similar to: Osync error for sysvol directory : rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file Invalid argument (22)

Hello rsync users, I'm trying to copy every file which belongs to my Ubuntu 23.04 installation (stored on an ext4 fs to a ZFS storage disk. The command that I've used is : # rsync -avxHAX * /mnt/zroot2/zroot2/OS/Linux/EVO sending incremental file list rsync: [generator] set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(dev/kvm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported (95) rsync: [generator] set_acl:

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: vrijdag 24 april 2015 11:06 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1 > >On 24/04/15 09:52, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Im having a strange thing with

When using the following to keep duplicate files on multiple computers, I find some files have their ACLs changed and cannot then be opened. I am using the following command. My goal is to be able to read/write/edit any local or remote file from any machine. Until recently this worked just fine, but now some files cannot be opened once rsync'd. rsync -avzh --progress --delete --super -A

Hai, ? Im having a strange thing with sernet samba 4.2.1 on debian wheezy. ? I installed 2 dc.s with my scripts. ? i did setup the sysvol replication and now im seeing the following when i create new policies. ? The default GPO's drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Apr 24 10:17 {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators

Hello, 1) fs acl support I use XFS I did the tests ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support ) and no errors [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -d test.txt # file: test.txt user.test="test" [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt # file:

I am trying to replicate a samba-4.3 DC [192.168.8.65] to a newly joined samba-4.10 DC. I am using rsync as described in the samba wiki, excepting that I am using a remote shell (ssh) with the root user and password-less logins. When I run the command below from the 4.10 DC I get acl errors as shown below. rsync -XAavz --delete-after --rsh='ssh' [192.168.8.65]:/var/db/samba4/sysvol

Hello , ( samba 4.6.9 - centos 6 DC1 centos DC2 ) I tried to sync sysvol as described in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround between two DC but rsync shows some errors like this rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(apam-ad.apam.it/Policies/{D725AAC4-27E8-46AC-918D-55B560988386}/Machine/Applications/{031B2C75-D832-429B-B4C4-226BAA665E3A}.aas,

Best guess.. Can you check this : ( from the wiki ) Good: rsync --dry-run -XAavz --delete-after --password-file=/usr/local/samba/etc/rsync-sysvol.secret rsync://sysvol-replication@{IP-of-you-PDC}/SysVol/ /path/to/your/sysvol/folder/ Wrong. rsync --dry-run -XAavz --delete-after --password-file=/usr/local/samba/etc/rsync-sysvol.secret rsync://sysvol-replication@{IP-of-you-PDC}/SysVol/*

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hi ! I am trying to use rsync to copy ACL between two Windows hosts. First, I try locally on a Windows hosting an AD. If I use rsync 3, I get this (I get the same thing with latest snapshot): -bash-3.2$ ./rsync-HEAD-20070703-1547GMT/rsync.exe -aAv copieA/ copieB sending incremental file list recv_acl_access: value out of range: ff rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

I apologize in advance for asking a beginner question, but I really could not figure this from the manual page. I want to copy some files with rsync, and not copy others. The stuff that I do not want to copy looks like this: System Volume Information/_restore*/RP* WINDOWS/Prefetch/* Documents and Settings/leila/Local Settings/Application Data/Google/Chrome/Application/*/Installer/chrome.7z

There's a bug open against opensuse of an error occurring when creating a gpo via samba-tool. This only happens against a Samba addc (not Windows), and I can't reproduce it in the samba test environment (against master for 4.17.4). The original bug is here: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1206475 > samba-tool gpo create "Global Message2" -U Administrator

I am using rsync 3.0.3 to copy a remote RAID volume on one Xserve to the local RAID volume on an other Xserve. Both Xserves are running OS X Server 10.4.11. I have compiled rsync 3.0.3 on both machines and patched it following Mike Bombich's instructions at http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html After some struggles, and with invaluable help from the list, I how have an rsync script running

Check that ACL's are enabled on the destination volume. Details on how to do this are available from the following URL : http://connect.homeunix.com/lbackup/doku.php?id=access_control_lists Hope this helps. > I am using rsync 3.0.3 to copy a remote RAID volume on one Xserve to > the > local RAID volume on an other Xserve. Both Xserves are running OS X > Server > 10.4.11.

Greetings! During migrating i686 installation of ArchLinux to x86_64, all filesystem was rsynced to a new location. Maybe this somehow relates to the problem that has appeared after migrating and that did not happen before: during backuping the system, rsync reports the following error message: rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_delete_def_file(var/log/journal/remote): Operation not supported (95) The

If the filesystem doesn't support ACLs then don't use -A. Also, why is there samba between rsync and btrfs? On 06/23/2016 04:14 PM, Albert Berger wrote: > Greetings! > > During migrating i686 installation of ArchLinux to x86_64, all filesystem was rsynced to a new location. Maybe this somehow relates to the problem that has appeared after migrating and that did not happen

Hi Yassine, Thanks for the effort, unfortunately, we cannot turn it into an actual mailbox, this is a long story that I don't want to include here. but it would not be a valid option in our environment. Any other ideas Is it possible to do it with vacation? Is there another auto responder or plugin that can achieve this? How do ticketing systems handle this? Thanks Monis On Sun, Mar 10,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7884 Summary: Workaround for ACL problem with ZFS under FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: trasz at

kfree() handles NULL pointers fine - checking is redundant. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml at dif.dk> --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3-orig/fs/ext3/acl.c 2005-03-02 08:37:55.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/fs/ext3/acl.c 2005-03-25 22:41:41.000000000 +0100 @@ -197,8 +197,7 @@ ext3_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int ty acl = NULL; else acl = ERR_PTR(retval); - if (value) -

Since sending to the alias will send to a, b and c, just define the filter on one mailbox only instead of making it global I guess. Yassine. On 3/10/19 11:51 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > > I am curious to know how did you define the filter on an alias in the > first place ? is it a filter defined globaly in dovecot ? I don't see > how it can be defined in any