similar to: ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer

On 10/08/15 20:51, Andrew Martin wrote: > I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the > "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: > [myshare] > path = /srv/myshare > browseable = no > public = no > guest ok = no > writable = yes > printable = no > create mode = 0660 >

----- Original Message ----- > From: "buhorojo" <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:54:23 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > On 10/08/15 21:51, Andrew Martin wrote: > > > > Has anyone encountered this problem, or do you know what

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:46:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > >> > > Hi Rowland, > > > > This Samba 3 server is joined to a Samba 4 AD domain

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:19:09 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > Hi, is the share stored on a standalone server or an AD member server or > what ? > > Not that

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

I have an issue with samba+acl and Windows checkbox "Replace all Child object permissions" . I have a folder with defaults ACLs : /default:user:user1:rwx, default:user:user2:rwx owned by user1/ On Windows if I'm checking "Replace all Child object permissions with inheritable permissions from this object" on this folder, it losts the default ACL

woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway. and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755) but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only users = " or something like that? Am 13.12.2011 17:56, schrieb Raffael Sahli: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, "skull"<skull17 at gmx.ch> wrote: >> I want to

On btrfs, do the following ------------------ # su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we

I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users. for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users. and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1 and grant read only permissions to user2 and user3 how do i do this? any links or direct tips on that? my suggestion would be something like this, but as you can imagine it didn't work: # The general datapool

I will probably file a bug about this, but perhaps someone here will have some ideas. We have a problem with files being deleted instead of being saved when making changes in Microsoft Excel. The log shows an error of: 'Lock order violation'. This is with Samba 4.1.6 and happens on both Linux (2.6.25-14.fc9.i686) and Solaris 10. No such problem when running Samba 3.6.22. We have a setup

Hello, I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment. I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47. Below my configurations files: #/etc/fstab /dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1 #smb.conf [data] comment = files path = /shared inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes map acl inherit = Yes #

Hello,   I installed a samba server v 4.6.6, I use samba in classic mode (in /etc/default/sernet-samba). Samba is a member of a Windows server 2003 R2 domain.   Here is my smb.conf :   [global] use sendfile = no gpfs:getrealfilename = no smb ports = 445 139 dos charset = 850 unix charset = UTF-8 interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = true workgroup = MYREALM passdb backend =

Hi, a more specific subject... -| -----Original Message----- -| From: -| samba-bounces+dirk.laurenz=fujitsu-siemens.com@lists.samba.o -| rg -| [mailto:samba-bounces+dirk.laurenz=fujitsu-siemens.com@lists -| .samba.org] On Behalf Of Laurenz, Dirk -| Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:48 PM -| To: samba@lists.samba.org -| Subject: [Samba] Problem with 3.0.7 -| -| Hello everybody,

On 13/06/15 16:33, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Hi buhorojo, > > I *think* I have a stable system for the moment... so thank you :-) > > On 13 June 2015 at 12:50, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I now set in smb.conf: >>> >>> server services = -dns +winbind -winbindd >>> >>> I stopped samba, then removed

Setup: Samba AD DC and Samba AD Member Server, Win10 clients only. Samba version 4.8.1 Has something changed recently in the way ACL's are supposed to work? My existing shares work just fine but any ALC changes I make using Windows are ignored in Samba. For example, I'm creating a new folder in Windows inside an existing share and I add user User1 or group Group1 in the security tab.

Hello, I've been setting up new file server using samba 4.8.3 (centos 7 RPM), as samba 4 AD member server using my earlier smb.conf when I realised that I was  previously somewhat circumventing the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege by using "admin users map" to SAMDOM\Domain admins" parameter in smb.conf. I decided to change my smb.conf and setup shares following samba wiki. All

Hi Guys! A simple question.. I never worked with ACL's and since my costumer want some access levels for some sub-foldes in shares, I am reading some manuals about that.. But.. Before apply some testings, I need some advices about this.. Here is my question... Parent folder (share): FOLDER Sub-folder1: PROJETC1 Sub-folder2: PROJECT2 User1: DIRECTOR Group: Director/Projects User2: Employee1

Hi Here is my environment: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.7 (Tikanga) postfix-2.9.1-1.rhel5 dovecot 1.0.7 I want to config a complete postfix-dovecot mail server. First I configured postfix to use procmail, its default LDA and dovecot for pop3 and imap. I didn't changed main.cf a lot, just myhostname and a few other properties. I didn't set home_mailbox. About dovecot.conf

On 25/10/2024 14:03, Havany via samba wrote: > Did you try 133 mask instead of 0133 ? > > We use to disable acl for this kind of share and do something like that : > > [share] > path = /a/share/path > create mask = 133 > directory mask = 022 > valid users = @agroup > write list = @sagroup > force group = @agroup > nt acl support = No Still no go: It's rwx

You are right ! But it's possible to create a root kerberos principal like here : http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-4557/fgohx/ But I can't get this work with a samba kerberos realm.... 2015-10-09 22:32 GMT+02:00 buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com>: > On 09/10/15 08:59, Prunk Dump wrote: >> >> >> -> on the server >> $ ls -al