similar to: vfs_fruit in 4.3.4 Directory Renames with Open Files Problem

Hi Coan, On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 02:39:55PM -0600, Coan Dillahunty wrote: > Apple's SMB implementation in Server 5.0.15 on El Capitan 10.11.2 exhibits > the same problem and I’ve opened a case with Apple about the issue (case > 1029666009), as previously discussed, we try to be bug compatible with Apple. ;) The problem is, either way, allowing or not allowing directory renames with

In case of FreeBSD, the name of the extended attribute is wrong. % lsextattr user ICONandEA.txt ICONandEA.txt netatalk.Metadata com.apple.TextEncoding com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment "netatalk.Metadata" is incompatible to Netatalk. The first atom "org." is removed. source3/include/smb.h: /* Prefix for DosStreams in the vfs_streams_xattr module */ #define

Hello Thomas, According to posts on the MacAdmins slack<https://macadmins.slack.com/> smb_samba channel, this was a macOS Ventura problem impacting multiple SMB implementations. It's fixed in the macOS 13.4 update, even though the release notes don't mention it. Best regards, Coan Dillahunty This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain privileged and/or

Hi, as I have learned from the discussion about which SSD to use as ZIL drives, I stumbled across this article, that discusses short stroking for increasing IOPs on SAS and SATA drives: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/short-stroking-hdd,2157.html Now, I am wondering if using a mirror of such 15k SAS drives would be a good-enough fit for a ZIL on a zpool that is mainly used for file

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the reply and thank you for your work on vfs_fruit. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:40:32PM -0500, Ryan Bair wrote: > > I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The > > performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:20:54AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:05:33 +0100, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de>: > > iirc you need fruit:encoding = native > > Solved. Thanks! > I'm looking forward to netatalk 3.1.8. > > $ getfattr Mew.txt > # file: Mew.txt > user.com.apple.TextEncoding > user.com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment > >

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:14:25AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Hi, > > >> not sure, but the colon in xattr names is probably not handled > >> correctly at this point. Can you please file a bugreport so we can > >> track this? > > > > Bug 11162 > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11162 > > I tested samba 4.3.1 on Fedora 23 and rawhide.

On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > Hi, > I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > > The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > > smb.conf: > path = /export/test1/ > writable = yes > vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr > fruit:locking = netatalk > fruit:encoding = native > streams_xattr:prefix = user.

> not sure, but the colon in xattr names is probably not handled > correctly at this point. Can you please file a bugreport so we can > track this? Bug 11162 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11162 -- HAT

> well, the thing is, inheritance works as designed with fruit:nfs_aces=yes, it's > just that the client changes permissions *after* the fact... How icky. Is it b/c mac's don't understand the Linux (posix?) extended acl? I suppose Samba cannot tell when the client is changing the permissions as a misunderstanding versus purposefully? E.g. is the pattern of requests

Am 27.04.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Ralph Boehme: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:08:46AM -0700, Scott Call wrote: >> Thanks for the response! >> >> This would be really helpful because we use a lot of old adobe type 1 fonts >> that are 100% resource fork and are rendered unusable without the >> marshalled xattr's in addition to the AFP_ streams. > > resource

Hi Folks, We are seeing an issues where two OS X El Capitan clients opened a folder and one of them creates a "New Folder" (untitled folder) and renames it, on the other MAC client explorer the "unititled folder" remains same and unable to access it. Note: The samba version is 4.1.19 and we have not used the vfs_fruit module. attached packet capture where the SMB2 Find

In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. $ rm test.txt rm: test.txt: Resource busy cannot remove: OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite OS X 10.9.5 Mavericks can remove: OS X 10.8.5 Mountain Lion OS X 10.7.5 Lion OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard Windows 7 Environment: Fedora rawhide samba-4.3.3-0.fc24 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = LOCALNET server string

Hi, I configured Samba 4.8.5 on Debian (Buster) with vfs_fruit as a TimeMachine destination and while it detects it and does the initial backup to some extent (30GB out of 200GB), TimeMachine then fails with a message about the disk identity having changed. Options are “don’t backup” and “backup anyway”. When using “backup anyway”, the backup creates a secondary sparse image and starts from

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:33:10AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > > On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > >> > >> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > >> > >> smb.conf: > >> path =

Is it possible to backup Mac OS devices through a Samba share on Samba 4.4.6 on Fedora 24 with Time Machine? I am able to successfully advertise the share through Avahi, connect to it in Finder, and read/write files. I am also able to see the share as a destination in Time Machine, but selecting it shows an error that "The selected network backup disk does not support the required

Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >> >> $ rm test.txt >> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >> >> cannot remove: >> OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan >> OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite >> OS X 10.9.5

Hello, having migrated from OSX Server with AFP filesharing, we've experienced a problem with randomly occurring file losses on our samba server. Due to the fact we were not able to reproduce the problem reliably, we are quite clueless what could cause this behavior and therefore desperately looking for any hints. The Server in question is running Ubuntu 14.04LTS with the Version of Samba

(Dovecot 1.0.rc15) Hello I'm tring to configure postfix+dovecot on debian etch. In dovecot I use passdb pam and userdb passwd-file. I can connect pop3 clients and reveice mails and connect smtp clients and send mails, but it is delivered to /var/mail/%u instead the configured mailboxes in /var/local/dovecot/%u. I`ve configured postfix as say http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix.

I have a need to use the unsupported kernel for one feature only (AFP/Appletalk support). Never having had to use it before, I''m unsure of what''s all in it other than reading it''s config file. From those that do use it -- is it considered stable enough to use in lightweight production? I''m debating the use of it versus wasting my time rebuilding the normal