similar to: question about installing samba and writing VFS module...

On 1/21/2015 10:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 21/01/15 15:05, Ed Sutter wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm new to Samba. My goal is to write a VFS module. >> I've been able to do this somewhat successfully; however there must be a better way... >> >> On my first attempt at this, I just installed samba using apt-get and configured >> the system to be a samba

On 1/21/2015 11:49 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 21/01/15 15:40, Ed Sutter wrote: >> On 1/21/2015 10:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 21/01/15 15:05, Ed Sutter wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> I'm new to Samba. My goal is to write a VFS module. >>>> I've been able to do this somewhat successfully; however there must be a better way...

On 21/01/15 15:40, Ed Sutter wrote: > On 1/21/2015 10:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 21/01/15 15:05, Ed Sutter wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I'm new to Samba. My goal is to write a VFS module. >>> I've been able to do this somewhat successfully; however there must >>> be a better way... >>> >>> On my first attempt at this, I just

On 21/01/15 15:05, Ed Sutter wrote: > Hi, > I'm new to Samba. My goal is to write a VFS module. > I've been able to do this somewhat successfully; however there must be > a better way... > > On my first attempt at this, I just installed samba using apt-get and > configured > the system to be a samba server (this worked just fine). > > Then, since I wanna

On 21/01/15 17:12, Ed Sutter wrote: > On 1/21/2015 11:49 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 21/01/15 15:40, Ed Sutter wrote: >>> On 1/21/2015 10:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 21/01/15 15:05, Ed Sutter wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I'm new to Samba. My goal is to write a VFS module. >>>>> I've been able to do this

Hi, I'm working with version 4.1.6 to create a new VFS module. I've been experimenting by just modifying one of the existing module source files (vfs_full_audit.c) and that rebuilds as expected. I want to step back now and create a unique module name, but I'm having trouble getting it to be included in the build. Using vfs_full_audit.c as my example, I've added entries into

On 1/24/2015 3:03 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:35:40PM -0500, Ed Sutter wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm working with version 4.1.6 to create a new VFS module. >> I've been experimenting by just modifying one of the existing >> module source files (vfs_full_audit.c) and that rebuilds as expected. >> >> I want to step back now and create

Any ideas why a vfs module loads successfully then can't be found? [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 5] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(309) se_access_check: access (2) granted. [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(203) Initialising default vfs hooks [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_custom(229) Initialising custom vfs hooks from [/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so]

We just noticed an interesting bug/misfeature on our Samba 4.9.4 servers (FreeBSD 11.2). The same effect is also visible on Samba 4.8.3 on CentOS 7. Start with a directory that looks like this: root at filur00:/tmp/test # ls -la total 50 drwxrwx--- 2 peter86 uf-iti-all 3 Feb 27 11:27 . drwxrwxrwt 10 root wheel 56 Feb 27 16:41 .. -rw-rw---- 1 mikha02 uf-iti-all 6 Feb 27 11:27

Well, Despite I've recently answered about vfs object recycle on this list, it seems that it isn't working as excepted. Using Samba 4.4.5, compiled from sources Here is the conf for a share: [musique] path = /media/data/musique read only = No vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle recycle:directory_mode = 0770 recycle:subdir_mode = 0700

Hallo, I?m using samba 4.11 from sernet and the vfs object full_audit. After update samba to 4.12 from sernet full_audit is broken and the shares with full_audit are not accessible. Can anyone tell me please how to install python 3 on centos7 while the Centos system needs python 2 but samba sould use python3? Thanks in advance, Peter

Hi all, I had implemented on one of my shares vfs full_audit module. It was working with Samba 3.0.x without any problems. After migration to Samba 3.4.3 this function doesn't work anymore - when it's enabled then share isn't accessible from users (it's visible but getting error when trying to connect to it). Audit and extd_audit vfs's are working fine, but they

> Is the 'vfs objects' line in the [global] section ? if so, try moving > it to the shares, there have been reports that adding 'vfs objects' to > [global] causes problems. > Rowland Dear Rowland This host is a Samba 4.6.2 domain member server. In the Global session of smb.conf, I have this line: Vfs objects = acl_xattr On Sharing: Vfs objects = recycle,

HI all, So I'd like to log the user's operations on some shares. As I need to know who made what when. I'd read a previous answer from Andrew about auditing, so I can see loggued operations. Modified smb.conf : > [global] > vfs objects = dfs_samba4, acl_xattr, full_audit > full_audit:success =none > full_audit:failure = none share is : > [journal] > path =

Folks, I tried using full_audit on Samba 3.0.28 by putting the following lines on smb.conf (global section): vfs objects = full_audit full_audit:facility = LOCAL2 full_audit:priority = WARN full_audit:prefix = %u|%m|%S full_audit:success = rename rmdir unlink write full_audit:failure = none My log says: Dec 29 13:57:07 lua smbd_audit: [2008/12/29 13:57:07, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(45) Dec

> Would this be on a DC ? > If so, you are removing the default vfs objects. and this is a known > ‘problem' Not on a DC - this is on AD member fileserver(s) It’s not a ‘problem’. It’s a _problem_. If you can’t add 'vfs objects’ without the default built-in module getting lost then how is that supposed to work at all? I’ve tried looking at the source code to see if there is

hello, everyone. I'm have a file server using samba 4.7.1 and it is a domain member. I'm using the vfs objects "recycle". everything works ok except that I have add the "profiles" directory as an exclude_dir in vfs recycle, but when I delete a file in \\profiles\myusername.V2\Desktop\filename.txt, the file goes to \\recycle. It seems that the exclue rule do not take

Good Day All I have a problem for our main fileserver base don samba 3.5.6 Let's give a bit of pregress first. We had a samba 3.5.6 installation which was acting as a PDC for our internal domian called CCDC. On a sapearate machine, we had another installation of samba 3.5.6 to act just as file share server. All was working ok, till I upgraded the PDC form samba 3.5.6 to samba 4.2.2 , using

Folks, Given recent discussion on this list I have just updated the master Samba-Docs information regarding the Debug Class (Log Level) settings and the audit information each causes to be logged. This will appear in on-line versions of the Samba-HOWTO-Collection within 24 hours. To obtain an updated version point your browser at: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf

Hi all, I'm running debian 6, x64, stock samba 3.5.6, various clients. As soon as I enable the full_audit vfs object in smb.conf, my msdfs links stop working with: - INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 and - failed to get vfs_handle->data! in the samba logfiles. Is there a known problem with this combination? I'm guessing that this combination is supposed to work..? I have a level 10 log