similar to: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction

On 11/05/15 18:56, bar?? tombul wrote: > What is your opinion about the cause and solution I thought I gave you the cause, your clients are trying to update their own dns records, they are denied and then the system you have set up to update dns carries out the update. The solution, stop the clients trying to update their own records, your clients are probably windows and if so, it is a

El 10/10/19 a les 21:07, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> > It works in a similar way to how I update dns records and I have similar > records in AD and they replicate. Oh, but they do. Until the replication chokes on those deleted records. Never happened until September 25 (though I realized only today when a manually added host resolved erratically). > > Can you post

*Philippe MALADJIAN Responsable informatique | administrateur système* Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> Le 03/10/2018 à 16:33, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:01:33 +0200 > Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, I realize the preparation of

*Philippe MALADJIAN Responsable informatique | administrateur système* Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> Le 03/10/2018 à 17:29, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:54:02 +0200 > Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> *Philippe MALADJIAN >>

Does Samba implement Microsoft's reserved WINS name capability? From: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934864 ================================== To register a reserved name record in WINS, you must register both the name and the qualified name. (A qualified name is a name that is followed by a period (.) character.) For example, to register the reserved "WPAD" name record in WINS,

All (and hpa in particular), I know that the question in the subject line of this message may come across as a bit silly, given that PXElinux is not a DHCP server, but hear me out... Those of you who have been working on PXE-booting Windows PE instances or the new Windows installer images that make use of the Windows Boot Manager and ".wim" files may have come across the general

hello, samba is setup PDC with ldap client : windows xp pro sp2 server : samba 3.0.20 + openldap 2.2 + squid 2.5stable14 + squidGuard is it possible to create an automatic logon with internet explorer ? perhaps with ntlm_auth, but i can't find the good sentence. thanks.

Hi, I've noticed that Windows Updates, just won't do NTLM auth, so i've just added a no_auth exception for windows update sites. How many children are you starting. I'm serving +700 users with just one squid with 30 ntlm_auth processes on a PII/800 MHZ/256 MB Ram with no problems wathsoever. Best Regards, Bruno Guerreiro >-----Original Message----- >From: Vitaly Protsko

On 10/10/2019 20:35, Luca Olivetti via samba wrote: > El 10/10/19 a les 21:07, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: > >>> >> It works in a similar way to how I update dns records and I have >> similar records in AD and they replicate. > > Oh, but they do. Until the replication chokes on those deleted records. I think you misunderstood what I tried to say, I have the

Everyone, I have set up squid as a proxy http server in order to filter web access for an office that wants to block certain web sites. Is there a way to use the dhcpd server to assign the squid server and port number 3128 to each Linux desktop when they boot using the existing dhcpd server. Or do I need to change each user's network preference setup in firefox. The dhcpd server and

El 10/10/19 a les 20:41, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> It turns out that dc2 chokes on "\0ADEL" dns records, supposedly >> deleted objects. > > What you have there is known as a tombstone record and Samba has a tool > to remove them: > > samba-tool domain tombstones expunge NC > --tombstone-lifetime=TOMBSTONE_LIFETIME > > Where

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:54:02 +0200 Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > *Philippe MALADJIAN > Responsable informatique | administrateur système* > Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr > <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> > > > > > Le 03/10/2018 à 16:33, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : >

Hello, I realize the preparation of the migration from samba 3 to samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the same DNS domain name. With the migration the domain dns becomes "dom" and according to my first researches I will quickly

On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 11:22 +0200, Philippe Maladjian via samba wrote: > *Philippe MALADJIAN > Responsable informatique | administrateur système* > Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr > <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> > > > > > Le 03/10/2018 à 17:29, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:54:02 +0200

I know this is samba list and I am hoping that someone with MS AD experience can answer this definitively. Does AD have some kind of data exchange between dhcp and dns so that systems which receive a dhcp lease from an AD DC more reliably register their hostname with AD DNS? Looking at the RFC I couldn't see any reason why this should be the case. But it seems that host name registration for

*Philippe MALADJIAN Responsable informatique | administrateur système* Le 10/10/2018 à 08:30, Andrew Bartlett via samba a écrit : > On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 11:22 +0200, Philippe Maladjian via samba wrote: >> *Philippe MALADJIAN >> Responsable informatique | administrateur système* >> Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr >>

Was wondering if it's possible to assign specific users a proxy server for web browsing. My current setup is openldap, samba pdc and a squid proxy server. Our call center uses the web alot and I'd like to have them use the proxy. The agents don't usually login to the same windows machine. Is this possible via samba or netlogon? I'd hate to have to edit the group policies on 50

Hi Ken, > I am considering which DNS implementation and cannot determine > exactly when someone should use the Bind9 manner with BIND9_DLZ > Module. > > For my purposes, I will have AD and non-AD nodes on the network > using either DHCP or static IP addresses. Some will be Windows & > Linux clients joined on the Samba AD domain for logins. Some will be > Windows &

The only thing related to 'addresses' in my /etc/samba/smb.conf file is a "hosts allow": hosts allow = 192.168.3.0/24 127.1 I'm going to ignore the 'local hosts case, as if I solve the other, the localhost case may get solved by inference. I thought the 'hosts allow' would allow any host on the local 192.168.3.0/24 subnet. The hosts have no problems

I am considering which DNS implementation and cannot determine exactly when someone should use the Bind9 manner with BIND9_DLZ Module. For my purposes, I will have AD and non-AD nodes on the network using either DHCP or static IP addresses. Some will be Windows & Linux clients joined on the Samba AD domain for logins. Some will be Windows & Linux clients that are standalone using