similar to: rid mapping works on member server but not DC

On 12/04/15 11:55, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Hi, > > I have been struggling with this for a few days and think that now's > the time I can ask for help :) It's not an area I have delved into > before, so I have been trying to follow the documentation, do my own > research, and do as much configuration/testing as I can myself; but I > am now confused. (I am running 4.2.0

Thank you Rowland, that clearly explains why it isn't working for me. Appreciated. I was trying to achieve my goal of having two domain controllers for redundancy, without having additional physical machines - it looks like I'm now in the same boat as the other current thread ("Domain controller in a chroot"), which is unfortunate! :( My scenario is that I have one ESXi

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

Hello colleagues, After upgrading Debian 8 to the latest version 9 (stretch). Command wbinfo --group-info LOCAL\\db_g - doesn't return list of all users inside the group, I have only: LOCAL\db_g:x:1000: and before it was: LOCAL\db_g:x:1000:user1, user2, user3, user4, ........ smb.conf: ---------------------------------------------------------- # Global parameters [global] realm =

On 13/06/15 16:33, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Hi buhorojo, > > I *think* I have a stable system for the moment... so thank you :-) > > On 13 June 2015 at 12:50, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I now set in smb.conf: >>> >>> server services = -dns +winbind -winbindd >>> >>> I stopped samba, then removed

Hi, I want to use Dovecot LDA (or rather LMTP) use as local deliver with Postfix MTA. Users are in LDAP DB with structure as: dn: cn=username, ou=rank, o=myorg cn: username objectClass: Person gidNumber: uNNN uidNumber: gNNN userPassword: (somehow hashed, can only bind verification) homeDirectory: /Home/$rank/$username mailActive: 0/1 mail: usera at OneDomain mail: userb at

On 13/06/15 11:00, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > On 13 June 2015 at 09:34, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 12 June 2015 at 08:55, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Sadly, even though sssd is now running and I'm no longer reliant on >>> winbind, the rest of samba doesn't seem to be taking notice of these >>>

I have samba-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64 which is connected to WIndows Active Directory Server. I configured samba with AD as below: [global] workgroup = MYDOMAIN realm = MYDOMAIN.COM prefered master = No server string = servername security = ADS encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/%I max log size = 50 interfaces = bond0 lo bind interfaces only =

Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed user names: drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user   4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7       

Hi, Is this expected or not? From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> ? a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com"))

Hello, I have logging information for multiple machines, which I am trying to summarize and graph. So far, I process each host individually, but I would like to summarize the user count across multiple hosts. I want to answer the question "how many unique users logged in on a certain day across a group of machines"? I'm not quite sure how to scale the data frame and analysis to

PBX: Asterisk 1.4 Phones: PSTN phone connected to TDM400 X-Ten Lite Polycom 430 Scenario Polycom 430 = User1 User2 calls User1(Polycom 430) asks to be transfered to User3 User1 does an attended transfer using the trnsfr button on the polycom User2 is placed in music-on-hold User3s phone rings. (So far so good Right?) User3 picks up the phone to answer User2 only to

I have a dataset like this (dput for this below) which represents user computer sessions: username machine start end 1 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:44:18 2011-01-03 09:47:27 2 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:46:29 2011-01-03 10:09:16 3 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 14:07:36 2011-01-03 14:56:17 4 user1 D5599.domain.com

hey list, we are currently migrating our users from novell to samba. now we have one problem: in novell we could give e.g. user1 access to users2 home share so he could modify, delete or add files on this share. in samba we defined a global homes share that is mapped on logon. so how can we give user1 the needed rights? here is the definition of the homes share in smb.conf: [homes]

Hi all, I do have a mailbox-quota problem in dovecot 2.0.19 that is beond my understanding. Could someone pls. give me a hint. - user1 max. mailbox quota is set to 1GB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 15MB - user2 max. mailbox quota is set to 10MB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 10kB - user1 shares the folder 'shared_folder' to user2 with all rights (read, write ...) -

Basically, what I typed was: chown -R user2:user2 * chown -R user2:user2 .* chown -R user2:user2 *.* ...all in /home. Duh. I forgot which way recursive went. So, I then did: chown -R root:root * chown -R root:root .* chown -R root:root *.* ...this time in / to try and f things. Duh again. Other items need to have other owners & groups. So, how can I fix this? In MacOSX, there is a utility

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

Hey list, I have a problem when I host 2 SIP-accounts on the same Asterisk-server. Asterisk picks out the SIP-account on alphabetic order A --> Z. In my sip.conf : register => user1:passwd1 at server/user1 register => user2:passwd2 at server/user2 [YOCAN-3starsnet] type=peer host=server username=user1 secret=passwd1 fromuser=user1 accountcode=user1_in [ITCENTER-3starsnet] type=peer

On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 09:59, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote: > On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi <tachibana at qualitia.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is this expected or not? >> >> From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> >> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> >>

Hello I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work: Users can choose extensions 1-4 or 9 to tell why they're calling, and I'll send an e-mail to the person(s) to whom is involved. Extension 4 is actually for personal messages for User1, and extension 9 is for everyone (User1, User2, and User3). => For some reason, when the caller chooses extension 4, both User1 and User2