similar to: samba4 schema for openldap

On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: > On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >> about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap performance >> is not enough for me. Now I want to try a server in the middle with >> openldap pcache - ldap cache proxy function. But

On 16/12/15 20:40, Таболин Юрий wrote: > 16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: >> On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >>>> about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Таболин Юрий <tabolin at speechpro.com> wrote: > 16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: > >> On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >> >>> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and about

17.12.2015 0:27, Rowland penny пишет: > On 16/12/15 20:40, Таболин Юрий wrote: >> 16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: >>> On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >>>> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>>>> Hi all. >>>>> >>>>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >>>>>

16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: > On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >>> about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap performance >>> is not enough for me. Now I want to try a server in the

Assuming the DNS for the site is setup correctly, the srv records should be evenly spreading the load among the servers on the site that the client is on. With Windows based domain the answer to this question is either fix your ldap client to use the SRV records and not use only the DC with the PDC Emulator role, or add more DCs to the site. I would assume the answer is the same for a Samba

ah yes.. that are the "limitation", but know limitations ( for us ) Rowland, this is something to add on the wiki. (here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration ) ;-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Yuriy Tabolin >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus 2015 11:35 >Aan: samba at

Thanks for answer. I am very sad to see that. I had examined samba behavior with tracer and had seen too many poll, fcntl and stat system calls by samba task[ldapsrv] process Elapsed Times for PID 1423, SYSCALL TIME (ns) dup 2653 flock 5811 lseek 33513 geteuid 42747

Hello, we use samba with ldap backend. All is working well. Now the user count should grow to about 3000 users in a mixed environment with PCs and terminal servers. So the most of the users typically have (more than one) sessions to different terminal servers. The smb version is (tragically) still v1 and a lot of the clients comes over a NAT gateway. To reduce the traffic to the remote ldap

Hi all. I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and about 350 PC on domain. DCs have 3 CPU and 3GB RAM. Some servers with services like apache, exim, dovecot, etc use samba4 ldap (port 389) for user authentication. Some times ago after adding some services to use ldap I found, that samba4 cannot serve all ldap requests. Every 10-30 minutes I see in DCs logs: dc1 kernel:

On the Samba wiki at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Internal_DNS there is the following: If you have chosen the internal DNS as backend for your environment, there are only two options that can be added to your smb.conf, to control the behaviour of DNS at this point: # Don't allow any updates | allow unsigned updates | only allow signed updates allow dns updates = False |

25.11.2015 10:21, Andrew Bartlett пишет: > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 16:50 +0300, Yuriy Tabolin wrote: >> Hi all. >> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >> about >> 350 PC on domain. DCs have 3 CPU and 3GB RAM. Some servers with >> services >> like apache, exim, dovecot, etc use samba4 ldap (port 389) for user >>

On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 17:48 +0300, Yuriy Tabolin wrote: > Thanks for answer. I am very sad to see that. > I had examined samba behavior with tracer and had seen too many poll, > fcntl and stat system calls by samba task[ldapsrv] process > > Elapsed Times for PID 1423, > > SYSCALL TIME (ns) > dup 2653 > flock

typo in : Conditional forwarders are implemented yet. The same error message as above is returned. change Conditional forwarders are not implemented yet. The same error message as above is returned. :-) good work :-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus

Hi, All. In official samba wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Installing_RSAT_on_Windows_for_AD_Management#Installation Feature explanation: Active Directory Module for Windows PowerShell: Administrating AD via PowerShell I thought I can manage samba4 domain with powershell, but I can't. I see error "Unable to find a default server with active directory web services running"

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 1:49?PM Johnnie W Adams <jxadams at ualr.edu> wrote: >> >> Hi, folks, >> >> We're experiencing an odd ten-second delay intermittently when logging >> into any of our Linux boxes which authenticate against LDAP. Here's where >> it happens: >> >> Jul 13 11:54:23 console2

On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 16:50 +0300, Yuriy Tabolin wrote: > Hi all. > I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and > about > 350 PC on domain. DCs have 3 CPU and 3GB RAM. Some servers with > services > like apache, exim, dovecot, etc use samba4 ldap (port 389) for user > authentication. Some times ago after adding some services to use ldap > I >

Hi All. Trying to use the file /samba-3.0.6/examples/LDAP/samba.schema I found that it has duplicate entries for atributetype > grep 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.2.1.50 /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/* /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema.new:attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165 .2.1.50 NAME 'sambaLogonHours' /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema.new:attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For those using Samba with OpenLDAP: I've posted and updated schema file for use with OpenLDAP 2.x at http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.6/samba.schema This file should replace the patch I posted earlier today. Sorry for the confusion. cheers, jerry - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Alleviating the

I'm in the process of upgrading OpenLDAP from 2.0 to 2.2 and many Samba servers from 2.2 to 3.0 over the course of several weeks. I have a test setup using Samba 3 against OpenLDAP 2.2 with the Samba 3 schema. I would like to be able to point all my existing Samba 2.2 servers at the new directory while they wait their turn to be upgraded. I see that Samba 2.2 allows me to specify an