Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Sysvol not accessible?"
2015 Jan 15
0
Sysvol not accessible?
I may have just solved this. I realized I could access \\dc01\sysvol and
\\dc02\sysvol but I randomly could not access \\domain\sysvol for some
unknown reason. I did "host -t A domain" and got THREE addresses back,
but I only have TWO DCs. With that said, I imagine the systems are
randomly being referred to the third, non-existent DC and failing. I
will be researching this shortly and if
2015 Jun 04
4
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 6/3/2015 11:43 AM, Ryan Ashley wrote:
> James, I cloned it using git. I installed it to a private partition
> (/samba) back when I was first testing Samba4. It is in the path and
> this worked for ages, but recently just stopped. No errors, no warnings,
> nothing. Just dead.
>
> The GP in question is the default domain policy. I already tried
> unlinking it and it fails on
2016 Apr 14
4
Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058)
I hate 'me too' replies - but I have also been struggling with this for
some years in my multi-DC environment. (yes, replicated sysvol via lsyncd +
rsync; permissions looked identical via getfacl last time I checked).
Sometimes a client machine will run gpupdate just fine; other times it will
fail, seemingly randomly.
My next step was going to be to run wireshark on a client machine to
2016 Mar 30
2
Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058)
I found this one.
Check which one works for you.
http://www.eventid.net/display-eventid-40960-source-LSASRV-eventno-8508-phase-1.htm
Im sure this is not a samba configuration problem.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens L.P.H. van Belle
> Verzonden: dinsdag 29 maart 2016 16:18
> Aan: samba at
2014 Sep 12
1
Group Policy failures related to machine password replication
We are using Samba-4.1.11.
I can run gpupdate /force without error on my machine.
H:\>type \\dc01.mediture.dom\SysVol\mediture.dom\Policies\{77F82F0F-AE2B-42F3-B173-D42F4BEEC0BA}\gpt.ini
[General]
Version=65551
displayName=New Group Policy Object
H:\>type \\dc02.mediture.dom\SysVol\mediture.dom\Policies\{77F82F0F-AE2B-42F3-B173-D42F4BEEC0BA}\gpt.ini
[General]
Version=65551
displayName=New
2015 Jul 03
3
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 03/07/15 15:18, Ryan Ashley wrote:
> The only Unix client I can think of would be the Buffalo NAS. It runs
> Samba3 and hosts various shares via SMB. DNS is handled by BIND9 on the
> Samba4 DC. DNS does work and the domain name resolves to the IP address
> of the server. DHCP is also handled on the DC. As for the GPO's, they're
> in the correct place as far as I can tell.
2015 Jul 03
2
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 03/07/15 15:58, Ryan Ashley wrote:
> They left a PC on, so I got the info. The info pissed me off, but not
> because of the issue. This time it worked flawlessly, but I got the
> error from the event log from prior attempts. First, today's results.
>
> C:\Users\reachfp.KIGM>gpupdate
> Updating Policy...
>
> User Policy update has completed successfully.
>
2018 Jan 11
2
Sysvolreset
On 1/11/2018 10:45 AM, Carlos via samba wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any ?
>
> Regards;
>
>
> On 10-01-2018 15:11, Carlos wrote:
>>
>> Every 5 minutes.
>>
>> This moment(before sysvolreset,) machine is ok . This comend is valid
>> now ?
>>
>> *In DC01 Problem does not exist with sysvol.
>>
>> Regards;
>>
>>
>>
2018 Jan 10
2
Sysvolreset
Every 5 minutes.
This moment(before sysvolreset,) machine is ok . This comend is valid now ?
*In DC01 Problem does not exist with sysvol.
Regards;
On 10-01-2018 14:51, lingpanda101 via samba wrote:
> On 1/10/2018 11:42 AM, Carlos via samba wrote:
>> HI
>>
>> Rsync
>>
>> DC1 to DC2 / DC3
>>
>> root / usr / bin / rsync -XAaz --delete-after / opt /
2014 Aug 21
1
Proper sysvol replication solution...
I see the Samba guide suggests using rsync to keep sysvols in sync, but
this poses a problem with ID's and it is only one-way. I have been
hesitant to suggest anything because of the flak I have been getting,
but I do believe I have a much better solution that transfers files via
SSH, is bi-directional (no more only editing group policy on one
server), and does NOT set UID/GID
2015 May 26
5
Clients unable to get group policy...
Sorry for the delay, I have been out of town. Your hunch was correct,
Rowland. Both getent and id only return local machine accounts, not
domain accounts. What have I overlooked which would cause this? I do
have winbind in my PAM configuration.
James, it has worked for a few years. It recently (in the last year)
started having workstations report being unable to access the gpt.ini
files. The
2015 Jun 05
2
Clients unable to get group policy...
I noticed something different on the page you linked. It must be
outdated or maybe it is setup for a different version of Debian. The
system runs Debian Wheezy AMD64. The paths referenced do not exist. I
also checked several other Debian systems and NONE have the
"x86_64-linux-gnu" directories.
root at dc01:~# uname -r
2.6.32-5-amd64
root at dc01:~# l /lib | grep x86
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
2018 Jan 10
2
Sysvolreset
HI
Rsync
DC1 to DC2 / DC3
root / usr / bin / rsync -XAaz --delete-after / opt / samba / var /
locks / sysvol root @ DCXX: / opt / samba / var /
Run Windows "gpupdate / force", information error permission (show ID
GPO, any gpos ...).
Yes, the only gpo, with errors.
Regards;
On 10-01-2018 14:29, lingpanda101 via samba wrote:
> On 1/10/2018 8:59 AM, Carlos via samba wrote:
2020 May 04
2
Access Denied to Netlogon Share on secondary DC
Hello Andrew,
i use the rsync script from the wiki....
crontabl -l
*/5 * * * * rsync -XAavz --delete-after
--password-file=/etc/samba/rsync-sysvol.secret
rsync://sysvol-replication at dc01.samba.laurenz.ws/SysVol
/var/lib/samba/sysvol/
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Andrew Bartlett
via samba
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Mai 2020
2020 Oct 26
7
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
> It's needed after every GPO addition and edit. There must be a root
> cause to hunt down somewhere. Or is it a bug in 4.13.0 ?
Yes, and no.
Yes, its a bug.
No, in my opionion its an old setting thats just needs some updating.
Try this.
samba-tool ntacl set
"O:LAG:BAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;BA)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;SO)(A;OICI;0x001f01
2016 Apr 18
5
Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058)
Ok based on the MS link.
Have you enabled under Computer Configuration in the navigation tree on the left side, navigate to Administrative Templates\System\Logon
Enable "Always wait for the network at computer startup and logon"
If not done yet.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sébastien Le Ray
2015 Jul 02
5
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 02/07/15 16:55, Ryan Ashley wrote:
> Rowland, here is what I found in the ldb.
>
> # record 68
> dn: CN=S-1-5-32-544
> cn: S-1-5-32-544
> objectClass: sidMap
> objectSid: S-1-5-32-544
> type: ID_TYPE_BOTH
> xidNumber: 3000000
> distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-32-544
>
> # record 70
> dn: CN=S-1-5-32-549
> cn: S-1-5-32-549
> objectClass: sidMap
>
2014 Apr 08
1
Samba4 policies acl corruption
Hi everybody.
One month ago me migrated from samba 3.6 classic domain to samba4.
After solving some minor problems, we have found ourselves with a ACL
corruption and we don't know how to deal with this.
When accesing to our sysvol shared (for example, \\domain.local\sysvol)
from both Samba or Windows clients, we are refused to connect.
Domain=[VECTORSF] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.4]
2015 May 20
3
Clients unable to get group policy...
I have been fighting a strange issue with Samba for over a year now, and
I am at my wits end. For some reason, clients are unable to get group
policy settings from the servers. It honestly appears to be the Windows
7 systems just deciding they don't want to, but they're not terminators.
The systems can ping both Samba servers and can even map the sysvol
shares to a drive and navigate them.
2020 May 04
3
Access Denied to Netlogon Share on secondary DC
Hello $list,
i can't access the netlogon share on the second dc. I got this error:
Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: [2020/05/04 22:13:53.035964, 0]
../../source3/smbd/uid.c:448(change_to_user_internal)
Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: change_to_user_internal:
chdir_current_service() failed!
Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: [2020/05/04 22:13:53.037230, 0]