similar to: Samba Port Usage As ADDC via Wiki

The UDP binding logic will reuse local port numbers immediately. This causes problems for TFTP, which assumes a very low probability of a source port number being reused. The consequence is that lpxelinux.0 may end up downloading an incorrect file (e.g. attempting to download pxelinux.cfg/default but actually receiving a copy of ldlinux.c32, due to the port number having been reused). Fix by

I would like to suggest that if we modify the IANA registration of nut/3493, we do it formally using the official IANA form https://www.iana.org/form/ports-services , and that we agree on the form contents before submitting it. For example, who is the new assignee and who is the new contact? The last thing the IANA services manager needs is to talk to an unstructured crowd of us. Roger On

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:57:08 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai eveyone. > >   > > I know about the dns "things" in the past. DNS Islanding problems > etc. > > This one is a bit hijacking the subject : > > “Horrible BIND9_DLZ DNS breakage after DC replaced and samba-tool > domain demote

Reading the documentation there is conflicting information: According to https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/GlusterFSonCentOS we only need port TCP open between 2 GlusterFS servers: Ports TCP:24007-24008 are required for communication between GlusterFS nodes and each brick requires another TCP port starting at 24009. According to

Hi first project with samba, first post on this mailing list and, actually, first time using a mailing list ever ;-) In summary ========================================== I try to install samba in a test VMs, everything seems fine but when windows client joins the domain it doesn't register in samba's internal dns in detail ========================================== My objective -

Hi All, We've been thinking a lot about the 2 different ways dovecot implements shares; namespaces and symlinks. We currently use the symlink version for our clients and they use the create_dovecot_shares.pl tool we did at: http://dovecot.org/tools/ Our idea is either in the namespace declaration or if a folder has a dovecot-shared file/symlink, have a ldap lookup defined in say,

good lords of Kobol, that solved my problem ! thank you very much ! As we can consider this as an official workaround, should it be in the wiki ? (this is definitively in my docs now :) On 05/04/2016 07:55 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 5/4/2016 5:02 AM, David STIEVENARD wrote: >> Hi >> >> first project with samba, first post on this mailing list and, >>

Hai eveyone.   I know about the dns "things" in the past. DNS Islanding problems etc. This one is a bit hijacking the subject : “Horrible BIND9_DLZ DNS breakage after DC replaced and samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server”     I would like to suggest a smale change in how we suggest to setup samba ADDC dns things, and i do think this help in the setup of the AD

http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html "why is there such a delay in getting ipv6 rolled out when it solves all these problems ?" === There are many reasons... 1. Leasing Address Space from the I* society (small s...aka the Big Lie Society) is not desirable by all people... 2. The IPv6 Privacy Problem...that is especially important in the area of computer

I tried to close everything I had open and filter as best as I could.. but left random lines in just in case it helps. 172.16.5.230 is my local machine and *.33.235 is the server. This is a slow save.. 13:48:39.852340 (60) 001F5B35DB28 Broadcast UDP - Other Ports 172.16.5.93 172.16.5.255 00:04:53.922946 293.922946 13:48:39.852605 (60) 001F5B35DB28 USC-IANA

Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 08.26 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > > set 01 22:36:56 s-addc.studiomosca.net named[639]: samba_dlz: > > cancelling transaction on zone studiomosca.net > > That is showing that a client isn't being allowed to update a record. Is it possible to cure it in some way? > > [2] ----[smb.conf] > > > Please do not post

The transport type application/ogg may now be used in applications. The IANA has assigned it in their namespace, so start adding it at will. See mail below. Linus ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:23:47 -0800 From: IANA <iana@iana.org> To: triad@df.lth.se Cc: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu> Subject: RFC-to-be:

After reading this article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/31/blocking_chinese_ip_addresses/ I got to thinking that there is really no reason for *any* traffic to hit my servers that comes from anywhere outside North America. So I wrote the perl script at the end of this posting to extract selected IP ranges posted at iana.org and convert them into iptables rules blocking any traffic

Just idly watching * in console mode and saw that someone from 50.49.54.102 tried to register with my *. whois gives:- OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority OrgID: IANA Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 City: Marina del Rey StateProv: CA PostalCode: 90292-6695 Country: US NetRange: 50.0.0.0 - 50.255.255.255 CIDR: 50.0.0.0/8 NetName: RESERVED-50

Hai, If you use that or the AD, then its incomplete, imo. Your missing ldaps (636) and the GC (ssl) 3268/3269) ports and maybe NTP (123/tcp) if installed. Maybe you dont need them, just an observation. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jeff > Sadowski via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 13 februari 2018

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Ian Allison wrote: > I realize I could expand my LDAP but I'm wary of just importing some > random schema. Well, >>random<< schema ;-) you should know what you are doing. Check what is added to your LDAP and you'll be fine. > I've had mixed results doing that in the past (the qmail

Hi; I sucesyfully ran AD on samba4 software. All required by me functions works properly but when I turn on firewall my enviroment is getting very slow - logon process is 3 times longer then on system with disabled firewall service. Below I pasted my firewall configuration - I based on samba tutorial and aexples and official microsoft web page with needed ports: Have you similar problems after

Legalizer will expand arithmetics using addc and adde. Is it not working for you? It works fine on x86, you can take a look how it's done. Evan On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:03 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > My target doesn't support 64 bit arithmetic, so I'd like to supply > definitions for adde/addc. The problem is I can't seem to figure out > the > magic. Here's

On 01/25/2015 04:22 PM, Marko Cupa? wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:06:45 +0000 > "Thomas B. R?cker" <thomas at ruecker.fi> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2015 02:27 PM, Marko Cupa? wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am using icecast2-2.4.1,1 on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. In order to be able >>> to stream on port 80, I have redirected port 8080 to port 80

On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:31:10 +0000 "Thomas B. R?cker" <thomas at ruecker.fi> wrote: > On 01/25/2015 04:22 PM, Marko Cupa? wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:06:45 +0000 > > "Thomas B. R?cker" <thomas at ruecker.fi> wrote: > > > >> On 01/25/2015 02:27 PM, Marko Cupa? wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am