similar to: Samba & Ceph

On 2016-01-08 at 09:31 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Dirk Laurenz wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > as anyone tried to install samba with/ontop on a ceph cluster? > > Try compiling and setting up with vfs_ceph. Correct, that's basically it. > Needs some more work, but should work. Some posix features are not quite there

On Wed, 2024-07-31 at 08:36 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > 31.07.2024 07:55, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Building current samba on debian bullseye with > > > > > > ??? ./configure --enable-cephfs > > > > > > results in

31.07.2024 07:55, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Building current samba on debian bullseye with >> >> ?? ./configure --enable-cephfs >> >> results in the following output: >> >> Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h????????????? : yes >> Checking for

Greetings all! I am in the process of deploying a POC around SAMBA and CEPH. I'm having some trouble locating concise instructions on how to get them to work together (without having to mount CEPH to the computer first and then exporting that mount via SAMBA). Right now, my stopper is trying to locate ceph.so for x64 CentOS 6.5. [2014/02/26 15:05:23.923617, 0]

Hi, I'm testing out ceph_vms vs a cephfs mount with a cifs export. I currently have 3 active ceph mds servers to maximise throughput and when I have configured a cephfs mount with a cifs export, I'm getting a reasonable benchmark results. However, when I tried some benchmarking with the ceph_vms module, I only got a 3rd of the comparable write throughput. I'm just wondering if

31.07.2024 09:38, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-31 at 08:36 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> The problem is that ceph is disabled by configure even if it is >> explicitly enabled by the command-line switch.? Configure should fail >> here instead of continuing, - *that* is the problem. > > This is/was always the situation because building

Hello Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error: ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available Here is my samba configuration: [global] clustering = Yes netbios name = FSCLUSTER realm = INT.EXAMPLE.COM registry

hi jeremy / all, On 11/6/19 10:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files, > yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba > onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ? yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted with an ext4 fs without any special options: root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in

On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > Hi! > > Building current samba on debian bullseye with > > ?? ./configure --enable-cephfs > > results in the following output: > > Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h????????????? : yes > Checking for library cephfs???????????????????????? : yes > Checking for ceph_statx in

Thanks Jack. That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider. In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:

Hi! Building current samba on debian bullseye with ./configure --enable-cephfs results in the following output: Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h : yes Checking for library cephfs : yes Checking for ceph_statx in cephfs : ok Checking for ceph_openat in cephfs : not found Ceph support disabled due to

Hi Folks, is the vfs_ceph supporting quota set on a directory inside cephfs? Regards Felix -- Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 52425 Jülich Sitz der Gesellschaft: Jülich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Düren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir. Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender), Karsten Beneke (stellv.

Hi, I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were. That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for live migrations to someday take place. In other words, I'm building things as if I were

Hi, I've recently been working on setting up a set of libvirt compute nodes that will be using a ceph rbd pool for storing vm disk image files. I've got a couple of issues I've run into. First, per the standard ceph documentation examples [1], the way to add a disk is to create a block in the VM definition XML that looks something like this: <disk type='network'

Hi all, I am looking in to ceph and cephfs and in my head I am comparing with gluster. The way I have been running gluster over the years is either a replicated or replicated-distributed clusters. The small setup we have had has been a replicated cluster with one arbiter and two fileservers. These fileservers has been configured with RAID6 and that raid has been used as the brick. If disaster

I'm sending this message to both dovecot and ceph-users ML so please don't mind if something seems too obvious for you. Hi, I have a question for both dovecot and ceph lists and below I'll explain what's going on. Regarding dbox format (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox), when using sdbox, a new file is stored for each email message. When using mdbox, multiple

Big raid isn't great as bricks. If the array does fail, the larger brick means much longer heal times. My main question I ask when evaluating storage solutions is, "what happens when it fails?" With ceph, if the placement database is corrupted, all your data is lost (happened to my employer, once, losing 5PB of customer data). With Gluster, it's just files on disks, easily

Hi, I came across the 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_LMASTER=no' and 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_RECMASTER=no' options in my quest to salvage a rather poorly performing CTDB cluster over Ceph(fs). Unfortunately, the docs provide not enough information for a clustering noop like myself. Would there be any benefit to disabling those options for a branch office node on a high-latency WAN connection?

Hi list, we have migrated a single node Samba server from Ubuntu Trusty to a 3-node CTDB Cluster on Debian Bullseye with Sernet packages. Storage is CephFS. We are running Samba in Standalone Mode with LDAP Backend. Samba Version: sernet-samba 99:4.18.2-2debian11 I don't know if it is relevant here's how we have mounted CephFS on the samba nodes: (fstab):/samba /srv/samba ceph

Hi ceph-ers, The email below was posted on the ceph mailinglist yesterday by Wido den Hollander. I guess this could be interesting for user here as well. MJ -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [ceph-users] librmb: Mail storage on RADOS with Dovecot Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:40:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Wido den Hollander <wido at 42on.com> To: ceph-users at ceph.com Hi, A tracker