similar to: Active Directory group membership changes not reflected in winbind information

Hi Volker, thank you for your answer. What do you mean? Restarting winbind? Kind regards, Martin > Martin Markert Systems Integrator Tuerkenstr. 89, 80799 M?nchen / Germany Phone +49 89 3809-1848 EMail MMarkert at arri.de Visit us on Facebook!Am 08.06.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE>: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:46:33AM +0000,

Hi, I've successfully configure idmap_rid to read id mappings from our AD servers: winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes winbind nested groups = Yes winbind separator = + winbind offline logon = false idmap config *:backend = rid idmap config *:range = 50000-99999 idmap config

Am 27.02.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> : > On 27/02/15 14:04, Markert, Martin wrote: >> Hi, >> I've successfully configure idmap_rid to read id mappings from our AD servers: >> >> winbind enum users = Yes >> winbind enum groups = Yes >> winbind use default domain = Yes >>

Am 27.02.2015 um 15:48 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> : > On 27/02/15 14:28, Markert, Martin wrote: >> Am 27.02.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> >> : >> >>> On 27/02/15 14:04, Markert, Martin wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> I've successfully configure idmap_rid to read id

Am 27.02.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 27/02/15 14:59, Markert, Martin wrote: >> Am 27.02.2015 um 15:48 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> >> : >> >>> On 27/02/15 14:28, Markert, Martin wrote: >>>> Am 27.02.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at

On 27/02/15 14:04, Markert, Martin wrote: > Hi, > I've successfully configure idmap_rid to read id mappings from our AD servers: > > winbind enum users = Yes > winbind enum groups = Yes > winbind use default domain = Yes > winbind nested groups = Yes > winbind separator = + > winbind offline logon = false >

On 27/02/15 14:28, Markert, Martin wrote: > Am 27.02.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > : > >> On 27/02/15 14:04, Markert, Martin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I've successfully configure idmap_rid to read id mappings from our AD servers: >>> >>> winbind enum users = Yes >>> winbind

Hi, I've successfully configure idmap_rid to read id mappings from our AD servers: winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes winbind nested groups = Yes winbind separator = + winbind offline logon = false idmap config *:backend = rid idmap config *:range = 50000-99999 idmap config

On 27/02/15 14:59, Markert, Martin wrote: > Am 27.02.2015 um 15:48 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > : > >> On 27/02/15 14:28, Markert, Martin wrote: >>> Am 27.02.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> >>> : >>> >>>> On 27/02/15 14:04, Markert, Martin wrote: >>>>>

Hi, I've successfully joined a CentOS server to our AD domain: AD: Windows Server 2008 RC2 with Windows Services for UNIX AD member: CentOS 6.6, sernet-samba-4.1.14-9, authentication via Kerberos and Winbind >From time to time the following entries show up in the messages file: Apr 2 11:54:15 barbarella nss_wins[4254]: [2015/04/02 11:54:15.339983, 0]

Hi, we have network performance issues with Samba (Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6) on one of our servers. The maximum throughput from client to server is 110 MB/s (read/write) under Windows 7 x64 (single 10GE NIC). When using NFS on a different Linux workstation we're getting much higher rates, around 500-700 MB/s. I still can't find the problem. Setup server: CentOS 6.6 Samba 4.7.2

On Saturday, 25 July 2020, 23:36:33 CEST, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 08:37 +0200, Christian Eggers wrote: > > ... > > libkeyutils usually invokes syscall() directly. As syscall() is not > > provided by klibc, libkeyutils has to be slightly modified for using the > > klibc wrappers. > > Wouldn't it be more useful for klibc to implement

On 03/02/16 03:27 PM, Martin Markert wrote: > Hi, > we have network performance issues with Samba (Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6) on one of our servers. The maximum throughput from client to server is 110 MB/s (read/write) under Windows 7 x64 (single 10GE NIC). When using NFS on a different Linux workstation we're getting much higher rates, around 500-700 MB/s. I still can't

Hi. Try add this to your config in global section. socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=262140 SO_SNDBUF=262140 max xmit = 262140 stat cache = yes max stat cache size = 262140 server max protocol = SMB2_10 server min protocol = NT1 client min protocol = NT1 client max protocol = SMB2_10 getwd cache = yes read raw = yes write raw = yes level2 oplocks = yes locking =

libkeyutils is used by the keyctl command which is required for loading keys into the kernel (e.g. for mounting an authenticated UBIFS as root file system). libkeyutils usually invokes syscall() directly. As syscall() is not provided by klibc, libkeyutils has to be slightly modified for using the klibc wrappers. Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers at arri.de> ---

Hi, we have a winbind issue with Samba (Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6) on one of our servers. After a while (once a day) one of the winbind daemons causes a very high cpu load (100%). This load remains until we kill this process. This server is a member of a AD domain with several trusted domains. I think this happens because winbind has problems with one of the trusted domains (ALS2)

Am 2016-06-09 18:16, schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:11:15PM +0200, Martin Markert wrote: >> Hi, >> when saving a file to this share the permissions (0777) are being >> ignored under OS X 10.11.5. All files will get these permissions: >> 0755. I don't know why? > > Remember, "force XXX mode" only applies to file/directory >

Hi, when saving a file to this share the permissions (0777) are being ignored under OS X 10.11.5. All files will get these permissions: 0755. I don't know why? Samaba Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6 CentOS release 6.7 [global] workgroup = BAVARIA server string = Samba Server %m netbios name = NASBAV1 log file = /var/log/samba/%m_%a_%R.log

On July 27, 2020 2:43:36 AM PDT, Christian Eggers <ceggers at arri.de> wrote: >On Saturday, 25 July 2020, 23:36:33 CEST, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 08:37 +0200, Christian Eggers wrote: >> > ... >> > libkeyutils usually invokes syscall() directly. As syscall() is not >> > provided by klibc, libkeyutils has to be slightly modified for

On 2020-07-27 19:20, hpa at zytor.com wrote: > > I'm not so sure they have dealt with it in the sense of having it work on all architectures. *Most* of the problems are related to the shifting the arguments by one, which can cause a bunch of problems, especially if it means the arguments spill to memory. However, I have absolutely no idea how to correctly implement syscall(3) on s390