Hi,
Is this expected or not?
From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com>
To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com>
?
a uid fetch 43055 (envelope)
* 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900"
"test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com"))
((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL
"user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user2"
"hoge.example.com")) NIL NIL NIL
"<WLXvFmpAZFNeQbPPITjRwimDyamnBm1 at test>"))
From: "user1 at fuga.example.com" <user1 at example.com>
To: "user2 at hoge.example.com" <user2 at example.com>
?
a uid fetch 43056 (envelope)
* 1861 FETCH (UID 43056 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:53:59 +0900"
"test1" (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL "user1"
"example.com")) (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL
"user1" "example.com")) (("user1 at
fuga.example.com" NIL "user1" "example.com"))
(("user2 at hoge.example.com" NIL "user2"
"example.com")) NIL NIL NIL "<WLXvFmpAZFNeQbPPITjRwimDyamnBm2
at test>"))
Regards,
--
TACHIBANA Masashi QUALITIA CO., LTD.
mailto:tachibana at qualitia.co.jp
??????????
https://www.qualitia.co.jp/
On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi <tachibana at qualitia.co.jp> wrote:> > Hi, > > Is this expected or not? > > From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> > To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> > ? > a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) > * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user2" "hoge.example.com")) NIL NIL NIL "<WLXvFmpAZFNeQbPPITjRwimDyamnBm1 at test>"))This is an invalid email address, so it's neither correct nor incorrect to have this output. But this reminded me that I was going to discuss about this with other IETF people. Lets see what others think: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/sqRTdsV_DGBhHu2ghdCDFo_pM8Q/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/sqRTdsV_DGBhHu2ghdCDFo_pM8Q/>> From: "user1 at fuga.example.com" <user1 at example.com> > To: "user2 at hoge.example.com" <user2 at example.com> > ? > a uid fetch 43056 (envelope) > * 1861 FETCH (UID 43056 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:53:59 +0900" "test1" (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL "user1" "example.com")) (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL "user1" "example.com")) (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL "user1" "example.com")) (("user2 at hoge.example.com" NIL "user2" "example.com")) NIL NIL NIL "<WLXvFmpAZFNeQbPPITjRwimDyamnBm2 at test>"))This is a valid email address, and ENVELOPE reply is correct. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200901/44f4c915/attachment-0001.html>
On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 09:59, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote:> On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi <tachibana at qualitia.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is this expected or not? >> >> From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> >> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> >> ? >> a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) >> * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" >> "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" >> "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL >> NIL "user2" "hoge.example.com")) NIL NIL NIL >> "<WLXvFmpAZFNeQbPPITjRwimDyamnBm1 at test>")) > > This is an invalid email address, so it's neither correct nor > incorrect to have this output. But this reminded me that I was going > to discuss about this with other IETF people. Lets see what others > think: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/sqRTdsV_DGBhHu2ghdCDFo_pM8Q/While it is an invalid email address, in the exact same vein as <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2020-August/119658.html> Dovecot's approach is unhelpful here, and means MUAs must download complete headers rather than reply on envelope address structures. In fact, unlike in the linked case this example this is actually a security vulnerability: http://mailspolit.com/ As a MUA maintainer, I'd really like to see Dovecot take a more proactive approach to sending useful values in envelope address structure, so we don't have to download headers all the time.>> From: "user1 at fuga.example.com" <user1 at example.com> >> To: "user2 at hoge.example.com" <user2 at example.com> >> ? >> a uid fetch 43056 (envelope) >> * 1861 FETCH (UID 43056 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:53:59 +0900" >> "test1" (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL "user1" "example.com")) >> (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL "user1" "example.com")) >> (("user1 at fuga.example.com" NIL "user1" "example.com")) >> (("user2 at hoge.example.com" NIL "user2" "example.com")) NIL NIL NIL >> "<WLXvFmpAZFNeQbPPITjRwimDyamnBm2 at test>")) > > This is a valid email address, and ENVELOPE reply is correct.Agreed. //Mike -- Michael Gratton. <https://mjog.vee.net>