumber attributes (you will > have added them manually) or are you using the xidNumbers created > automatically by

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 28/04/16 07:31, Mueller wrote: >> >> This is a normal behaviour if you are using several dcs. Users und groups >> do have another gid/uid on each server >> until you fix it manually. This was a hard experiennce and work even fo >> rme which I suggest that this should be >>

Hi: Reading Red Hat''s Website and a printed manual of RH184 (Red Hat Virtualization course) I see that RHEL 5 only supports RHEL 4.5 and RHEL 5 as paravirtualized guests. So I asume this is the same situation for CentOS 5, right? What''s the dependency between Xen versions for paravirtualized guests? I ask this questions because I got this experiences: 1. Running CentOS 5 as

Hey guys, thanks for your time. Unfortunately, I've been busy so I wasn't able to test it again. Just today I started to read, investigate and test all this stuff you suggested me. I don't fully understand yet how uidNumbers and xidNumbers work, all I know is that Zentyal is using the old winbind daemon instead of the new winbindd. There are many concepts that I don't know how

What have you joined it to ? zentyal 4.2.11, Samba version 4.3.4-Zentyal El 12/14/2017 a las 11:49 AM, Rowland Penny via samba escribió: > What have you joined it to ?

Hi: I'm trying to join a samba 4.3.4 (as an additional domain controller) to a domain with Zentyal 4.3 (That has samba 4.3.4 inside). I know that this is an old samba version but I cann't upgrade zentyal first. So, When I can join the samba 4.3.4 to the domain I will demote the Zentyal. But when I try: samba-tool domain join dtcf.etecsa.cu DC -U "DTCF\administrator"