similar to: snooping windows 10 - how to stop it on a linux gateway?

I didn't setup any ssh-keys for authentication yet. Sorry. > Karel Lang AFD <lang at afd.cz> hat am 23. Februar 2015 um 14:48 geschrieben: > > > Hi there, > isn't possible, that the problem is just very basic and you've got a > authentication set via ssh-key on admin locally on the server you try to > logon? > Just saying .. > > cheers :]

Hi all, I have installed Samba AD Domain for testing and it works fine. Only problem is that when i create new user with "samba-tool user create $USERNAME --must-change-at-next-login" or via ADUC in RSAT with "user must change password at first login" i cannot change password at all. When i try login i get prompt that i have to change password so i write new password,

Hello, if anybody would kindly have anything to advice, please, please - do :-) SETUP: Fedora 28 + Samba 4.8.5 AD (testing environment consisting of 1 Samba server and 1 joined windows machine and 1 account) :-) PROBLEM: the "--must-change-at-next-login" is the problematic part after creating user, with this attribute the user is authenticated OK during FIRST Logon BUT!! when

ssh -v shows which authentication modules are used. Might be GSSAPI/Kerberos, e.g. On 2015-02-23 15:08, Tim wrote: > I didn't setup any ssh-keys for authentication yet. Sorry. > > > >> Karel Lang AFD <lang at afd.cz> hat am 23. Februar 2015 um 14:48 geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi there, >> isn't possible, that the problem is just very basic and

Hello guys, could someone help me better understand the mechanism of negotiating of the SMB protocol? I watch closely samba list and recently there was a talk about the 'smb.conf' parameters like eg. "max protocol =" etc. with regards to Windows 10 (and other windows clients of diff versions). I read Jeff_Layton-Linux-CIFS-Client.pdf and

Hi Rowland, Thanks for the informations. Yes, the Fedora Samba 4 package is built with MIT kerberos. I know it is still 'fresh' so that is what i do - run tests :-). Actually this thing with password expiration, is only thing i found so far, otherwise, it 'behaved' surprisingly well. Thanks again! Karel -- *Karel Lang* *Unix/Linux Administration* lang at afd.cz | +420 731 13

Hi, isn't it possible, that your new Samba4 server uses higher SMB protocol, than the old MS windows XP machine can understand/handle? Not sure about this, but might be worth checking? cheers :] -- *Karel Lang* *Unix/Linux Administration* lang at afd.cz | +420 731 13 40 40 AUFEER DESIGN, s.r.o. | www.aufeerdesign.cz On 03/06/2015 02:42 AM, Al Schapira wrote: > Hello, > > A

Hello guys, i just wanted to ask about an idea, if it is feasible (or not). The company i work for (350 users) has 2 branches, that are interconnected with HQ via L2TP (encapsulated in IPsec) tunnels, that are setup in between Mikrotik routers. current setup: 300 users | HQ 192.168.2.0/23 | | Samba PDC + LDAP | | (389 DS) backend | | | | | / \ 30 users /

Hi, this reminds me of my troubles of setting up samba BDC at remote company branch. Connection was done by IPSEC tunnel between 2 mikrotik routers. Thing was, ipsec supports only unicast, but not multicast,nor broadcast. Solved it by adding L2TP tunnel that support the above mentioned mechanisms. So ended up with the l2tp (which has very weak encryption and is very old and vulnerable)

On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 18:13:16 CEST Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 17:16 +0200, Karel Lang AFD via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > if anybody would kindly have anything to advice, please, please - do > > > > :-) > > > > SETUP: > > Fedora 28 + Samba 4.8.5 AD (testing environment consisting of 1 > > Samba > > server

Hi, I've configured sssd so far as advised in the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Local_user_management_and_authentication/sssd getent passwd/group works. Everything seems to be fine. But now I realized, that when I use my domain admin user account to login on that server via ssh, it is not asking for a password. Normal user must authenticate with a password. Where should I look

Hi all, We are trying to upgrade to iptables 1.4.1+ however the ipp2p module now it is included in the xtables-addons modules. In the xtables-addons modules the commad line for ipp2p is changed and the -m ipp2p --ipp2p option is not supported anymore .... instead the maintainer requires that we use -m ipp2p --bit ... -m ipp2p --kaza for each different P2P protocol. as a result shorewall does

Hi everyone, Xtables-addons 1.5.4 has been released; highlights of this release are the import, cleanup/bugfixing the "condition" and "ipp2p" matches and additionally extending the "IPMARK" by IPv6. I hope people don''t mind, but I have not heard back so far, so I take it it''s ok. LOGMARK (for analyzing packet marks and connection states) now

Hello Users, I googled Call Snooping, its shows only the it means, But i didn't find How to dialplan the Call Snooping, I seen that " What is Trixbox " in Asterisk I Use only some Feature in Asterisk (20), Is it need Asterisk to install the TrixBox in that same System where i installed the Asterisk Server Help me please :P -- Thanks and Regards Ravi Prakash Sunkara

Hi, Here are two, small feature changes I would like to submit to increase the usefulness of the multicast snooping of the bridge code. The first patch is an unaltered one I had submitted before, but since it got no feedback I'm resubmitting it here for net-next. With the recently added patch to disable snooping if there is no querier (b00589af + 248ba8ec05 + 8d50af4fb), it should be a safe

Hello...I have a Slackware based machine doing routing & QoS for my internal LAN users... It has two interfaces: eth1(100mbps) that connects to the aDSL modem(USR 9105) and eth0(100mbps) that connects to my local LAN... I''am using shorewall as a firewall...i think it''s configured well as it''s working as i want and i pass all the online firewall tests... :D All lan

I''m try to insert a snooping/modifying application in a network without changing the network. That is, I want to take a linux box with two ethernet ports and put it between two existing systems without changing the original IPs. So, I want to change (for example) this: host(192.168.253.1) | | target(192.168.253.2) to: host(192.168.253.1) | |

Hi, Is there an IGMP Snooping implementation in development in the bridge module ? Is the bridge module a good place for this feature ? It is better to add it in the module or in user space ? Regards, Nicolas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20080411/aff8a2cf/attachment.htm

To all who have holidays this time of year :-). And may all our Samba-related wishes come true in 2015 :-). Cheers, Jeremy.

It has been a while since I have had to annoy you. You may be pleased to know that my server has been working quite well...until recently. I think it is because of a power hit we took recently. I don't know which came first, but I have four symptoms: 1) When I log in on a Windows machine, with an account that should have administrator permissions, I don't have said admin rights. 2)