similar to: Sernet Packages - description

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Sernet Packages - description"

2015 Jan 28
2
Sernet Packages - description
Hi, Le 28/01/2015 10:28, Rowland Penny a ?crit : > On 28/01/15 02:37, Rich Webb wrote: > >> Also I'm hoping that the performance on this server will be faster >> than that of the domain controller. Currently this domain controller >> is serving files but I want to move that function to a dedicated box. > For months, there has been no explanation about the
2015 Jan 28
0
Sernet Packages - description
On 28/01/15 10:02, S?bastien Le Ray wrote: > Hi, > > > Le 28/01/2015 10:28, Rowland Penny a ?crit : >> On 28/01/15 02:37, Rich Webb wrote: >> >>> Also I'm hoping that the performance on this server will be faster >>> than that of the domain controller. Currently this domain >>> controller is serving files but I want to move that function
2014 Dec 19
3
setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 3
Im did not follow the complete thread, but you can check the following. smb.conf ## map id's outside to domain to tdb files. idmap config *:backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 50001-80000 ## map ids from the domain the range may not overlap ! idmap config DOMAIN:backend = ad idmap config DOMAIN:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config DOMAIN:range = 10000-40000 winbind
2014 Dec 19
2
setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 3
What's the content of your /etc/nsswitch.conf? Am 19. Dezember 2014 14:22:56 MEZ, schrieb Rich Webb <rwebb at zylatech.com>: >Matt, > >Thanks for the reply. I'm not trying to add the "users" group. I'm >trying to add the "Domain Users" group. That is the reason for the \ >in >front of the space. It's translated as a literal. I think
2015 Apr 02
7
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
On 02/04/15 13:38, buhorojo wrote: > On 02/04/15 14:09, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 02/04/15 12:41, buhorojo wrote: >>> On 02/04/15 12:48, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 02/04/15 11:37, buhorojo wrote: >>>>> On 02/04/15 12:19, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 02/04/15 11:05, buhorojo wrote: >>>>>>> On 02/04/15 11:27,
2014 Dec 18
6
setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 3
I just tried that and I got the same error. I think there is some extended acl support that I'm missing somewhere. It's like the setfacl command is not recognizing the AD groups as valid groups. I should also add the following information: This server is built up on CentOS 6.6 Minimal using the Sernet-Samba Enterprise packages. It looks like the binary that is running is
2014 Dec 19
3
setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 3
On 19/12/14 13:22, Rich Webb wrote: > Matt, > > Thanks for the reply. I'm not trying to add the "users" group. I'm > trying to add the "Domain Users" group. That is the reason for the \ in > front of the space. It's translated as a literal. I think I could also > put quotes around it and not have to use the \ and the space. > > The
2015 Apr 02
2
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
On 02/04/15 14:35, buhorojo wrote: > On 02/04/15 14:56, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 02/04/15 13:38, buhorojo wrote: >>> On 02/04/15 14:09, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 02/04/15 12:41, buhorojo wrote: >>>>> On 02/04/15 12:48, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 02/04/15 11:37, buhorojo wrote: >>>>>>> On 02/04/15 12:19,
2015 Apr 02
3
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
On 02/04/15 14:56, buhorojo wrote: > On 02/04/15 15:45, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 02/04/15 14:35, buhorojo wrote: >>> On 02/04/15 14:56, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 02/04/15 13:38, buhorojo wrote: >>>>> On 02/04/15 14:09, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 02/04/15 12:41, buhorojo wrote: >>>>>>> On 02/04/15 12:48,
2015 Apr 02
2
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
On 02/04/15 12:41, buhorojo wrote: > On 02/04/15 12:48, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 02/04/15 11:37, buhorojo wrote: >>> On 02/04/15 12:19, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 02/04/15 11:05, buhorojo wrote: >>>>> On 02/04/15 11:27, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 02/04/15 10:20, buhorojo wrote: >>>>>>> On 02/04/15 08:36,
2014 Dec 19
3
setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 3
On 19/12/14 13:40, Rich Webb wrote: > Running CentOS 6.6 > Using the Sernet Enterprise packages - sernet-samba-ad. > > Just tried: > > getent group "Domain Users" > getent group DOMAIN\\Domain\ Users > > and neither command returned any entries. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >
2015 Jan 28
1
Sernet Packages - description
Le 28/01/2015 11:12, Rowland Penny a ?crit : > On 28/01/15 10:02, S?bastien Le Ray wrote: > Probably not, but 4.2 hasn't been released yet (though it appears to > be imminent), so, until it is released, the recommendation stands. > >> >> In medium sized organizations with sparse small agencies around the >> country/world, having two boxes (either physical or
2015 Mar 14
1
New production system - a couple of issues hope you can help
Set up a samba 4 DC everything there seems fine. Set up a member server according to this article: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server The setup went fine - also set up a home share according to this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_home_share I'm using sernet-samba-ad for the domain controller and sernet-samba-winbind for the member server both
2019 Aug 13
2
Windows cannot access \\server check the spelling of the name 0x800704cf
Hai Rich, Your output of ipconfig /all Where are these? Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : This one is below in the output. Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Verify above again, if these 3 are all there and set to webb.local Then try this : in you network settings, disable ipv6 Beside ipv6 and the 2 missing outputs, i see the same here on my pc.
2015 Mar 23
2
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
On 23/03/15 12:51, Jhon P wrote: > One ADDC with linux Debian 7 and Samba4.1 working.} > Im test "NIS" and works fine after we expand the samba 4 schema. ;-) > > This is the DC with the problem of getent and can give domain users > infoonly "wbinfo -u". > > When list directories with "ls" also display UID instead Domain User > ID in the
2015 Mar 23
2
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
On 23/03/15 00:55, Jhon P wrote: > It will be necessary to join this PDC to the domain? Firstly, it is a 'DC' not a 'PDC', there really is no concept of a Primary Domain Controller in active directory, other than one of the FSMO roles. These FSMO roles are the only differences between DCs , other than this, all DCs are the same (or should) You do not join a DC to the domain
2005 Mar 05
1
IAX2 (Variables)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Webb [mailto:rwebb@ropeguru.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 5:24 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial > Discussion'; 'leandro_tenorio' > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 (Variables) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
2014 Dec 19
3
setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 3
Looks like that worked but the UIDs probably need to be mapped more appropriately - how do I take care of that? getent group "domain users" DOMAIN\Domain Users:*:100: Rich -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rich Webb Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 9:05 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re:
2015 Mar 23
2
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
On 23/03/15 13:15, Jhon P wrote: > Yes its correct. > > > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:09:26 +0000 > > From: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com > > To: samba at lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user > name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes > > > > On 23/03/15 12:51, Jhon P wrote: > > > One ADDC with
2015 Apr 02
0
sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
On 02/04/15 14:56, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 02/04/15 13:38, buhorojo wrote: >> On 02/04/15 14:09, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 02/04/15 12:41, buhorojo wrote: >>>> On 02/04/15 12:48, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 02/04/15 11:37, buhorojo wrote: >>>>>> On 02/04/15 12:19, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>>> On 02/04/15