similar to: Patch Samba

Really my user IDs are different, but I can not adjust it. Using Samba 4.3.3 (Upgrade from 4.2 -> 4.3 -> 4.3.3), I think it has something it was initially used with Windows 2003 (no longer usaddo) to replicate data Win 2003 -> Samba. Today only own Samba (which had to increase Schema) Em 29-03-2016 10:27, Sketch escreveu: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >

Hello! I have 2 Samba 4 server (4.3.3) as VC and other Samba 4 (4.3) as Fileserver, until now all ok, but I'm one doubts, how to validate that in both servers the domain IDs of the users of this identical, a simple way to do this validation? I wanted to make sure it is a DC die fileserver has to go 100%. thank you

hehehe Thank you for your attention. Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be presented here. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba Application patch, exemple.... Bye!! Em 09-12-2015 12:11, L.P.H. van Belle escreveu: > Sorry none.. > > I suggest first upgrade to the latest 4.3.x > If it is still there, post again, but with some

Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki? Thanks Em 09-12-2015 13:47, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > Am 09.12.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> hehehe >> Thank you for your attention. >> Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be >> presented here. >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba

Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the samba, I use the method described it to upgrade my Samba 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba Em 09-12-2015 14:07, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki? > > Wiki? > how did you install

Ok, my installation was build following the official wiki Samba using OS like Ubuntu 14:04. Still the question remains how do I update the package? Following the wiki (I spent in another email) or otherwise? Thanks Em 09-12-2015 14:33, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the

In short, I follow what ja think I was telling to UPGRADE follow the Wiki(which is was the same as you gave me) My samba has been updated from version 4.2 to 4.3(used wiki), so said he was running since August. Thank you very much for your attention. Bye Em 09-12-2015 15:01, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Ok, my installation

I do not speak Spanish, I am using a web server, which is not locally on Samba 4, but on the same network. OS: CentOS 7 64-bit [Root @ webserver conf] # rpm -qa | grep httpd httpd-tools-2.4.6-31.el7.centos.x86_64 httpd-2.4.6-31.el7.centos.x86_64 [Root @ webserver conf] # [Root @ webserver conf] # rpm -qa | grep php php-pear-1.9.4-21.el7.noarch php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.14-1.el7.noarch

Hai Rowland. What you tried is ok, or im misunderstanding you. For me : All members give me. getent passwd myuser myuser:*:10002:10000::/home/users/myuser:/bin/bash id myuser uid=10002(myuser) gid=10000(domain users) the memberservers are or sernet samba 4.2.7 or debian samba 4.1.17 and on the DCs. ( only sernet samba 4.2.7 ) getent passwd myuser myuser:*:10002:10000:L.P.H. van

Hello! I am following the how to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_home_drives But even though there reported a process for User X does not access the home of Y User, this is happening root at fileserver:/srv/samba# getfacl home/ # file: home/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:root:rwx user:administrator:rwx group::r-x group:root:r-x group:5007:r-x group:domain\040admins:rwx

Hello! I'm not using graphical interface kkkkk hug Em 10-05-2016 15:35, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 10/05/16 18:37, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> I do not speak Spanish, I am using a web server, which is not locally >> on Samba 4, but on the same network. >> >> OS: CentOS 7 64-bit > > Are you running Gnome3 ?? if so, you do not need anything else, GDM3 >

Rowland I'm guessing I was wrong, but my fear now is that I change this setting, change my UID / GID, and stop sharing accesses. Is this going to happen? But by the very doubt, would that affect my problem, since it seems to be something with kerberos? Thanks Em 09-01-2017 09:16, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 08:59:40 -0200 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha"

You should run : ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" -s base possSuperiors If the result is : # record 1 dn: CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=DEVINLECLECLERC,DC=com possSuperiors: container possSuperiors: domainDNS possSuperiors: nisMap Then it's OK, the script tried to add a

Can return old id, returning the old values (changed the most at least two months) idmap config *: backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 5000-16777216 idmap config SERVERAD: backend = rid idmap config SERVERAD: range = 5000-33554431 The error parrou also, but I think the fact that a group with the same ID / GID if the User to the fact that the idmap values be crossing, even so I changed them

That's one things to add schema in your AD, that's another thing to use that schema. Adding schema for rfc2307 in AD grant you possibility to set uidNumber, gidNumber, loginShell and others attributes to your AD users. That grant you that possibility but you are free to use that possibility. Next step is to define xidNumber to your users. 2016-06-14 18:31 GMT+02:00 Carlos A. P. Cunha

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:32:08 -0300 "Carlos A. P. Cunha via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello! > > Any idea ? > > Regards > You can ignore the 'Not removing dangling forward link' errors, they do not affect AD. Rowland

Hello! I do not use sssd use winbind. When I mentioned in the lines workgroup and realm, they are like this (for example) Workgroup = INTRNAL Realm = INTERNAL.TESTE.COM.BR I do not know if that was what caused the confusion .... Thanks Em 08-01-2017 20:28, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:04:41 -0200 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at

msDS-isRODC is introduced in version 32 of the schema. This is the problem I faced. You can have a look to https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-August/193258.html. --------------------------------------------- Christophe Borivant Responsable d'exploitation informatique +33 5 62 20 71 71 (Poste 503) Devinlec - Groupe Leclerc -------------------------------------------- ----- Mail

:-| ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol Em 16-06-2017 13:38, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:15:19 -0300 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, sorry, uncomment a line :-D >> >> Yes exist! >> >> ls -ld

Hello! My smb.conf [global] workgroup = <DOMAIN> realm = <SUBDOMAIN.DOMAIN.COM.BR> security = ADS idmap config * : backend = rid idmap config * : range = 100000-999999 client schannel = no allow trusted domains = yes winbind use default domain = yes winbind refresh tickets = Yes winbind