similar to: Winbindd on 4.2+ full functionality?

On 13/12/15 05:07, George wrote: > Hi, > > I recently upgraded from 4.1.17 to 4.3.1. > > I thought that the winbindd daemon for AD included since 4.2 would allow > proper and complete winbind operation as in member servers, but that > doesn't seem to be the case. > > In particular, I want consistent UIDs on DCs for files created within > Windows (so I can avoid

Hi, On 8 November 2015 at 10:49, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: > This is how it works in rsync: [...] > I have always used rsync to replicate the sysvol. > And always used local xids. But being mainly a > file-server guy, I have also not managed many Samba > AD/DC environments. So I am really more than willing > to learn from others' experience here. This

On 15:27:22 wrote Rowland Penny: > On 08/11/15 11:08, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 8 November 2015 at 10:49, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: > >> This is how it works in rsync: > > [...] > > > >> I have always used rsync to replicate the sysvol. > >> And always used local xids. But being mainly a >

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:09:47 +0000 Jonathan Hunter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > Trying to avoid making this into a "Me too" response :) but this is > the single largest issue I have with Samba at the moment, I've > struggled with this for literally years, both before I switched to > rfc2307 (which did help in many areas) and

On 08/11/15 10:49, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2015-11-08 at 09:29 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 07/11/15 23:28, Michael Adam wrote: >>> rsync will work if not using --numeric-ids. >> OK, I know that logins will work on all the samba machines, but I am not >> sure what you say about rsync is correct, this is what 'man rsync' has to >> say about

On 07/11/15 23:28, Michael Adam wrote: > rsync will work if not using --numeric-ids. OK, I know that logins will work on all the samba machines, but I am not sure what you say about rsync is correct, this is what 'man rsync' has to say about '--numeric-ids': --numeric-ids don't map uid/gid values by user/group name So by my reading, if you don't use it,

On 08/11/15 11:53, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2015-11-08 at 11:14 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 08/11/15 10:49, Michael Adam wrote: >>> On 2015-11-08 at 09:29 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 07/11/15 23:28, Michael Adam wrote: >>>>> rsync will work if not using --numeric-ids. >>>> OK, I know that logins will work on all the samba

On 1/13/2017 3:30 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:20:52 -0500 > Bob Thomas <bthomas at cybernetics.com> wrote: > >> On 1/13/2017 1:45 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:30:14 -0500 >>> Bob Thomas <bthomas at cybernetics.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Rowland, >>>>>> Thank you for the quick

On 1/13/2017 4:58 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:43:39 -0500 > Bob Thomas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 1/13/2017 3:30 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:20:52 -0500 >>> Bob Thomas <bthomas at cybernetics.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/13/2017 1:45 PM, Rowland

On 14/06/16 17:00, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Correcting previous email > > > Hello! > Own two Dcs Samba 4.4, this all OK, but ids are different: > > > Example DC1: > id tr005 > uid = 3000039 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005) gid = 100 (users) groups = 100 > (users), 3000039 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005), 3,000,009 (BUILTIN \ users) > > Example DC2: > id tr005 > uid =

The same happens to me on Debian 7 with the included Samba 4.1.17. Although relates to Ubuntu, this is the same issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1357471 I can tell you that what triggers this are network connectivity issues between the DCs, even if they last a couple of seconds. Once the connectivity is restored, the replication stays broken unless Samba is restarted.

Hi Le 09/06/2016 à 20:42, Rowland penny a écrit : > On 08/06/16 15:34, mathias dufresne wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> [snip] >> And we get issue with Linux ACLs: they are not the same because some >> BUILTIN users and/or groups do not have same id mapping on all DC. >> >> How to force all DC to get same id mapping? >> >> Using

On 13/06/15 11:00, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > On 13 June 2015 at 09:34, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 12 June 2015 at 08:55, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Sadly, even though sssd is now running and I'm no longer reliant on >>> winbind, the rest of samba doesn't seem to be taking notice of these >>>

On 10/4/2016 11:22 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > See inline comments: > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:44:07 -0400 > Bob Thomas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hey Samba team - Thanks for all your work >> >> I have three production samba 4 DCs 2 running on Ubuntu 16.04 (Samba >> 4.4.5 and 4.4.4) and one on 14.04 (Samba 4.3.3) all

Hi everyone The s4 Domain Users group has xidNumber: 100 and the Linux users group has gidNumber=100. I've been mapping xidNumber <--> gidNumber for s4 posix groups I've added myself, but this causes a name collision for Domain Users. This also has implications on Linux as local users have access to the group owned stuff of Domain users. I've changed the xidNumber in

Am 25.06.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Achim Gottinger: > > > Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 24.06.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 24/06/16 21:35, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>>> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at

Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com >>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com >>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>>:

Dear all, ist there any howto updating 2 samba4.1.17 Dcs/production/replicating (Cetos6 /bind_dlz) to samba 4.3.1? What steps are important to succeed? Or is Samba 4.3.1 not ready for production? Greetings Daniel

On 26/06/16 12:43, Achim Gottinger wrote: > Created an feature request > > "add resolving for well known security principals" > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11997 > > Am 25.06.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 25.06.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >>> >>> >>> Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16

Hello I had a problem with different group IDs on my two DCs. They have both Version 4.7.6-Ubuntu and use the RFC2307 scheme. The first DC showed the group-IDs 200xx that I gave in the AD. The second DC gave the ID 100 to Domain Users and other 200xx IDs to the groups. To could solve the problem: ?1. I gave Unix UIDs to all users and GIDs to groups in the Active Directory with RSAT ?2. I