similar to: Internal DNS and recursion

ah yes.. that are the "limitation", but know limitations ( for us ) Rowland, this is something to add on the wiki. (here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration ) ;-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Yuriy Tabolin >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus 2015 11:35 >Aan: samba at

typo in : Conditional forwarders are implemented yet. The same error message as above is returned. change Conditional forwarders are not implemented yet. The same error message as above is returned. :-) good work :-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus

>> While on the subject of internal DNS, why do most functions not work >> when using the RSAT DNS management tool? Is this situation likely to >> improve in the near future? We could of course use external Bind, >> which would allow us to use the existing scripts and commands that >> we're used to, but that breaks the use of AD tools. > >No idea about

On 19/08/15 01:57, John Gardeniers wrote: > On the Samba wiki at > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Internal_DNS there is the > following: > > If you have chosen the internal DNS as backend for your environment, > there are only two options that can be added to your smb.conf, to > control the behaviour of DNS at this point: > > # Don't allow any updates |

Thanks for answer. I am very sad to see that. I had examined samba behavior with tracer and had seen too many poll, fcntl and stat system calls by samba task[ldapsrv] process Elapsed Times for PID 1423, SYSCALL TIME (ns) dup 2653 flock 5811 lseek 33513 geteuid 42747

Hi all. I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and about 350 PC on domain. DCs have 3 CPU and 3GB RAM. Some servers with services like apache, exim, dovecot, etc use samba4 ldap (port 389) for user authentication. Some times ago after adding some services to use ldap I found, that samba4 cannot serve all ldap requests. Every 10-30 minutes I see in DCs logs: dc1 kernel:

On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: > On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >> about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap performance >> is not enough for me. Now I want to try a server in the middle with >> openldap pcache - ldap cache proxy function. But

25.11.2015 10:21, Andrew Bartlett пишет: > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 16:50 +0300, Yuriy Tabolin wrote: >> Hi all. >> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >> about >> 350 PC on domain. DCs have 3 CPU and 3GB RAM. Some servers with >> services >> like apache, exim, dovecot, etc use samba4 ldap (port 389) for user >>

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Таболин Юрий <tabolin at speechpro.com> wrote: > 16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: > >> On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >> >>> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and about

Hi all. I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap performance is not enough for me. Now I want to try a server in the middle with openldap pcache - ldap cache proxy function. But it only works with appropriate openldap schema. Where I can find samba4 openldap schema? I'm going to cache simple queries such as

Hi Robert, It doesn't break compatibility with MS, unless you're talking about the RSAT DNS tool, which is a lot more cumbersome than a text editor anyway and it's pretty much assumed that if you're using Samba you're a Linux sysadmin, so not being able to use the RSAT DNS tool should not be a problem. I haven't read Mark Andrew's comment, not being on the Bind

On 16/12/15 20:40, Таболин Юрий wrote: > 16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: >> On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >>>> about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap

Hi there, I build a samba 4.0.11 on a Debian Wheezy from source, joined a existing AD (samba works with internal dns) and have this smb.conf: ======= # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DOMAIN realm = DOMAIN.local netbios name = SAMBA1 server role = active directory domain controller allow dns updates = nonsecure dns recursive queries = yes

Hi, I have uploaded error images on following URL. Please check and guide me. M stuck on my live env. https://postimg.cc/image/5srwk7tud/ https://postimg.cc/image/oxv5tzg85/ I have my Samba on Ubuntu 14, and accessing it through RSAT. On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:26 PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:33:36 +0530 > Vivek Patil via

Is there any chance that support for Bind flat files will return? I understand the various (extremely weak) arguments against it but DLZ not only sucks big time, it limits proper functionality and inter-operability, necessitating significant design changes for anything but the simplest of networks. Additionally, it doesn't work with the existing scripts many people use. I know that

/usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] netbios name = UBUNTU realm = MYDOMAIN.IO workgroup = MYDOMAIN dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 allow dns updates = nonsecure and secure server role = active directory domain controller [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.io/scripts read only = No [sysvol]

Good morning! First of all thanks Rowland for the fast answer yesterday! I realized that samba-technical might have been the wrong mailing list and switched it to the normal samba users list (hopefully it worked, as it does get a bit confusing with spamgourmets sendto addresses!). Unfortunately the problem with samba_dnsupdate remains after the changes. I did changed the smb.conf, krb5.conf, and

First, I am sorry. I should know this by now. Last week had an issue with W7 client could not update. I made some adjustments to get W7 updated. Now I am having an issue with update resolution. (Run apt-get update and repositories cannot be find, etc.) So, this tells me that I have messed up my dns resolution. All clients (W7 & linux) point to my DC for DNS nameserver. All clients (W7

Hi, All. In official samba wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Installing_RSAT_on_Windows_for_AD_Management#Installation Feature explanation: Active Directory Module for Windows PowerShell: Administrating AD via PowerShell I thought I can manage samba4 domain with powershell, but I can't. I see error "Unable to find a default server with active directory web services running"

I am having problems getting dns to function correctly with Ubuntu 14.04LTS. My /etc/hosts file is: 127.0.0.1 localhost # Need to keep 127.0.1.1 entry or DNS fails 127.0.1.1 mysrvr03.mycomapny.biz wdnsrvr03 192.168.16.208 mysrvr03.mycompany.biz wdnsrvr03 # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2